Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of an Employment Standards Act claim.

The Tribunal later requested an update on the status of the other proceedings and warned that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond within the required timeframe.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Currie v. Charm Diamond Centers, 2015 HRTO 642

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 14, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the resolution of a WSIAT appeal.

The Tribunal subsequently requested an update on the status of the other proceedings, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond within the specified timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Russell Douglas v. Trench Ltd., 2015 HRTO 631

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to request to dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents filed a response requesting that the application be dismissed because another proceeding had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a reply responding to the request to dismiss.

The applicant failed to respond to the initial notice and a follow-up letter.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Moncton v. Steam Plus Carpet & Janitorial Cleaning Inc., 2015 HRTO 627

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2015

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicants failed to respond to notices.

The applicants filed applications under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued Notices of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the applications appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicants failed to respond to the notices and a subsequent follow-up email.

The Tribunal deemed the applications abandoned and dismissed them.

I.B. v. Pickering (City), 2015 HRTO 626

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Mario Jastak v. Lennox and Addington Addictions and Community Mental Health, 2015 HRTO 628

Robert Choi

2 cases2014–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 7, 2015

Tribunal awards $24,857 in damages for pregnancy-related termination after dismissing respondent's bias objection regarding further evidence.

Following a finding that the applicant's employment was terminated due to her pregnancy, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario held a further hearing to determine the appropriate remedy.

The respondent objected to the Tribunal hearing further evidence, arguing it created a reasonable apprehension of bias.

The Tribunal dismissed the objection, noting its broad fact-finding powers under the Human Rights Code to ensure a fair and just process.

The Tribunal awarded the applicant $9,857.34 for lost wages and $15,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, plus prejudgment interest.

Marne v. Aptco Capital Corporation, 2015 HRTO 588

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of ongoing grievance proceedings.

After the applicant failed to respond to multiple written requests from the Tribunal for an update on the status of the grievance proceedings, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Shagufta Tahir v. City of Toronto, 2015 HRTO 494

Tribunal dismisses applicant's requests for publication ban and hearing deferral in human rights applications.

The applicant filed three human rights applications alleging discrimination by the Toronto Police Services Board and individual officers.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several procedural requests from the applicant.

The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's requests for a publication ban, anonymization, and deferral of the hearing.

On consent, one individual respondent was removed.

The Tribunal deferred the request to add another respondent pending proper service, and directed the applicant to confirm his attendance at an in-person hearing.

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 493

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing grievance proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently sent multiple letters requesting an update on the status of the grievance proceedings, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond to the correspondence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Peterson v. Toker, 2015 HRTO 486

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 14, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Janette Santos v. Victor Butaw, 2015 HRTO 472

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 7, 2015

Applicant permitted to call medical witnesses by teleconference to avoid needless inconvenience and cost.

The applicant requested an order permitting her to call her two physicians as witnesses by teleconference, citing the cost of having them attend in person in London from Burlington.

The respondents objected, arguing they needed the doctors to attend in person to fully respond and question them, and raised doubts about the family doctor's credentials.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that requiring in-person attendance would needlessly inconvenience the witnesses and that cross-examination could be effectively conducted over the phone.

Karen Creary v. Melissa Bajaj and Sundip Bajaj, 2015 HRTO 452

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 2, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

She failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not respond to subsequent Tribunal correspondence inquiring about her intentions.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Maitland v. Art Press Ltd., 2015 HRTO 444

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2015

Human rights application deferred due to CCAA stay of proceedings against Target Canada.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The organizational respondent, Target Canada, was granted protection from its creditors under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, which included a stay of proceedings.

The applicant indicated she wished to proceed with her application but did not intend to take steps to lift the court-ordered stay.

The Tribunal held that it was bound by the Superior Court order and deferred the application until the stay period ended or was lifted.

Cherese James v. Target Canada and Susan McGann, 2015 HRTO 429

David Gourlay

34 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2015

Tribunal denies police board's request to defer human rights application pending judicial review in separate case.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discriminatory detention and vehicle search by police.

The respondent requested deferral of the application pending a judicial review in a separate case regarding the Tribunal's power to dismiss applications under s. 45.1 of the Code when a Police Services Act complaint has been filed.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, consistent with its previous decisions.

The Tribunal also denied the applicant's request for a publication ban, finding no basis for such an extraordinary order.

Doug Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 430

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 30, 2015

Respondents ordered to immediately deliver all arguably relevant documents after failing to comply with Tribunal Rules.

The applicants filed a Request for Order During Proceeding seeking an order requiring the respondents to deliver all arguably relevant documents in their possession as required by Rule 16.1 of the Tribunal's Rules.

The respondents failed to respond to the Request.

The Tribunal ordered the respondents to immediately deliver the documents, noting that the consequences of their failure to comply with the Rules may be addressed at the hearing.

Ducharme v. Essex Condominium Corporation No. 39, 2015 HRTO 408

Thomas A. Stefanik

34 cases1981–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2015

Third-party employment agency ordered to produce portion of applicant's employment file relating to respondent.

The respondent in a human rights application requested an order for the production of the applicant's employment file from a third-party employment agency.

The third party and the applicant did not oppose the request.

The Tribunal ordered the third party to produce the portion of the file relating to the applicant's assignment with the respondent, finding a request for the entire file overly broad at this stage.

The Tribunal also extended the deadlines for the parties to exchange documents and witness lists.

Shirley v. Can-Am Logistics Inc., 2015 HRTO 402

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2015

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as respondent is a federally regulated inter-provincial trucking company.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed on the basis that it is an inter-provincial transportation company and therefore federally regulated.

The Tribunal found that the respondent is engaged in inter-provincial trucking, which falls under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Carlton Smith v. Canpar Transport L.P., 2015 HRTO 404

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and a subsequent follow-up email.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Lori Anne Phillpotts-de Lisser v. International Automotive Group – Mid-Toronto Mitsubishi, 2015 HRTO 388

Daryn M. Jeffries

In Private Practice10 cases1996–2021

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2015

Summary hearing request to dismiss human rights application denied; full hearing required to assess evidence.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the applicant's human rights application alleging discrimination in employment and accommodation based on disability.

The respondent argued the application had no reasonable prospect of success, was delayed, and dealt with matters already settled before the Landlord and Tenant Board.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations regarding increased scrutiny and termination following the disclosure of a disability required a full hearing to assess the evidence.

The respondent's request to dismiss the application was denied, and the applicant was granted leave to amend the application.

Campbell v. 145 Liberty Properties Inc., 2015 HRTO 358

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 19, 2015

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to establish criteria under Rule 26.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged age discrimination and reprisal but did not present any new facts or evidence in her request.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish any of the criteria under Rule 26 for reconsideration and denied the request.

Wilk v. St. Stanislaus – St. Casimir’s Polish Credit Union, 2015 HRTO 351

Page 10 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 10 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Currie v. Charm Diamond Centers, 2015 HRTO 642

Naomi Overend

Russell Douglas v. Trench Ltd., 2015 HRTO 631

Naomi Overend

Moncton v. Steam Plus Carpet & Janitorial Cleaning Inc., 2015 HRTO 627

Naomi Overend

I.B. v. Pickering (City), 2015 HRTO 626

Naomi Overend

Mario Jastak v. Lennox and Addington Addictions and Community Mental Health, 2015 HRTO 628

Robert Choi

Naomi Overend

Marne v. Aptco Capital Corporation, 2015 HRTO 588

Naomi Overend

Shagufta Tahir v. City of Toronto, 2015 HRTO 494

Naomi Calla

Lisa C. Cabel

David A. Gourlay

Antonella Ceddia

Naomi Overend

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 493

Naomi Overend

Peterson v. Toker, 2015 HRTO 486

Naomi Overend

Janette Santos v. Victor Butaw, 2015 HRTO 472

Naomi Overend

Karen Creary v. Melissa Bajaj and Sundip Bajaj, 2015 HRTO 452

Naomi Overend

Maitland v. Art Press Ltd., 2015 HRTO 444

Naomi Overend

Cherese James v. Target Canada and Susan McGann, 2015 HRTO 429

David Gourlay

Naomi Overend

Doug Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 430

Naomi Overend

Ducharme v. Essex Condominium Corporation No. 39, 2015 HRTO 408

Thomas A. Stefanik

Naomi Overend

Shirley v. Can-Am Logistics Inc., 2015 HRTO 402

Naomi Overend

Carlton Smith v. Canpar Transport L.P., 2015 HRTO 404

Naomi Overend

Lori Anne Phillpotts-de Lisser v. International Automotive Group – Mid-Toronto Mitsubishi, 2015 HRTO 388

Daryn M. Jeffries

Naomi Overend

Campbell v. 145 Liberty Properties Inc., 2015 HRTO 358

Naomi Overend

Wilk v. St. Stanislaus – St. Casimir’s Polish Credit Union, 2015 HRTO 351

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent

for Pizza Nova

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale