Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 7, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal notices.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss Application and directed the applicant to file written submissions.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and a subsequent warning letter.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Crystal Martin v. Fallsview Casino Resort, 2016 HRTO 431

Joint requests to amend pleadings and adjourn hearing granted; applicant's request for costs denied.

The parties made joint requests to file amended pleadings and to adjourn the scheduled hearing.

The Tribunal granted both requests.

The applicant also requested costs, which the Tribunal denied on the basis that it lacks the statutory authority to award costs.

Betrework Wondmeneh v. The Ethiopian Emergency Mutual Relief (IDER) Association in Toronto, 2016 HRTO 440

Sarah Eves

7 cases2009–2016

Helen Nowak

8 cases2012–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 5, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance dealing with same subject matter.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment by her employer and union.

Prior to the application, the union had filed a grievance on her behalf raising the same human rights issues.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the resolution of the grievance proceeding.

Finding that the grievance was filed first, dealt with the same subject matter, and that the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Human Rights Code, the Tribunal concluded that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance.

Maria Maio v. West Park Healthcare Centre, 2016 HRTO 426

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 5, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to review WSIB benefit decisions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board discriminated against him on the basis of disability when it denied him full benefits for a workplace injury.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction questioning its jurisdiction to hear the matter.

After receiving written submissions from the applicant, the Tribunal dismissed the application on a preliminary basis, finding that it does not have the jurisdiction to review decisions made under statutory benefit programs to determine if they are correct.

Gillespie v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2016 HRTO 421

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2016

Human rights application alleging pregnancy discrimination and sexual harassment dismissed for lack of credible evidence.

The applicant alleged that her former employer discriminated against her on the basis of sex (pregnancy) by terminating her employment after she returned from maternity leave, and that she was subjected to sexual harassment and unwanted sexual advances.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's employment was terminated due to insubordination and poor performance, not because of her maternity leave.

The Tribunal also dismissed the allegations of sexual harassment and advances, finding the applicant's evidence to be vague and lacking credibility.

The application was dismissed in its entirety.

Takhar v. CSM Driver Services Inc., 2016 HRTO 407

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal direction.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal sent an Advise Intent letter requiring the applicant to indicate whether he wished to proceed with or withdraw the application following the withdrawal of a related grievance.

The applicant failed to respond within the required timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Ian Holness v. City of Toronto and Frank Sguigna, 2016 HRTO 409

Orie Niedzviecki

1 case2016–2016

David Ross

7 cases2003–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 18, 2016

Hearing adjourned as respondent's temporary layoff of entire workforce left counsel without an instructing client.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing because it had temporarily laid off its entire workforce due to financing issues, leaving its counsel without an instructing client.

The applicant opposed the request, arguing the respondent's owner could instruct counsel and witnesses could be summoned.

The Tribunal found that the lack of an instructing client constituted extraordinary circumstances justifying an adjournment to ensure natural justice and procedural fairness.

The adjournment was granted, with directions for rescheduling.

Lina Misotchnick v. Moloney Electric Inc., 2016 HRTO 354

Anne Gallop

7 cases2000–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2016

Reprisal application dismissed; termination was due to unmanageable behaviour, not human rights complaints.

The applicant alleged that her employment was terminated as a reprisal for filing an internal sexual harassment complaint against a co-worker, requesting security measures, and filing a human rights application against a previous employer.

The Tribunal found that the respondent had investigated and upheld the sexual harassment complaint, disciplined the co-worker, and accommodated the applicant's security requests.

The Tribunal concluded that the termination, which occurred 10.5 months later, was not a reprisal but was due to the applicant's unmanageable, insubordinate, and unprofessional behaviour in the workplace.

The application was dismissed.

Bhomisha v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty Canada Inc., 2016 HRTO 331

David Law

Suspended Administratively11 cases2000–2019

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as untimely because pursuing a Ministry of Labour claim does not excuse delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging racial discrimination by his former employer approximately four months after the one-year limitation period expired.

The applicant argued the delay was in good faith because he was pursuing an Employment Standards claim with the Ministry of Labour.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding the delay was not incurred in good faith as the applicant had been repeatedly advised by the Ministry of Labour well within the limitation period that discrimination claims must be filed with the Tribunal.

Mahdee Jodayree Akbarfam v. Canadian Corps of Commissionaires, Ottawa Division, 2016 HRTO 252

Nicole Godfrey

11 cases2012–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2016

Consent request for late adjournment denied as no extraordinary circumstances were established.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing on the basis that the applicant intended to file a request to amend his Application, and both parties consented to the adjournment.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting it was made more than 14 days after the Notice of Hearing was issued.

The Tribunal held that the applicant had not actually filed a request to amend, and even if he had, it would not constitute an extraordinary circumstance warranting an adjournment.

Mohammed Azizullah v. Firearms Safety Education Service of Ontario, 2016 HRTO 205

Heather McIvor

Practising Law - Employed19 cases2012–2023

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as untimely; delay of over three years not incurred in good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on disability, claiming his manager gave him a negative performance appraisal in 2011 after he returned from medical leaves.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed as untimely.

The Tribunal found the last alleged incident occurred in 2011, making the 2015 application well outside the one-year limitation period under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's arguments that the delay was incurred in good faith due to internal complaints, health issues, lack of legal knowledge, or fear of reprisal.

The application was dismissed.

Bruno v. Ontario (Treasury Board Secretariat), 2016 HRTO 229

Harjaap Mann

8 cases2012–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 14, 2016

Respondent's unopposed request to amend its Response granted.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend its Response.

The applicant consented to the request and did not file a response.

The Tribunal granted the request and permitted the applicant to file a Reply to the amended Response within 14 days.

Khalida Kesury v. 6297030 Canada Limited o/a New Age Technology and Perry Messervey, 2016 HRTO 60

Maureen A. Houston

3 cases2016–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2016

Applicant ordered to release occupational health records to allow employer to respond to discrimination application.

The respondent employer requested an order requiring the applicant to consent to the release of her occupational health file held by a third-party provider.

The applicant had alleged failure to accommodate her disability but refused to release the records.

The Tribunal found that the respondent needed the records to meaningfully respond to the application and ordered the applicant to sign a consent form waiving confidentiality.

Dickson v. Quinte Healthcare Corporation, 2016 HRTO 52

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal notices.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Incomplete Application and Notice of Intent to Dismiss, directing the applicant to file a complete application and written submissions.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

B.J. v. Long Tall Sally, 2016 HRTO 27

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal sent a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) requiring written submissions by a specified date, warning that failure to respond could result in abandonment.

The applicant failed to file submissions.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Ksiazkiewicz v. St. Davids Ratepayers Association, 2016 HRTO 26

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2016

Reconsideration and anonymization requests dismissed; applicant failed to meet criteria and open justice prevailed.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed outside the one-year time limit.

He also requested that his name be anonymized in the decisions to protect his future employment prospects.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant merely reargued his case and did not meet the criteria under Rule 26.5.

The Tribunal also denied the request for anonymization, holding that the principle of open justice outweighed the applicant's concerns, as the decisions contained no personal or sensitive information.

Shaw v. Bombardier Transportation, 2016 HRTO 18

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2016

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant merely repeated previous arguments without meeting procedural criteria.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application against the Family Responsibility Office as an abuse of process.

The applicant argued that the decision should be reconsidered under Rule 26.5(c) and (d) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant failed to explain how his request met the criteria and merely repeated the same arguments made at the summary hearing.

The Tribunal noted that reconsideration is not an appeal or an opportunity to reargue a case.

Goetze v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 16

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2016

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing disability discrimination application dismissed as an attempt to reargue.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the termination of his employment.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to demonstrate how his request met the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, as he merely repeated previous arguments and attempted to reargue the case.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Abbasi v. Sygenics Inc., 2016 HRTO 10

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2016

Request for reconsideration of untimely human rights application dismissal denied.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application on a preliminary basis for being untimely.

The applicant argued that declining jurisdiction for technical reasons was contrary to the public interest and that the last incident of discrimination occurred later than the Tribunal found.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that it cannot consider the merits of an application outside its jurisdiction and that reconsideration is not an opportunity to reargue the case.

Icallo v. Oak Leaf Confections, 2016 HRTO 6

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2016

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant merely attempted to reargue the case.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant argued the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence but failed to explain how, instead repeating previous arguments and raising new ones that could have been made earlier.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that reconsideration is not an appeal or an opportunity to reargue a case.

Adegorite v. York Region District School Board, 2016 HRTO 5

Page 5 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 5 of 29 (567 cases)

Ken Bhattacharjee

Crystal Martin v. Fallsview Casino Resort, 2016 HRTO 431

H. Keith Juriansz

Daniel Kebede

Ken Bhattacharjee

Betrework Wondmeneh v. The Ethiopian Emergency Mutual Relief (IDER) Association in Toronto, 2016 HRTO 440

Sarah Eves

Helen Nowak

Ken Bhattacharjee

Maria Maio v. West Park Healthcare Centre, 2016 HRTO 426

Ken Bhattacharjee

Gillespie v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2016 HRTO 421

Ken Bhattacharjee

Takhar v. CSM Driver Services Inc., 2016 HRTO 407

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ian Holness v. City of Toronto and Frank Sguigna, 2016 HRTO 409

Orie Niedzviecki

David Ross

Ken Bhattacharjee

Lina Misotchnick v. Moloney Electric Inc., 2016 HRTO 354

Anne Gallop

Ken Bhattacharjee

Bhomisha v. Aimia Proprietary Loyalty Canada Inc., 2016 HRTO 331

David Law

Ken Bhattacharjee

Mahdee Jodayree Akbarfam v. Canadian Corps of Commissionaires, Ottawa Division, 2016 HRTO 252

Nicole Godfrey

Ken Bhattacharjee

Mohammed Azizullah v. Firearms Safety Education Service of Ontario, 2016 HRTO 205

Heather McIvor

Ken Bhattacharjee

Bruno v. Ontario (Treasury Board Secretariat), 2016 HRTO 229

Harjaap Mann

Ken Bhattacharjee

Khalida Kesury v. 6297030 Canada Limited o/a New Age Technology and Perry Messervey, 2016 HRTO 60

Maureen A. Houston

Ken Bhattacharjee

Dickson v. Quinte Healthcare Corporation, 2016 HRTO 52

Ken Bhattacharjee

B.J. v. Long Tall Sally, 2016 HRTO 27

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ksiazkiewicz v. St. Davids Ratepayers Association, 2016 HRTO 26

Ken Bhattacharjee

Shaw v. Bombardier Transportation, 2016 HRTO 18

Ken Bhattacharjee

Goetze v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 16

Ken Bhattacharjee

Abbasi v. Sygenics Inc., 2016 HRTO 10

Ken Bhattacharjee

Icallo v. Oak Leaf Confections, 2016 HRTO 6

Ken Bhattacharjee

Adegorite v. York Region District School Board, 2016 HRTO 5

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party