The applicant, a former municipal employee, sought judicial review of a Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal decision that upheld the respondent municipality's pay equity plan.
The applicant challenged various factual findings, including the exclusion of certain male comparators, the treatment of non-monetary benefits, and the tribunal's refusal to order production of allegedly privileged legal advice.
Applying the Vavilov framework, the Divisional Court found the tribunal's decision to be reasonable, transparent, and intelligible, noting that the court's role is not to reweigh evidence.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
