Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal sent a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, directing the applicant to file written submissions and warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to file written submissions.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Osmer v. Katzman Enterprises (Leopard Lounge), 2016 HRTO 759

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 1, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was previously deferred pending the completion of a Claims Adjudication Officer's proceeding.

The Tribunal subsequently directed the applicant to provide a status update on the other proceeding, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

After the applicant failed to respond to multiple communications, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Oram v. Abitibi-Consolidated Company of Canada, 2016 HRTO 751

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 1, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After requesting to reschedule a mediation, the applicant failed to respond to multiple communications from the Tribunal directing him to provide available dates.

The Tribunal warned the applicant that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond, and the Tribunal dismissed the application for abandonment pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the HRTO Rules of Procedure.

Pressello v. Fred Victor Centre, 2016 HRTO 749

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisals by her employer.

The union had previously filed grievances on her behalf regarding her termination, which were before an arbitrator.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding.

The Tribunal found that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed, as the grievances dealt with similar subject matter and the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Human Rights Code.

The application was deferred.

Michail v. London District Catholic School Board, 2016 HRTO 745

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2016

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed three human rights applications but failed to file replies, respond to requests for summary hearing, or provide a written update of her mailing address.

After failing to respond to a Case Assessment Direction requiring her to confirm she was still pursuing her applications, the Tribunal deemed the applications abandoned and dismissed them.

Lewis v. Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2016 HRTO 730

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 19, 2016

Application reactivated; preliminary hearing ordered to determine if Employment Standards decision dealt with substance.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending an Employment Standards proceeding.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was resolved in the applicant's favour by the Employment Standards Officer.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application and directed a preliminary hearing to determine whether the Employment Standards process constituted a 'proceeding' that appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

Hughes v. 1378768 Ontario Inc. o/a City Centre Collision, 2016 HRTO 681

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2016

Human rights application stayed due to respondent's bankruptcy; applicant directed to advise on next steps.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision noting that proceedings against the respondent are stayed pursuant to s. 69 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The applicant was directed to advise the Tribunal whether she intends to bring a motion in court to lift the stay, failing which the application would likely be deemed abandoned.

Sofia Kitsis v. Di-Cut Industries Ltd., 2016 HRTO 680

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as out of time; computer issues and unsupported illness did not constitute good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application 10 days after the expiry of the one-year limitation period under the Human Rights Code.

The applicant claimed the delay was due to illness and technical issues with his personal computer.

The Tribunal found that the delay was not incurred in good faith, noting a lack of medical evidence to support the illness claim and the availability of alternative filing methods.

The application was dismissed on a preliminary basis for being outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

Makhlouf Chabane v. Toronto Police Services – Police Officers Division 51, 2016 HRTO 651

Andrew Porter

7 cases2015–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2016

Request to defer human rights hearing pending judicial review of interim decision denied.

The respondent requested to defer the hearing of the merits of a human rights application pending the conclusion of its application for judicial review of a previous interim decision.

The Tribunal denied the request, applying the principle that administrative proceedings should not be fragmented or delayed by judicial review applications absent exceptional circumstances.

The hearing was ordered to proceed as scheduled.

Dolny v. College of Massage Therapists of Ontario, 2016 HRTO 655

Osborne G. Barnwell

10 cases2009–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2016

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant failed to file a compliant psychiatric report regarding hearing capacity.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision dismissing his human rights application for abandonment and delay.

The application had been dismissed after the applicant failed to file a psychiatrist's report regarding his behaviour at the hearing, despite multiple extensions.

The Tribunal found that the psychiatrist's report eventually filed by the applicant did not comply with the Tribunal's directions, as it failed to address his capacity to participate in the hearing.

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's arguments regarding procedural fairness and delay, and dismissed the request for reconsideration.

Rose v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 647

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2016

Reconsideration of decision dismissing late human rights application denied due to lack of credible evidence.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed outside the one-year statutory time limit.

The applicant argued he had faxed the application within the time limit and had not received notice that it was filed late.

The Tribunal found the applicant had received multiple notices regarding the late filing and provided no credible evidence of the alleged fax.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

James v. Toronto District School Board, 2016 HRTO 617

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2016

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant merely reargued her case without presenting new evidence.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application as untimely.

The applicant argued that her application was timely and referred to previous court decisions.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was merely rearguing her case and did not present new facts or evidence, nor did she show that the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Zhang v. The Guarantee Company of North America, 2016 HRTO 623

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2016

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant failed to establish grounds under Rule 26.5.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application.

He argued that the decision was delayed, raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, ignored evidence, and that he had submitted video evidence that the Tribunal claimed was not filed.

The Tribunal found no grounds for reconsideration, noting that the delay did not render the hearing unfair, the bias allegations were merely disagreements with the findings, and the video evidence was neither newly obtained nor determinative of the case.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Perumal v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 561

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2016

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant had received notice of the hearing he failed to attend.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a decision dismissing his human rights application after he failed to appear at the scheduled hearing.

The applicant claimed he did not receive notice of the hearing, his lawyer dropped his case, and a friend helping him had a family emergency.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had received notice via a Case Assessment Direction, to which he had responded by filing documents.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant failed to establish grounds for reconsideration and dismissed the request.

Cabral v. TJX Canada (Winners Merchants Inc.), 2016 HRTO 565

Civita Gauley

4 cases2014–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2016

Reconsideration of decision dismissing human rights application due to prior labour arbitration denied.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application against his employer and union.

The original decision found that a labour arbitration had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the decision conflicted with established jurisprudence regarding the application of s. 45.1.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the original decision correctly applied the Supreme Court of Canada's reasoning in Figliola and subsequent Tribunal jurisprudence.

Federow v. Niagara Falls (City), 2016 HRTO 562

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2016

Requests to intervene by hockey organizations and the Commission granted; individual's request denied.

In a human rights application regarding the use of Indigenous names and images by sports organizations, several organizations and one individual filed requests to intervene.

The Tribunal granted the requests of the Ontario Human Rights Commission and three local hockey organizations, finding they had a significant interest and would not unduly delay the proceeding.

The request of an individual was denied for failing to explain his significant interest or special contribution.

The Tribunal also directed that notice be given to specific First Nations organizations.

Bradley Gallant v. The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, 2016 HRTO 545

Christine Ashton

8 cases2013–2023

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 25, 2016

Summary hearing request to dismiss discrimination application denied due to conflicting facts requiring full evidentiary record.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression, after the respondent rejected her request to establish a scholarship for LGBT youth at its annual awards ceremony.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application, arguing it did not provide a service and that there was no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss, finding that the issue of whether the respondent provided a 'service' under the Human Rights Code required a full evidentiary record, and that conflicting facts and credibility issues precluded a finding of no reasonable prospect of success.

The matter was ordered to proceed to a merits hearing.

Cameron v. Hamilton Black History Committee, 2016 HRTO 541

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2016

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant merely repeated previous arguments without meeting required criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant argued that the decision should be reconsidered under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant merely repeated the same arguments made in her original application and failed to explain how her request met the criteria for reconsideration.

Puharich v. Hamilton (City), 2016 HRTO 526

Felix Lau

8 cases2008–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 15, 2016

Request for written hearing as medical accommodation denied to preserve respondent's right to cross-examination.

The applicant requested that her human rights hearing be conducted in writing as an accommodation for health reasons.

The respondent objected, arguing it would be deprived of the opportunity to cross-examine the applicant on disputed factual issues.

The Tribunal denied the request for a written hearing, finding that proceeding without oral testimony would violate the Human Rights Code, the Tribunal's Rules, and procedural fairness.

The in-person hearing was adjourned until the applicant is medically cleared to participate.

Kwan v. Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2016 HRTO 486

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 8, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to status update request.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of a WSIB proceeding.

The Tribunal sent a letter requesting a status update and warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond within the 30-day timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Baranyai v. Forrest Mechanical Inc., 2016 HRTO 446

Page 4 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 4 of 29 (567 cases)