Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Christine Lundy, Anne Marsden, Kate Hughes.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Kerri Kitchura

21 cases2003–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2014

Request to re-activate deferred human rights application denied as grievance process remained ongoing.

The applicant requested to re-activate her human rights application, which had previously been deferred pending the conclusion of a grievance process.

The respondents opposed the request, noting that the grievances had proceeded to Step 3 and were anticipated to be referred to arbitration.

The Tribunal found it inappropriate to re-activate the application while the grievance process was ongoing and ordered that the application remain deferred.

Lily Burke v. City of Toronto, Mary Lynn Johnston and Raki Khalil, 2014 HRTO 1415

Jessica Fenson

1 case2014–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2014

Reconsideration request dismissed as the underlying interim decision was not a final decision.

The respondent requested a reconsideration of an interim decision.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that under Rule 26.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, only final decisions that dispose of central issues in the application can be reconsidered.

As the interim decision did not dispose of central issues, it could not be the subject of a reconsideration request.

Dias v. Cineplex Inc., 2014 HRTO 1407

Tribunal orders respondent to produce arguably relevant documents in employment discrimination application.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking the production of various documents from the respondent in a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and age.

The Tribunal found that the requested documents, including property manager reports, bookkeeping records, cancelled cheques, Board meeting minutes, and financial statements, were arguably relevant to the issues in dispute.

The respondent was ordered to produce the requested documents.

Andrusiek v. Waakohnsuk Native Non-Profit Homes Inc., 2014 HRTO 1406

Maria Kotsopoulos

In Private Practice18 cases2009–2024

Jeremy Richler

3 cases2013–2021

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 15, 2014

Human rights application dismissed; condominium corporation's enforcement of signage rules was not discriminatory.

The applicant, a restaurant owner of South American origin, alleged that the respondent condominium corporation and property management company discriminated against him on the basis of ethnic origin, national origin, and race.

He claimed the respondents selectively enforced condominium rules regarding temporary signage, changed the voting procedure for Declaration amendments to prevent his expansion, delayed his permanent signage approval, and failed to cut grass near his unit.

The Tribunal found that the respondents had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for their actions, such as enforcing a uniform signage plan across all units and following a vote by owners to change the amendment procedure.

The application was dismissed as the applicant failed to establish a nexus between the adverse treatment and a protected Code ground.

Carol v. Shiu Pong Management Limited, 2014 HRTO 1359

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 11, 2014

Tribunal proceeds with application in default after respondent fails to file a response.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination based on race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving notice and a previous Interim Decision directing him to do so.

Pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal deemed the respondent to have accepted all allegations and waived his right to participate, and ordered the matter to proceed to a hearing without the respondent's participation.

Sharma v. Benoit, 2014 HRTO 1347

Ted Kovacs

29 cases1996–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 11, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as untimely; applicant failed to establish good faith reason for two-year delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination over two years after he was not hired for a human resources position.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed as untimely.

The Tribunal found that the application was filed outside the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to establish a good faith reason for the delay, as he was aware of the relevant facts at the time of the incident and a later conversation with the respondent's president did not add to the factual matrix.

The application was dismissed for delay.

Furtney v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2014 HRTO 1343

Julie O’Donnell

16 cases2000–2022

Brandin O’Connor

18 cases2014–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2014

Request for early production of surreptitious audio-recordings denied as premature.

The respondent requested early production of audio-recordings surreptitiously made by the applicant during meetings with the respondent's representatives.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the respondent failed to establish exceptional circumstances to justify early production before the normal disclosure process under Rule 16.

McDonald v. CAA South Central Ontario, 2014 HRTO 1333

Helen Nowak

8 cases2012–2016

Daniel Mayer

5 cases2014–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination, harassment, and reprisal by the respondent employer.

The applicant had also filed several union grievances relating to the same matters.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the outcome of the grievances.

Finding an almost complete overlap between the allegations in the application and the grievances, the Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions.

Thomas v. Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2014 HRTO 1339

Wade Poziomka

55 cases2011–2017

Lorenzo Lisi

In Private Practice16 cases1993–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2014

Deferral request denied as WSIB appeal regarding injury cause is irrelevant to duty to accommodate.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the human rights application pending the outcome of the applicant's WSIB appeal regarding the cause of her workplace injuries.

The respondent also requested particulars regarding the applicant's alleged loss of benefit coverage.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding that the WSIB appeal concerned the cause of the injury, which is irrelevant to the employer's duty to accommodate under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal also denied the request for particulars, noting they related exclusively to remedy and were not necessary for the respondent to file a full response.

Weatherill v. PepsiCo Canada ULC, 2014 HRTO 1337

Robert Dowhan

6 cases2010–2016

K.C. Wysynski

11 cases2014–2018

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2014

Style of cause amended to name condominium corporation instead of its board of directors.

The respondent condominium corporation brought a request for an order during proceedings to amend the style of cause, arguing that its Board of Directors is not a legal entity and cannot be named as a respondent.

The Tribunal agreed and ordered the style of cause amended to name the condominium corporation itself.

The Tribunal also considered whether individual board members should be added as personal respondents.

Applying the Smyth and Persaud factors, the Tribunal found no compelling reason to add the individuals, as the corporation accepted vicarious liability for their actions and the applicant conceded she had no evidence against them personally.

Marsden v. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41, 2014 HRTO 1332

Brenda Stokes Verworn

1 case2014–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 8, 2014

Human rights application dismissed under s. 34(11) due to parallel civil claim and signed release.

The applicant alleged that the respondent school board discriminated against her by refusing to allow an uncertified service dog to attend school.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under s. 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had commenced a parallel civil claim in small claims court and had signed a full and final release settling the matter.

The Tribunal found that the civil claim raised substantially the same facts and issues, and that the signed release further supported dismissal.

The application was dismissed.

R.D. v. District School Board of Niagara, 2014 HRTO 1323

T. Kirk Boyd

3 cases2011–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 8, 2014

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed because no written and signed settlement existed.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging the respondents breached a settlement regarding parking accommodations.

The Tribunal found that no settlement had been agreed to in writing and signed by the parties, as required by section 45.9 of the Human Rights Code.

Consequently, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear the application, and it was dismissed.

Taite v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 91, 2014 HRTO 1325

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 8, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over federal entity and absence of Code nexus.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on various grounds against Health Canada, a residential complex, and an individual doctor.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that Health Canada is a federal government department outside its jurisdiction, and that the allegations against the other respondents lacked any connection to a protected ground under the Human Rights Code.

Kalkat v. Health Canada, 2014 HRTO 1321

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 4, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as untimely; ignorance of limitation period is not good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race and place of origin, claiming she was assigned heavy work that led to a workplace injury.

The application was filed more than two and a half years after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant argued she was unaware of the one-year limitation period and had relied on her union and a legal clinic.

The Tribunal found that ignorance of the law and reliance on a union grievance did not constitute a good faith reason for the delay, and dismissed the application as untimely.

Wu v. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1311

Maria Kotsopoulos

In Private Practice18 cases2009–2024

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 4, 2014

Tribunal sets aside order barring respondents' participation, allowing late Response due to insurance approval delays.

The respondents failed to file a Response to a human rights application, leading the Tribunal to issue an interim decision deeming them to have waived their right to participate.

The respondents subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to reverse that decision and permit them to file a late Response.

They explained that the delay was caused by awaiting approval for the retention of counsel from their insurer's legal committee.

The Tribunal found the explanation satisfactory and, in the interests of fairness and due process, set aside the previous order and allowed the respondents to participate.

Streete-Thomas v. Extendicare Guildwood, 2014 HRTO 1307

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 2, 2014

Corporate respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination against a personal and a corporate respondent.

The corporate respondent failed to file a Response.

Despite the personal respondent's counsel advising that the corporate respondent was no longer in business, no formal notice of bankruptcy was received.

After the Tribunal sent a warning letter regarding Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure, the corporate respondent still did not respond.

The Tribunal ordered that the corporate respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the application and waived all rights to further notice or participation.

Jamie Duesling v. David Chretien and DJ’s Pizza and Cafe, 2014 HRTO 1291

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 28, 2014

Request to add Ministry of Labour as a party denied; no Code violation alleged against it.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on sex and family status after the respondent denied her request for parental leave.

The applicant sought to add the Ontario Ministry of Labour as a party, intending to argue that section 48(3) of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 violates the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal denied the request, applying the Smyth test and finding no allegations that Ontario itself violated the Code.

The Tribunal noted that Ontario had received formal notice of the challenge and could seek intervenor status if desired.

McEnroe v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1275

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2014

Human rights complaint regarding special diet allowance dismissed as abandoned after complainant failed to file materials.

The complainant alleged discrimination based on disability regarding the special diet allowance under Ontario's social assistance system.

The Tribunal previously directed the complainant to provide materials supporting his claims related to cardiovascular disease and Hepatitis C. The complainant failed to file any materials or communicate with the Tribunal.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the remaining claims as abandoned.

Salnave Saint-Bonheur v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2014 HRTO 1210

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2014

Human rights complaint regarding special diet allowance dismissed as abandoned after complainant failed to file materials.

The complainant alleged discrimination based on disability regarding the special diet allowance under Ontario's social assistance system.

In a previous interim decision, the Tribunal directed the complainant to file certain materials to proceed with claims related to extreme obesity and cardiovascular disease, warning that failure to do so would result in the claims being dismissed as abandoned.

The complainant failed to file the required materials or communicate with the Tribunal.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the remaining claims as abandoned.

Edwards v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2014 HRTO 1209

Maria Kotsolpoulos

1 case2014–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 12, 2014

Respondents' request to dismiss application for late disclosure denied as applicant provided sufficient notice.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal dismiss the application due to the applicant's failure to comply with the Tribunal's directions and Rules of Procedure regarding disclosure.

Following a final direction, the applicant disclosed the intended documents and an affidavit of his intended evidence.

The Tribunal found that the affidavit provided sufficient notice to the respondents of the case they had to meet.

The request to dismiss the application was denied.

Alvaro Jose Carol v. York Region Standard Condominum Corporation 1190 and Shiu Pong Management Ltd, 2014 HRTO 1205

Page 23 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alex HenrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brandon DurantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christian FenkamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hala MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance
Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Patricia MurrayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
David SpearsCounsel
1 appearance
Dean AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas SulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Drago BanjavcicAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 23 of 39 (761 cases)

Kerri Kitchura

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lily Burke v. City of Toronto, Mary Lynn Johnston and Raki Khalil, 2014 HRTO 1415

Jessica Fenson

Jo-Anne Pickel

Dias v. Cineplex Inc., 2014 HRTO 1407

Rejean Parise

Christopher Robertson

Jo-Anne Pickel

Andrusiek v. Waakohnsuk Native Non-Profit Homes Inc., 2014 HRTO 1406

Maria Kotsopoulos

Jeremy Richler

Jo-Anne Pickel

Carol v. Shiu Pong Management Limited, 2014 HRTO 1359

Jo-Anne Pickel

Sharma v. Benoit, 2014 HRTO 1347

Ted Kovacs

Jo-Anne Pickel

Furtney v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2014 HRTO 1343

Julie O’Donnell

Brandin O’Connor

Jo-Anne Pickel

McDonald v. CAA South Central Ontario, 2014 HRTO 1333

Helen Nowak

Daniel Mayer

Jo-Anne Pickel

Thomas v. Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2014 HRTO 1339

Wade Poziomka

Lorenzo Lisi

Jo-Anne Pickel

Weatherill v. PepsiCo Canada ULC, 2014 HRTO 1337

Robert Dowhan

K.C. Wysynski

Jo-Anne Pickel

Marsden v. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41, 2014 HRTO 1332

Brenda Stokes Verworn

Jo-Anne Pickel

R.D. v. District School Board of Niagara, 2014 HRTO 1323

T. Kirk Boyd

Jo-Anne Pickel

Taite v. Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 91, 2014 HRTO 1325

Jo-Anne Pickel

Kalkat v. Health Canada, 2014 HRTO 1321

Jo-Anne Pickel

Wu v. Maple Lodge Farms Ltd., 2014 HRTO 1311

Maria Kotsopoulos

Jo-Anne Pickel

Streete-Thomas v. Extendicare Guildwood, 2014 HRTO 1307

Jo-Anne Pickel

Jamie Duesling v. David Chretien and DJ’s Pizza and Cafe, 2014 HRTO 1291

Jo-Anne Pickel

McEnroe v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2014 HRTO 1275

Jo-Anne Pickel

Salnave Saint-Bonheur v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2014 HRTO 1210

Jo-Anne Pickel

Edwards v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2014 HRTO 1209

Maria Kotsolpoulos

Jo-Anne Pickel

Alvaro Jose Carol v. York Region Standard Condominum Corporation 1190 and Shiu Pong Management Ltd, 2014 HRTO 1205

Affected Party

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Respondents

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

for Fera Zubaidy

for First Canada ULC

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

for herself