The defendant brought a threshold motion during jury deliberations in a motor vehicle personal injury action, seeking a declaration that the plaintiff's injuries did not meet the statutory threshold under s. 267.5(5) of the Insurance Act.
The plaintiff claimed to suffer from chronic pain syndrome resulting from a minor rear-end collision.
The court preferred the evidence of the defendant's medical expert and relied heavily on video surveillance showing the plaintiff engaging in vigorous physical activities inconsistent with her claimed limitations.
The court found the plaintiff failed to prove a permanent, serious impairment of an important physical function.
Consequently, the jury's award of $50,000 for general damages was disallowed, and judgment was entered only for the $32,000 awarded for past loss of housekeeping services.