Who is Geneviève Debané?

Geneviève Debané is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Geneviève Debané sit on?

Geneviève Debané sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Geneviève Debané decide?

Geneviève Debané's most common areas include Human Rights (487 decisions), Administrative Law (164 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (138 decisions). Geneviève Debané has handled 487 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Geneviève Debané made?

Geneviève Debané has 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016.

Who frequently appears before Geneviève Debané?

Representatives who frequently appear before Geneviève Debané include Self-represented, Mafario Amicucci, Nepthys Aberdeen.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Geneviève Debané — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Geneviève Debané

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2011

487

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 386Adjudicator· 48Vice-chair· 24Vice-présidente· 23Adjudicator· 3Arbitre· 1

Howard Goldblatt

In Private Practice99 cases1984–2025

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 14, 2014

Intervenor status granted to union; summary hearing directed to assess reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged age discrimination regarding his entitlement to early retirement benefits under an Interest Arbitration Board decision.

The Toronto Professional Firefighters' Association requested to intervene, which was granted as unopposed.

The Tribunal, on its own initiative, directed a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success, lack of jurisdiction, or because the substance was appropriately dealt with by the Interest Arbitration Board.

Douglas Brooks v. City of Toronto, 2014 HRTO 690

Walter T. Langley

12 cases1986–2019

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2014

Tribunal refuses to dismiss or defer human rights application pending WSIB proceedings regarding work-relatedness of disability.

The respondent requested that the human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code or deferred, arguing that the substance of the application was dealt with by the WSIB.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss, finding that the WSIB only determined whether the disabilities were work-related, whereas the Code requires accommodation regardless of cause.

The Tribunal also denied the request to defer, concluding that the WSIB proceeding would not address the accommodation issue and any overlap in damages could be addressed by either body.

Leduc v. Canadian Stebbins Engineering, 2014 HRTO 628

Andrea York

7 cases2008–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending OLRB proceeding; applicant ordered to file legible application.

The respondent requested an order to defer the human rights application pending the conclusion of a concurrent proceeding before the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The respondent also requested that the applicant be ordered to provide a legible copy of his handwritten application.

The Tribunal granted both requests, finding that deferral was appropriate to avoid inconsistent decisions, and ordered the applicant to file a legible application within 28 days.

Reynolds v. Nestle Waters Canada, 2014 HRTO 617

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Story v. Shaver, 2014 HRTO 612

Cézanne Charlebois

8 cases2010–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2014

Adjournment request denied; retaining unavailable new counsel does not constitute exceptional circumstances.

The respondent requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing on the basis that it had retained new counsel who was unavailable during the week of the hearing.

The applicant opposed the request.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario denied the adjournment, finding that the respondent's retention of unavailable counsel did not constitute exceptional circumstances justifying an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

Duffie v. Wesbell Technologies Inc., 2014 HRTO 613

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 29, 2014

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with Case Assessment Direction.

The applicant filed multiple applications alleging discrimination with respect to employment on the basis of sex.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to file witness statements, documents, and written submissions.

The applicant failed to comply with the directions and was warned that the applications could be dismissed as abandoned.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had abandoned the applications and dismissed them.

De Bousquet v. Mars Car Rental, 2014 HRTO 602

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for being filed beyond the one-year limitation period without good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed beyond the one-year time limit.

The Tribunal found that the last incident of alleged discrimination occurred on September 12, 2012, making the December 26, 2013 application untimely.

The applicant provided no explanation for the delay, failing to establish that it was incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Kibale v. Metro Store, 2014 HRTO 558

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 17, 2014

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicants failed to attend summary hearing.

Three consolidated human rights applications were scheduled for a summary hearing via telephone conference.

The applicants failed to attend the hearing and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain their absence.

The Tribunal dismissed the applications on the basis that they were deemed to have been abandoned.

Campbell v. Durham District School Board, 2014 HRTO 553

David M. Bolger

4 cases1991–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 14, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending the outcome of concurrent grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging his employment was terminated due to his ethnic origin and as a reprisal.

The Tribunal noted that the applicant had seven outstanding grievances scheduled for arbitration that significantly overlapped with the human rights allegations.

The respondent consented to deferring the application, while the applicant did not provide submissions.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process to avoid concurrent proceedings and contradictory findings.

Abderrazak Bannari c. Université d’Ottawa, 2014 HRTO 539

Israel Balter

In Private Practice11 cases1997–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 14, 2014

Application against federal undertaking dismissed; s. 45.1 dismissal denied as prior ESA proceeding did not address human rights.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of age and disability against Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd. and Rogers Communications Partnership.

Rogers requested dismissal on the basis that it is a federal undertaking.

Eastern requested dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Code, arguing that an Employment Standards Officer's decision awarding the applicant termination pay appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against Rogers for lack of jurisdiction.

However, the Tribunal denied Eastern's request to dismiss, finding that the employment standards proceeding did not address the applicant's human rights claims.

Chowdhry v. Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd., 2014 HRTO 534

Marc Rodrigue

3 cases2014–2021

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 8, 2014

Tribunal refuses to dismiss human rights application based on prior long-term disability insurance determinations.

The respondent requested that the human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code, arguing the substance was dealt with by the applicant's long-term disability insurer and the WSIB.

The Tribunal held that an insurance provider's internal process is not a 'proceeding' under the Code and denied the request to dismiss on that basis.

The Tribunal deferred the WSIB overlap issue to the hearing on the merits and denied the respondent's request for a summary hearing, finding factual disputes required evidence.

Miguel Zevallos v. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2014 HRTO 489

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 4, 2014

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria and attempted to re-argue case.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26, as the request merely sought to re-argue issues already decided.

The Tribunal also noted several inaccurate statements made by the applicant regarding the original hearing.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Riad v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2014 HRTO 465

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 4, 2014

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to establish threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

He alleged the Tribunal failed to consider relevant information, sent contradictory letters, and pressured him into speaking English during the summary hearing.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was offered interpretation services but chose to speak English, the letters were administrative and clarified by the Registrar, and the applicant failed to provide evidence linking his complaints to an act of reprisal.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Bouzid v. Woodchester Nissan Inc., 2014 HRTO 472

Andrew Zabrovsky

32 cases2010–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 3, 2014

Request to add personal respondents denied where corporate respondent acknowledged vicarious liability; amendment of damages allowed.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the Town of Ajax and subsequently brought a Request for an Order during Proceedings to add three individuals as personal respondents and to amend the remedies sought.

The Tribunal denied the request to add the personal respondents, finding no allegations against two of them and noting the Town acknowledged vicarious liability for the third.

The Tribunal allowed the request to amend the application to increase monetary damages but denied the request to add a specific future compliance remedy.

Zalter v. Corporation of the Town of Ajax, 2014 HRTO 464

Noëlle Caloren

2 cases2014–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2014

Requête pour discrimination et harcèlement rejetée; les allégations de complot n'avaient aucun fondement raisonnable.

Le requérant, un enseignant, a déposé une requête alléguant avoir été victime de harcèlement, de discrimination et de représailles fondés sur la race, la couleur, le lieu d'origine, la citoyenneté et la croyance de la part du conseil scolaire et de certains de ses employés.

Il prétendait être la cible d'un complot complexe orchestré par le directeur de l'école.

Le Tribunal a conclu que les allégations de complot n'avaient aucun fondement raisonnable et que le requérant interprétait à tort les interactions avec ses collègues et les élèves.

Bien qu'un commentaire raciste ait vraisemblablement été fait par le directeur à une représentante syndicale, ce commentaire n'a pas été adressé au requérant et ne constituait pas du harcèlement au sens du Code.

La requête a été rejetée.

Karimou Dia Hantchi c. Conseil scolaire public du Grand Nord de l’Ontario, 2014 HRTO 451

Mary Kokokis

1 case2014–2014

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2014

Application reactivated after WSIB proceeding; request to dismiss deferred to merits hearing.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application following the conclusion of a related WSIB proceeding.

The respondents requested to dismiss the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing it had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate and deferred the request to dismiss to the hearing on the merits, finding that determining the overlapping issues at a preliminary hearing would not be an efficient use of resources.

Deborah Hannis v. Blackadar Continuing Care Centre and Extendicare Assist Management & Consulting Services, 2014 HRTO 426

Michelle D. MacGillivray

3 cases2005–2015

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of overlapping grievance arbitration process.

The corporate respondent requested to defer the human rights application pending the conclusion of an ongoing grievance arbitration process.

The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing it was requested in bad faith and that the arbitration would not address the human rights allegations.

The Tribunal found substantial overlap between the facts and allegations in both proceedings and deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and contrary findings, noting that grievance arbitrators have the responsibility to enforce human rights statutes.

Jongazma v. Saputo Dairy Products Canada G.P., 2014 HRTO 415

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID despite an extension of time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Paul O’Connor v. Traymore Apartments, 2014 HRTO 411

Gail Geronimo

18 cases2013–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2014

Respondents' request to amend their Response granted as it was timely and caused no prejudice.

The respondents filed a Request for an Order During Proceeding to amend their Response to an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The Tribunal granted the request under Rule 1.7 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, finding that the amendment was brought in a timely manner, would not delay the proceedings, and would not prejudice the applicant.

Mariusz Beres v. Toronto District School Board and Anthony Vandyke, 2014 HRTO 399

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2014

Applicant's request for early production of documents denied as premature.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order during Proceedings seeking the early production of numerous documents.

The respondent opposed the request as premature.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that early production is only ordered in exceptional circumstances, which were not present here.

Cesare Pella v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board and William Osler Health System, 2014 HRTO 406

Page 11 of 25 (487 cases)

Applicant

Richard ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BoyerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cesare PellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guillaume KibaleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc BourguignonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ezra TaylorSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheri DaviesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lilly WiddisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marvin LagaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chatebadhur BalchandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Senan HodonouSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DavisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lewis CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
Renu VermaSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Lydia SabourinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Fatema DadaCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Michael DoupeCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher M. WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea YorkCounsel
1 appearance
Rina M. LiCounsel
1 appearance
Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance
Rani KhanCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers, Local 444

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd.

Meaghan RussellCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 146

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for Cassellholme for the Aged

Lise EllisCounsel
1 appearance

for Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc.

Clifford J. HartCounsel
1 appearance

for Collin & Diana Parker Sales Ltd.

Arthur P. TarasukCounsel
1 appearance

for David Mirvish

Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Proposed Intervenor

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd.

Jason WhiteAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Justin StylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald HarpelleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russel RamlochanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IATSE Local 822 (Toronto), IATSE Local 58 (Toronto), IATSE 129 (Hamilton), IATSE 461 Niagara, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Matthew D. Loeb, and Blair Egglestone

Andrea BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Marks Work Wearhouse Ltd., Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited and Donna Lodu

S. John PageCounsel
1 appearance

former representative for Mr. Liu

Kenny YauParalegal
1 appearance

for Pegasus Hospitality Group

Markos MarkoulisAgent
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Partnership

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

D.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
9 appearances
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
4 appearances
Nepthys AberdeenSelf-represented
4 appearances
Eric SabbahAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Jean-Alexandre De BousquetSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
3 appearances
Jean-Yves BernardSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rigaud BastienSelf-represented
3 appearances
Nagy RiadSelf-represented
3 appearances
Anthony HicksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Stevie Massela SikouSelf-represented
2 appearances
Keith AllenAgent
2 appearances
Joel ShusterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Abdullah MozaffarianSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
2 appearances
Malek BouraouiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leonard KerriganAgent
2 appearances
Rani KhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Doug MacCleodCounsel
1 appearance
A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Myles Currie, Hector Moreno, Trevor Tenn, Ted MacMillan and John Murphy

Omo AkintanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario

Stephanie HobbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Barry KuretzkyCounsel
3 appearances
Samantha LambCounsel
2 appearances
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
2 appearances
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance
Danielle BisnarCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
J. Craig MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Rochelle FoxCounsel
1 appearance
Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance
Michele Hamilton MeyersCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher PerriCounsel
1 appearance
Natalie WileyCounsel
1 appearance
John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa LeinveerAgent
1 appearance
Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Judith ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Judicial Counsel

Geri SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Gregory KoCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea LueyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Colin JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Joanna S. RainbowCounsel
3 appearances
Frank AngelettiCounsel
3 appearances
Ted KovacsCounsel
3 appearances
Newton WongCounsel
2 appearances
Christine EntaCounsel
2 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Margot BlightCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Judith ParkerCounsel
2 appearances
Lia ChiarottoCounsel
2 appearances
Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Michael WillsCounsel
2 appearances
Rob LevesqueAgent
1 appearance
Lise EllisAgent
1 appearance
Keri BennettCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BellCounsel
1 appearance
Xavier NavarreteCounsel
1 appearance
Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ARAMARK Canada Ltd.

George MacMasterAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association de la police de l'Ontario

Michele Hamilton MayersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BramCity Taxi

Ron FolkesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil scolaire de district Catholique Centre-Sud

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Daiva Lenauskus

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dresden Industrial

Sven PoysaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Samantha CrumbCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eaton Chelsea Hotel

Donna D’AndreaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd

Tina BaldwinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hôpital Montfort

André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joanne Euler

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Le Syndicat Canadien de la fonction Publique et sa section locale 3189

Jean-Michel CorbeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent London Police Service

Frank A. AngelettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community and Social Services

Benjamin ParryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Minto Properties Inc.

Maria MavrikkouCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario College of Teachers

Lai-King HumCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police

Iain AspenliederCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

Sonia PhilipszAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
2 appearances
Justin BasingerCounsel
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Neena GuptaCounsel
1 appearance
John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie BacherCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer RothSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela WakewichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meredith GaydaCounsel
1 appearance
Sheila C. HandlerCounsel
1 appearance
Kristin BurnettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mana KhamiCounsel
1 appearance
Mario DelgadoCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl RovisCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia JasenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents 1960 Keel Investments Inc., Ira Marder, Shirley Marder, Michael Sosnowicz, Shlomo Marder, David Dunn, Merle Stein, David Rubin, Michael Harari, Iggy Florez, Marbrook Developments Limited, and D&D Associates Paralegal

David RubinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens and Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4721

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sharon Galway

Vilija YcasAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union No. 540

Aaron HartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP and Julie Skinner

Sean McGeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Provincial Police and Wayne Morris

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Résidence St. Louis (Bruyère Soins Continus) and Nicole McEachren

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of Peel and Mark Castro

Chantel MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ottawa Hospital

Raquel ChisolmCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toyota Motor Manufacturing Inc.

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 333

Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Cheryl FoyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Zeta Psi Social Fraternity

Kim DuongCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 416 and Alex Krebelj

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Wendy Benson

David DeluzioCounsel
1 appearance

for William Osler Health Systems

Melanie de WitCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend

M.D.Agent
1 appearance

on behalf of Danny Liu

Vartan ManoukianCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of herself and J.P

V.P.Self-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Navneet SinghSelf-represented
1 appearance

on the applicant's behalf

Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

pour la requérante

Lyne DrapeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Odile CoiminSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylia ArsenaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kibondo Max KilongoziCounsel
1 appearance
Bernadette KanyindaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chantal TieCounsel
1 appearance

pour le requérant

Karimou Dia HantchiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.A. Gilles FortinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stéphane VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour les intimées

Sébastien HuardCounsel
1 appearance

pour les intimés

Noëlle CalorenCounsel
1 appearance
Christine LonsdaleCounsel
1 appearance
André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance
Gabriel PoliquinCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intervenant

Benjamin PiperCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé

Marc DelormeCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée

Jean-Rodrigue YobouaCounsel
1 appearance
David M. BolgerCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée Joanne David

Kevin MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée proposée

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé proposé

Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureur

Owen M. ReesCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureurs

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance
Claire VachonCounsel
1 appearance

Representative

Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance

Representative, Self-represented

A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrew N. ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance
Danny LiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented

Hong Bing (Richard) WangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mazigh MassylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jaime CastellanosSelf-represented
1 appearance

se représentant lui-même

Ronald GariepySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représentant lui-même

Étienne MouajouSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représente lui-même

Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance

487

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.1

cases/mo

HRTO487(100%)

Decision types

motion

465

trial

Page 11 of 25 (487 cases)