Who is Geneviève Debané?

Geneviève Debané is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Geneviève Debané sit on?

Geneviève Debané sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Geneviève Debané decide?

Geneviève Debané's most common areas include Human Rights (487 decisions), Administrative Law (164 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (138 decisions). Geneviève Debané has handled 487 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Geneviève Debané made?

Geneviève Debané has 487 decisions on record from 2011 to 2016.

Who frequently appears before Geneviève Debané?

Representatives who frequently appear before Geneviève Debané include Self-represented, Mafario Amicucci, Nepthys Aberdeen.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Geneviève Debané — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Workers' Compensation

Geneviève Debané

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2011

487

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 386Adjudicator· 48Vice-chair· 24Vice-présidente· 23Adjudicator· 3Arbitre· 1

Natalie Wiley

1 case2016–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for delay and because termination was previously adjudicated at arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex and sexual orientation, citing washroom graffiti and his subsequent termination.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed for delay and under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the termination allegation had been appropriately dealt with in a prior grievance arbitration that upheld the dismissal.

The Tribunal further found that the harassment allegations were distinct from the termination, fell outside the one-year time limit, and lacked a good faith explanation for the delay.

The application was dismissed.

Archibald v. Cancoil Thermal Corporation, 2016 HRTO 867

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 28, 2016

Request for reconsideration of interim decision dismissed as premature; recusal motion denied.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that denied a request for an interim remedy, and also brought a motion for the adjudicator to recuse herself.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration because the interim decision was not a final decision that disposed of the central issues in the complaint.

The Tribunal also declined the recusal motion, finding no reasonable apprehension of bias.

T.B. v. Eastern Ontario District School Board, 2016 HRTO 859

Human rights application dismissed mid-hearing as applicant's evidence of discrimination was based entirely on speculation.

The applicant alleged that her employment was terminated because of her family status, marital status, age, and association with a person identified by these grounds, specifically relating to her need to care for her autistic son.

After the applicant testified at the hearing on the merits, the adjudicator directed submissions on whether the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient particularized evidence regarding her attendance issues, childcare needs, or the transfer of work to a younger employee.

Concluding that the applicant's theory of discrimination was based entirely on speculation and conjecture, the Tribunal dismissed the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Khaldi v. TBM Holdco Ltd./Tim-BR Mart, 2016 HRTO 851

George Vuicic

11 cases2000–2017

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 24, 2016

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant failed to satisfy criteria and attempted to re-argue case.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application against the Ontario New Democratic Party and James Pratt.

The applicant alleged factual errors regarding the respondent and the Federal NDP, and raised new allegations not included in the original application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was attempting to re-argue his case and make new allegations, failing to satisfy any of the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Hervé Ngamby v. Ontario New Democratic Party and James Pratt, 2016 HRTO 855

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 20, 2016

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant merely attempted to re-argue her case.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application.

She argued that there were new facts and that the Tribunal erred in allowing certain individuals to represent the corporate respondent at the hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant was attempting to re-argue her case, the alleged new facts could have been obtained earlier and would not change the result, and the representation issue was not a valid basis for reconsideration.

Hannona v. Paul S. Pollock Enterprises Ltd. o/a Canadian Tire Store 006, 2016 HRTO 828

Stephen A. Bernofsky

13 cases2001–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 20, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success; employer questioning vacation request not discriminatory.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of disability after his employer questioned him about a vacation request.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Finding that the employer's questioning was a routine managerial inquiry with no adverse consequences, and that there was no evidence linking the questioning to the applicant's disability, the Tribunal dismissed the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Sisay Assefa v. Clarendon Foundation, 2016 HRTO 831

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2016

Reconsideration request denied; applicant failed to provide medical evidence justifying delay in filing.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her application for being filed outside the one-year limitation period under the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued there were new facts and that the decision conflicted with established case law, asserting that her traumatized mental state prevented timely filing.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding the applicant was merely rearguing her case and failed to provide medical evidence establishing a causal link between her disability and the delay.

Burton v. Family and Children’s Services of Guelph and Wellington County, 2016 HRTO 814

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 7, 2016

Request for interim remedy to enforce student accommodation plan denied pending hearing on the merits.

The applicant filed an application alleging that the respondent college discriminated against him because of disability and reprised against him, specifically failing to accommodate his disability in accordance with his student accommodation plan.

The applicant sought an interim remedy to enforce the accommodation plan.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the balance of harm or convenience did not favour granting the interim remedy, as the accommodation plan was subject to interpretation and required evidence to be heard on the merits.

Bradley Truax v. George Brown College, 2016 HRTO 769

Andre R. Nowakowski

1 case2016–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 2, 2016

Human rights application against emergency shelter dismissed at summary hearing for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination with respect to services because of ethnic origin, creed, and reprisal contrary to the Human Rights Code, following his eviction from an emergency shelter.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations linking his treatment to a prohibited ground were pure speculation and belief, and that the majority of his complaints related to shelter conditions and municipal by-laws outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Nemmour v. The Scott Mission Emergency Shelter, 2016 HRTO 757

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2016

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicants failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicants filed human rights applications which were deferred pending the conclusion of other proceedings.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicants to confirm the status of those proceedings and their intentions regarding their applications.

Three of the applicants failed to respond to the direction.

The Tribunal deemed their applications abandoned and dismissed them.

Cushnie v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 727

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2016

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria and merely repeated bias allegations.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that dismissed the application in part, alleging personal and institutional bias.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, as the submissions merely repeated arguments previously made and addressed.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

T.B. v. Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario, 2016 HRTO 726

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional issue.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed on the basis that the issues raised fell within exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to respond to this jurisdictional issue by filing a Form 11.

The applicant failed to file the form by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Kristy Collinge v. Distribution Nordix Inc. and Pierre-Paul Dufour, 2016 HRTO 714

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2016

Human rights application alleging elaborate criminal conspiracy by prospective employers dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code alleging that the respondents, who were unrelated employers, were involved in an elaborate criminal conspiracy and 'employment fraud' after he was denied interviews or not contacted.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The Tribunal found that the application described events unrelated to the respondents, contained offensive language, and alleged a criminal conspiracy controlled by the government or a terrorist cell.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, concluding it was plain and obvious that the issues did not fall within its jurisdiction.

Sajjad Asghar v. 3K Consulting Inc. et al., 2016 HRTO 717

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled by telephone conference, and the applicant was provided with notice.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the absence.

Consequently, the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Antonio Marcu v. Benjamin Lawrence, 2016 HRTO 645

George Viucic

1 case2016–2016

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2016

Human rights application alleging political conspiracy and fabricated sexual harassment claims dismissed as speculative.

The applicant, a former political candidate for the respondent party, alleged discrimination and reprisal after being excluded from a meeting and subsequently facing sexual harassment allegations from a volunteer.

The applicant claimed the party conspired to fabricate the allegations to ruin his political career.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding the applicant's claims were based on pure speculation and had no reasonable prospect of success.

Hervé Ngamby v. Ontario New Democratic Party and James Pratt, 2016 HRTO 641

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2016

Requests for interim remedy and to expedite human rights application regarding hockey team selection denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on family status, claiming her son was cut from a hockey team due to issues involving his father.

The applicant requested an interim order preventing the team from making final selections and sought to expedite the application.

The Tribunal denied both requests, finding that an interim remedy would not further the objectives of the Code and the balance of harm favoured denying it, and that the circumstances were not truly urgent to warrant expediting the process.

B.G. v. Central Ontario Wolves Hockey Association, 2016 HRTO 588

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2016

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed his human rights application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged continued attacks by police informants and attempted to reargue his case.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5 and dismissed the request.

Ruminder Kalkat v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 532

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to confirm his intention to proceed and to file a Reply.

The applicant failed to comply with the directives within the specified time.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Maisonneuve v. Elgin Street Mission, 2016 HRTO 528

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed; record of offences is not a protected ground in services.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in services based on her record of offences, claiming the Ministry of Transportation improperly imposed conditions on her driver's license due to a prior criminal conviction in Quebec.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss and ultimately dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal held that 'record of offences' is not a prohibited ground of discrimination with respect to services under the Human Rights Code.

Furthermore, the applicant did not meet the statutory definition of having a 'record of offences' because she had not received a pardon for her criminal conviction.

France Lachapelle v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Transportation, 2016 HRTO 473

Geneviève Debané

HRTO0 cases2011–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 5, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to file hearing documents.

The applicant failed to file hearing documents and witness statements by the extended deadline of March 18, 2016, despite a warning from the Tribunal that failure to do so could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing.

Lavigne v. Health Sciences North/Horizon Santé-Nord, 2016 HRTO 425

Page 1 of 25 (487 cases)

Applicant

Richard ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BoyerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cesare PellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guillaume KibaleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc BourguignonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ezra TaylorSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheri DaviesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lilly WiddisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marvin LagaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chatebadhur BalchandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Senan HodonouSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DavisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lewis CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
Renu VermaSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Lydia SabourinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Fatema DadaCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Michael DoupeCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher M. WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea YorkCounsel
1 appearance
Rina M. LiCounsel
1 appearance
Chris DonszelmannCounsel
1 appearance
Rani KhanCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Auto Workers, Local 444

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd.

Meaghan RussellCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 146

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for Cassellholme for the Aged

Lise EllisCounsel
1 appearance

for Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc.

Clifford J. HartCounsel
1 appearance

for Collin & Diana Parker Sales Ltd.

Arthur P. TarasukCounsel
1 appearance

for David Mirvish

Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Proposed Intervenor

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd.

Jason WhiteAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Justin StylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald HarpelleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russel RamlochanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for IATSE Local 822 (Toronto), IATSE Local 58 (Toronto), IATSE 129 (Hamilton), IATSE 461 Niagara, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Matthew D. Loeb, and Blair Egglestone

Andrea BowkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Marks Work Wearhouse Ltd., Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited and Donna Lodu

S. John PageCounsel
1 appearance

former representative for Mr. Liu

Kenny YauParalegal
1 appearance

for Pegasus Hospitality Group

Markos MarkoulisAgent
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Partnership

Israel BalterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

D.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
9 appearances
Mafario AmicucciSelf-represented
4 appearances
Nepthys AberdeenSelf-represented
4 appearances
Eric SabbahAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Jean-Alexandre De BousquetSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
3 appearances
Jean-Yves BernardSelf-represented
3 appearances
Rigaud BastienSelf-represented
3 appearances
Nagy RiadSelf-represented
3 appearances
Anthony HicksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Stevie Massela SikouSelf-represented
2 appearances
Keith AllenAgent
2 appearances
Joel ShusterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Abdullah MozaffarianSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
2 appearances
Malek BouraouiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leonard KerriganAgent
2 appearances
Rani KhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Doug MacCleodCounsel
1 appearance
A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Myles Currie, Hector Moreno, Trevor Tenn, Ted MacMillan and John Murphy

Omo AkintanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario

Stephanie HobbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Barry KuretzkyCounsel
3 appearances
Samantha LambCounsel
2 appearances
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
2 appearances
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance
Danielle BisnarCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
J. Craig MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Rochelle FoxCounsel
1 appearance
Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance
Michele Hamilton MeyersCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher PerriCounsel
1 appearance
Natalie WileyCounsel
1 appearance
John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa LeinveerAgent
1 appearance
Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

Colin YoungmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Judith ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Judicial Counsel

Geri SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Gregory KoCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea LueyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Colin JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Joanna S. RainbowCounsel
3 appearances
Frank AngelettiCounsel
3 appearances
Ted KovacsCounsel
3 appearances
Newton WongCounsel
2 appearances
Christine EntaCounsel
2 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Margot BlightCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Judith ParkerCounsel
2 appearances
Lia ChiarottoCounsel
2 appearances
Stephen MaioCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
2 appearances
Michael WillsCounsel
2 appearances
Rob LevesqueAgent
1 appearance
Lise EllisAgent
1 appearance
Keri BennettCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BellCounsel
1 appearance
Xavier NavarreteCounsel
1 appearance
Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance
Stephen A. BernofskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ARAMARK Canada Ltd.

George MacMasterAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association de la police de l'Ontario

Michele Hamilton MayersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BramCity Taxi

Ron FolkesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

Victor HuoAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil scolaire de district Catholique Centre-Sud

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Daiva Lenauskus

Andrew McCutcheonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dresden Industrial

Sven PoysaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Samantha CrumbCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eaton Chelsea Hotel

Donna D’AndreaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd

Tina BaldwinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hôpital Montfort

André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joanne Euler

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Le Syndicat Canadien de la fonction Publique et sa section locale 3189

Jean-Michel CorbeilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent London Police Service

Frank A. AngelettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community and Social Services

Benjamin ParryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Minto Properties Inc.

Maria MavrikkouCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario College of Teachers

Lai-King HumCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police

Iain AspenliederCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

Sonia PhilipszAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances
Sheryl JohnsonCounsel
2 appearances
Justin BasingerCounsel
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Neena GuptaCounsel
1 appearance
John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie BacherCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer RothSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Derek CollinsCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela WakewichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meredith GaydaCounsel
1 appearance
Sheila C. HandlerCounsel
1 appearance
Kristin BurnettSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mana KhamiCounsel
1 appearance
Mario DelgadoCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl RovisCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia JasenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents 1960 Keel Investments Inc., Ira Marder, Shirley Marder, Michael Sosnowicz, Shlomo Marder, David Dunn, Merle Stein, David Rubin, Michael Harari, Iggy Florez, Marbrook Developments Limited, and D&D Associates Paralegal

David RubinAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens and Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4721

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sharon Galway

Vilija YcasAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union No. 540

Aaron HartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP and Julie Skinner

Sean McGeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Provincial Police and Wayne Morris

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Résidence St. Louis (Bruyère Soins Continus) and Nicole McEachren

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of Peel and Mark Castro

Chantel MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher SansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Ottawa Hospital

Raquel ChisolmCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toyota Motor Manufacturing Inc.

Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Local 333

Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Cheryl FoyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Zeta Psi Social Fraternity

Kim DuongCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Civic Employees Union, Local 416 and Alex Krebelj

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for Wendy Benson

David DeluzioCounsel
1 appearance

for William Osler Health Systems

Melanie de WitCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend

M.D.Agent
1 appearance

on behalf of Danny Liu

Vartan ManoukianCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of herself and J.P

V.P.Self-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Navneet SinghSelf-represented
1 appearance

on the applicant's behalf

Susan HoustonAgent
1 appearance

pour la requérante

Lyne DrapeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Odile CoiminSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylia ArsenaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kibondo Max KilongoziCounsel
1 appearance
Bernadette KanyindaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chantal TieCounsel
1 appearance

pour le requérant

Karimou Dia HantchiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance
J.A. Gilles FortinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stéphane VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance

pour les intimées

Sébastien HuardCounsel
1 appearance

pour les intimés

Noëlle CalorenCounsel
1 appearance
Christine LonsdaleCounsel
1 appearance
André ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance
Gabriel PoliquinCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intervenant

Benjamin PiperCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé

Marc DelormeCounsel
1 appearance
Annie BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée

Jean-Rodrigue YobouaCounsel
1 appearance
David M. BolgerCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée Joanne David

Kevin MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimée proposée

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

pour l'intimé proposé

Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureur

Owen M. ReesCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

procureurs

Christian PaquetteCounsel
1 appearance
Claire VachonCounsel
1 appearance

Representative

Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance

Representative, Self-represented

A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrew N. ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance
Danny LiuSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented

Hong Bing (Richard) WangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mazigh MassylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BlommesteynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jaime CastellanosSelf-represented
1 appearance

se représentant lui-même

Ronald GariepySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marc Elie OstainvilSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représentant lui-même

Étienne MouajouSelf-represented
1 appearance

Se représente lui-même

Godfred Kwaku HiameySelf-represented
1 appearance

487

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.1

cases/mo

HRTO487(100%)

Decision types

motion

465

trial

Page 1 of 25 (487 cases)

Natalie Wiley

Geneviève Debané

Archibald v. Cancoil Thermal Corporation, 2016 HRTO 867

Geneviève Debané

T.B. v. Eastern Ontario District School Board, 2016 HRTO 859

Jen Bernardo

Cherrine Chow

Geneviève Debané

Khaldi v. TBM Holdco Ltd./Tim-BR Mart, 2016 HRTO 851

George Vuicic

Geneviève Debané

Hervé Ngamby v. Ontario New Democratic Party and James Pratt, 2016 HRTO 855

Geneviève Debané

Hannona v. Paul S. Pollock Enterprises Ltd. o/a Canadian Tire Store 006, 2016 HRTO 828

Stephen A. Bernofsky

Geneviève Debané

Sisay Assefa v. Clarendon Foundation, 2016 HRTO 831

Geneviève Debané

Burton v. Family and Children’s Services of Guelph and Wellington County, 2016 HRTO 814

Geneviève Debané

Bradley Truax v. George Brown College, 2016 HRTO 769

Andre R. Nowakowski

Geneviève Debané

Nemmour v. The Scott Mission Emergency Shelter, 2016 HRTO 757

Geneviève Debané

Cushnie v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 727

Geneviève Debané

T.B. v. Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario, 2016 HRTO 726

Geneviève Debané

Kristy Collinge v. Distribution Nordix Inc. and Pierre-Paul Dufour, 2016 HRTO 714

Geneviève Debané

Sajjad Asghar v. 3K Consulting Inc. et al., 2016 HRTO 717

Geneviève Debané

Antonio Marcu v. Benjamin Lawrence, 2016 HRTO 645

George Viucic

Geneviève Debané

Hervé Ngamby v. Ontario New Democratic Party and James Pratt, 2016 HRTO 641

Geneviève Debané

B.G. v. Central Ontario Wolves Hockey Association, 2016 HRTO 588

Geneviève Debané

Ruminder Kalkat v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 532

Geneviève Debané

Maisonneuve v. Elgin Street Mission, 2016 HRTO 528

Geneviève Debané

France Lachapelle v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Transportation, 2016 HRTO 473

Geneviève Debané

Lavigne v. Health Sciences North/Horizon Santé-Nord, 2016 HRTO 425

Applicant

Counsel

for Canadian Auto Workers, Local 444

for Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd.

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 146

for Cassellholme for the Aged

for Centum Fundamental Financial Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc.

for Collin & Diana Parker Sales Ltd.

for David Mirvish

for Dr. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Proposed Intervenor

for Eastern Independent Telecommunications Ltd.

for himself

for IATSE Local 822 (Toronto), IATSE Local 58 (Toronto), IATSE 129 (Hamilton), IATSE 461 Niagara, Cheryl Batulis, Heather Clarkson, Matthew D. Loeb, and Blair Egglestone

for Marks Work Wearhouse Ltd., Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited and Donna Lodu

former representative for Mr. Liu

for Pegasus Hospitality Group

for Rogers Communications Partnership

for the Affected Party

for the applicant

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the City of Toronto, Myles Currie, Hector Moreno, Trevor Tenn, Ted MacMillan and John Murphy

for the Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario

for the Intervenor

for the Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

for the Ontario Judicial Counsel

for the Proposed Intervenor

for the Proposed Respondent

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

for the respondent

for the Respondent