Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to notice regarding signed release.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, gender, and age, claiming she was forced to retire.

The respondent requested early dismissal, producing Minutes of Settlement and a full and final release signed by the applicant.

The Tribunal issued a Notice directing the applicant to respond to the request to dismiss, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to file submissions by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Zeleda Davis v. UNITE HERE Local 75, 2013 HRTO 283

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2013

Tribunal declines to dismiss late-filed application at preliminary stage, finding delay may be justified.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, more than one year after his termination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant submitted that health concerns and elder care responsibilities caused the delay.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction, as the applicant provided enough detail to suggest the delay might have been incurred in good faith.

The Tribunal directed that the application continue to be processed, leaving the final determination on delay to be raised by the respondent.

Andrade v. The Home Depot, 2013 HRTO 243

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to limitation period notice.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Sinclair v. Presto Auto Glass Inc., 2013 HRTO 211

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to dismissal request.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to services on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that another proceeding had appropriately dealt with its substance.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Request to Dismiss, directing the applicant to respond.

The applicant failed to file a Reply or any submissions.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Grant Hutchinson v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 205

Human rights application partially dismissed for delay and lack of reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment by co-workers in 2009, discriminatory comments by a manager in 2010, and a false complaint leading to her removal from a work site.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to address timeliness and reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to 2009 as untimely, finding the delay was not incurred in good faith despite the applicant's claims of mental health issues.

The Tribunal also dismissed the allegations against several individual respondents and the union for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The application was allowed to proceed only against the employer and one manager regarding the 2010 discriminatory comments.

Sharma v. Securitas Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 176

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 29, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards Act claim regarding the same termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discriminatory termination of employment based on disability and family status.

Prior to filing the application, the applicant had filed an Employment Standards Act (ESA) claim with the Ministry of Labour regarding the same termination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the conclusion of the ESA claim.

Despite the applicant's objections regarding delays and economic stress, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application, finding that the ESA claim addressed the same facts and allegations and that the orderly administration of justice favoured deferral to the concurrent proceeding.

Nicole Irwin v. HMV Canada, 2013 HRTO 151

Chantal Tie

30 cases2001–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 29, 2013

Trustee in bankruptcy ordered to provide last known addresses of individual respondents from corporate records.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate respondent and three individual respondents.

The corporate respondent went into bankruptcy, triggering a stay of proceedings.

The applicant sought to proceed against the individual respondents and requested an order requiring the Trustee in bankruptcy to provide their last known addresses from corporate records.

The Tribunal granted the request, ordering the Trustee to confirm whether the application was delivered to the individuals and to provide their last known addresses.

Grandbois v. Belanger R.V. Inc., 2013 HRTO 158

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2013

Tribunal allows reprisal application to proceed, finding it not plain and obvious it lacks jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging reprisal by his employer and union regarding workplace accommodations following a harassment complaint.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) questioning its jurisdiction.

After reviewing the applicant's supplementary submissions detailing the alleged failure to accommodate and the union's alleged refusal to assist, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed that the application continue to be processed.

Rick Damphouse v. Canadian Union of Public Employees and The Corporation of the City of St. Thomas, 2013 HRTO 148

Frank A. Angeletti

10 cases1993–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, and age.

The respondent filed a Response denying the allegations and a Request for Orders During Proceedings seeking dismissal on various grounds, including untimeliness and a prior full and final release.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Request to Dismiss, directing the applicant to respond.

The applicant failed to file a Reply, respond to the Request for Orders, or make submissions regarding the Notice.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Ibrahim v. London (City), 2013 HRTO 136

Osborne Barnwell

23 cases2000–2016

George Parris

14 cases2006–2014

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2013

Pre-2009 discrimination allegations dismissed as untimely; pursuing internal grievances does not justify delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging race and disability discrimination, as well as reprisal, during her employment with the respondent Ministry.

The respondents challenged the timeliness of the application, as most allegations occurred more than a year before filing.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the untimely allegations formed a 'series of incidents' with the timely reprisal claim or if the delay was incurred in good faith.

The Tribunal found that allegations prior to May 2009 were discrete and separated by temporal gaps, and thus did not form a series of incidents.

Furthermore, the applicant's pursuit of internal grievances did not constitute a good faith reason for the delay.

The allegations prior to May 2009 were dismissed as untimely.

McPherson v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2013 HRTO 119

Kevin A. Egan

2 cases2011–2013

Frank A. Angeletti

10 cases1993–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2013

Deferred human rights application reactivated on consent following conclusion of related proceedings.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of other related proceedings.

The respondents consented to the reactivation, provided they were given reasonable time to file a response.

The Tribunal granted the request, reactivated the application, and directed the respondents to file their response within 35 days.

Alan Bernard v. London Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 116

Allen V. Craig

4 cases1980–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 22, 2013

Respondent's pre-response request for particulars denied as application contained sufficient detail to permit a response.

The respondent in a human rights application requested an order for particulars and an extension of time to file its Response, arguing the application lacked sufficient detail to establish a nexus to the alleged grounds of discrimination.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the application contained adequate detail regarding the alleged intimidation, differential treatment, and termination for the respondent to discern the allegations and file a Response.

The Tribunal reiterated its general rule that respondents must file a completed response prior to raising preliminary issues like requests for particulars, absent exceptional circumstances.

Jaffer v. Boehmer Box, 2013 HRTO 107

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2013

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide required documentation.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging the respondent breached a settlement agreement.

The respondent argued there was no formal settlement of a Tribunal application and that it had complied with a grievance settlement.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to confirm his intention to proceed and provide a copy of the written settlement.

The applicant failed to respond or provide the required documentation.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction.

Zurkowski v. Cargill Limited Canada, 2013 HRTO 95

Sharan K. Basran

8 cases2012–2023

Sari L. Springer

9 cases2009–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2013

Reconsideration granted in part to allow systemic discrimination allegations to proceed; direct discrimination claims remain dismissed.

The applicant, an international medical graduate, sought reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application alleging discrimination in the family medicine residency matching process.

The Tribunal denied reconsideration of the direct discrimination and age discrimination claims, finding no breach of procedural fairness or determinative new evidence.

However, the Tribunal granted reconsideration in part, allowing the application to proceed solely with respect to the applicant's proposed amendments alleging systemic discrimination, as the original decision had failed to address those specific allegations.

Minoo v. Ontario Family Medicine Residency Program, 2013 HRTO 99

Robert Baldwin

11 cases2008–2023

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related Highway Traffic Act court proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging racial profiling during a traffic stop and reprisal in the form of Highway Traffic Act charges.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed against the individual respondent for delay and that the matter be deferred pending the completion of the related court proceedings.

The Tribunal found that the application against the individual respondent was filed within the one-year time limit and denied the request to dismiss.

However, the Tribunal granted the request to defer the application, finding substantial overlap between the facts in the application and the ongoing court proceedings.

Joseph Briggs v. Toronto Police Services Board and Benjamin Wester, 2013 HRTO 46

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Human rights application against judicial actors dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to judicial immunity.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in services against several respondents, including judges of the Ontario Court of Justice.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding the judicial respondents, noting that the doctrine of judicial immunity prohibits legal proceedings against judicial actors based on their adjudicative duties.

The applicant failed to provide submissions on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the judicial respondents for lack of jurisdiction.

C.G. v. Timmins Police Services, 2013 HRTO 43

Hilary E. Jarvis

1 case2013–2013

Cathy Braker

12 cases2000–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the outcome of a concurrent grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondent employer and the union requested that the application be deferred because a grievance based on the same facts and issues was scheduled for arbitration.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance and arbitration processes to avoid concurrent proceedings.

Terrance Hadaway v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2013 HRTO 24

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 28, 2012

Human rights application reactivated following conclusion of related OLRB proceeding.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the outcome of an Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) proceeding.

The OLRB matter having concluded and the respondent not opposing, the Tribunal ordered the application reactivated and directed the respondent to advise whether it was amenable to mediation.

Desousa v. Steel-Craft Door Products Ltd., 2012 HRTO 2407

Kathryn J. Bird

23 cases2009–2026

Christopher J. Bittle

2 cases2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 21, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application for delay denied; resignation formed part of a series of incidents.

The corporate respondent requested that the human rights application alleging sexual harassment and disability discrimination be dismissed as untimely.

The respondent argued that the last incident occurred in February 2011 when it informed the applicant of the steps taken to address her concerns, making her March 2012 application out of time.

The applicant argued that her resignation in March 2011, prompted by the respondent's failure to accommodate her disability and protect her from a poisoned work environment, was the final incident.

The Tribunal found that the events culminating in the applicant's resignation constituted a series of incidents within the meaning of section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code, and therefore the application was timely.

Julie Cosby v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc. and Faron Hayden, 2012 HRTO 2389

Brian Gatien

2 cases2012–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 11, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of overlapping WSIB appeal regarding termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal with respect to employment because of disability, following his termination.

The applicant also had an ongoing appeal before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) regarding loss of earnings benefits related to the same termination.

The Tribunal deferred the human rights application pending the conclusion of the WSIB proceedings, finding a direct overlap in facts, issues, and potential remedies.

Michael Tranchemontagne v. C.J. Morris Investments Ltd. o/a Sudbury Hyundai, 2012 HRTO 2322

Page 8 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 8 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Zeleda Davis v. UNITE HERE Local 75, 2013 HRTO 283

Ena Chadha

Andrade v. The Home Depot, 2013 HRTO 243

Ena Chadha

Sinclair v. Presto Auto Glass Inc., 2013 HRTO 211

Ena Chadha

Grant Hutchinson v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 205

Shaheen Hirani

Lorenzo Lisi

Daniel R. McDonald

Ena Chadha

Sharma v. Securitas Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 176

Ena Chadha

Nicole Irwin v. HMV Canada, 2013 HRTO 151

Chantal Tie

Ena Chadha

Grandbois v. Belanger R.V. Inc., 2013 HRTO 158

Ena Chadha

Rick Damphouse v. Canadian Union of Public Employees and The Corporation of the City of St. Thomas, 2013 HRTO 148

Frank A. Angeletti

Ena Chadha

Ibrahim v. London (City), 2013 HRTO 136

Osborne Barnwell

George Parris

Ena Chadha

McPherson v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2013 HRTO 119

Kevin A. Egan

Frank A. Angeletti

Ena Chadha

Alan Bernard v. London Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 116

Allen V. Craig

Ena Chadha

Jaffer v. Boehmer Box, 2013 HRTO 107

Ena Chadha

Zurkowski v. Cargill Limited Canada, 2013 HRTO 95

Sharan K. Basran

Sari L. Springer

Ena Chadha

Minoo v. Ontario Family Medicine Residency Program, 2013 HRTO 99

Robert Baldwin

Ena Chadha

Joseph Briggs v. Toronto Police Services Board and Benjamin Wester, 2013 HRTO 46

Ena Chadha

C.G. v. Timmins Police Services, 2013 HRTO 43

Hilary E. Jarvis

Cathy Braker

Ena Chadha

Terrance Hadaway v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2013 HRTO 24

Ena Chadha

Desousa v. Steel-Craft Door Products Ltd., 2012 HRTO 2407

Kathryn J. Bird

Christopher J. Bittle

Ena Chadha

Julie Cosby v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc. and Faron Hayden, 2012 HRTO 2389

Brian Gatien

Ena Chadha

Michael Tranchemontagne v. C.J. Morris Investments Ltd. o/a Sudbury Hyundai, 2012 HRTO 2322

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons