Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 10, 2012

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as no specific breach was alleged.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement, alleging that more than one respondent should have paid him under a previous settlement agreement.

The respondent hospital maintained it had fulfilled all obligations and paid the settlement funds.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction because the applicant did not allege that a specific term of the settlement was breached, but rather expressed dissatisfaction with the terms he had previously agreed to.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Marc Grandmaison v. Sudbury Regional Hospital, 2012 HRTO 2321

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of record of offences.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed on several grounds, including an ongoing court proceeding, a signed release, and that the substance was dealt with in another proceeding.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file written submissions responding to the request to dismiss.

The applicant failed to respond or file submissions.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Dmitri Kirdeev v. City of Mississauga, 2012 HRTO 2287

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2012

Tribunal allows amendment to damages claim but removes individual managers as respondents.

The applicant filed human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary requests.

The Tribunal denied the applicant's request to add two corporate owners as individual respondents, finding no compelling reason to do so.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to amend the application to increase the damages claimed.

Finally, the Tribunal granted the respondents' request to remove two individual managers as respondents, as the corporate respondent accepted liability for their actions and there was no compelling reason to continue proceedings against them personally.

William Jeannotte v. 1094388 Ontario Limited o/a Pure Gold, 2012 HRTO 2300

Robert A. Centa

51 cases1993–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2012

Request for anonymity denied as applicant failed to show exceptional circumstances justifying departure from open hearings.

The applicant, a university student alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, requested an order for anonymity in the Tribunal process due to the sensitive nature of his medical information.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances or unique privacy concerns that would justify departing from the open hearing principle, as most disability cases involve some disclosure of personal medical information.

Alan Han v. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 2012 HRTO 2304

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 4, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to connect alleged unfairness to Code-protected grounds.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of citizenship and creed, claiming a court registrar obstructed his application for judicial review.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to fall outside its jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant felt he was treated unfairly, he failed to explain how the alleged mistreatment related to any Code-protected grounds.

The application was dismissed at a preliminary stage.

Whitney v. Superior Court of Justice, 2012 HRTO 2265

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 4, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage for failing to allege discrimination on a Code-protected ground.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of citizenship after the Ministry of the Attorney General advised him it lacked jurisdiction to register criminal charges against police officers.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

Finding that the applicant failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination related to a Code-protected ground, the Tribunal dismissed the application at a preliminary stage for lack of jurisdiction.

Lawrence Whitney v. Ministry of the Attorney General Communication Branch and Judy Phillips, 2012 HRTO 2271

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2012

Human rights application reactivated following Pay Equity Commission decision; hearing scheduled on s. 45.1 dismissal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding pay equity, which was deferred pending a Pay Equity Commission complaint.

After the Pay Equity Commission found no contravention and closed the complaint, the applicant requested reactivation.

The Tribunal reactivated the application, ordered the respondents to file a response, and scheduled a teleconference hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code on the basis that the Pay Equity Commission appropriately dealt with its substance.

Sacco v. John Howard Society of Peel Halton Dufferin, 2012 HRTO 2251

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 29, 2012

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application granted despite expiry of 60-day time limit.

The applicant filed a request to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a workplace grievance.

The grievance was withdrawn, but the applicant learned of the withdrawal outside the 60-day time limit for requesting reactivation.

Given the applicant's explanation for the delay and the lack of objection from the respondent and intervenor, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to lengthen the time limit and granted the request to reactivate the application.

Smit v. Diageo Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 2239

Omo Akintan

11 cases2008–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 28, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances regarding the same disability accommodation issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability, relating to attendance management and her subsequent dismissal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had four outstanding union grievances dealing with the same subject matter.

The respondents supported deferral, while the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance procedures to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of contradictory decisions.

Phoi Thi Pauline Watt v. Corporation of the City of Toronto-Children’s Services, 2012 HRTO 2214

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 26, 2012

Human rights application against Ontario Review Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to judicial immunity.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination regarding his transfer ordered by the Ontario Review Board.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, noting it lacks jurisdiction over courts and tribunals based on the execution of adjudicative duties due to judicial immunity.

The applicant failed to file submissions.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the Ontario Review Board, confirming that adjudicative outcomes do not constitute 'services' under the Human Rights Code.

Conway v. St. Joseph’s Health Care Hamilton, 2012 HRTO 2208

Respondents permitted to disclose applicant's health records to potential witnesses to prepare human rights response.

The respondents in a human rights application sought an order permitting them to access, use, and disclose the applicant's personal health information contained in the employer's Occupational Health and Claims Management files to potential witnesses in order to prepare their Response.

The applicant consented to disclosure to the respondents and their counsel but objected to disclosure to potential witnesses.

The Tribunal held that under the Personal Health Information Protection Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Act, disclosure to potential witnesses is permissible for the purpose of participating in a proceeding.

The Tribunal granted the request subject to strict confidentiality requirements, granted a 35-day extension to file the Response, and ordered the respondents to provide the applicant with copies of the disclosed documents, subject to redactions for privilege.

Dewdney v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2012 HRTO 2212

Mireille Khoraych

14 cases2010–2016

Dave Steele

11 cases2012–2014

Amanda Hunter

17 cases1998–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 20, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for being filed beyond the one-year limitation period without good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination in employment 16 months after his termination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for being filed beyond the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the delay was due to depression and the time it took to complete the application.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to provide medical evidence demonstrating that his disability prevented him from pursuing his rights within the timeline, noting he was actively pursuing a grievance during that period.

The application was dismissed for failing to establish the delay was incurred in good faith.

Todd v. Rouge Valley Health System, 2012 HRTO 2173

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 20, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After cancelling her attendance at a scheduled mediation due to a family emergency, the applicant failed to respond to subsequent Tribunal correspondence and a Case Assessment Direction requiring her to confirm her intentions to proceed.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Gitangeli Goberdhan v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc., 2012 HRTO 2172

Michelle A. Alton

9 cases2012–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 16, 2012

Request for interim remedy of reinstatement dismissed; application remains in abeyance.

The applicant filed requests for orders during proceedings and an interim remedy seeking reinstatement to his employment, alleging ongoing discrimination and reprisal.

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not meet the significant onus to demonstrate that the balance of harm or convenience favoured granting the interim remedy or that it was just and appropriate.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for an interim remedy and confirmed that the application would continue to be held in abeyance pending the release of a decision in the applicant's first application.

Tarek Ibrahim v. Hilton Toronto, 2012 HRTO 2160

Karen Sargeant

13 cases1999–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 15, 2012

Extension of time granted to reactivate deferred human rights application despite missed deadline.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application after her union withdrew her grievances.

The respondent objected because the request was filed approximately two weeks after the 60-day deadline under Rule 14.4.

The Tribunal granted an extension of time, noting the applicant was self-represented, had limited English proficiency, the delay was short, and the respondent suffered no specific prejudice.

Zoila Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2012 HRTO 2156

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 15, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for being filed outside the one-year limitation period without good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment almost two years after her dismissal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year time limit under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the delay was justified because she was actively pursuing her concerns with other organizations and experiencing ongoing hardship.

The Tribunal found that pursuing rights elsewhere and continuing effects of termination do not extend the time limit or constitute good faith delay.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Finlay v. Bruce-Grey Catholic District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2152

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 6, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of overlapping Employment Standards claim regarding pregnancy reprisal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to employment on the ground of sex (pregnancy).

She also filed an Employment Standards claim regarding pregnancy-related reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the conclusion of the Employment Standards process.

Neither party filed submissions.

Finding significant overlap between the two proceedings, the Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Gonzalez v. IBM Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 2105

Gavin Leeb

23 cases1996–2018

Colin Youngman

12 cases2010–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance process.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability, relating to workplace discipline and suspension.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, and the respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of a concurrent grievance regarding the same events.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status and deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process, noting that both parties agreed to the deferral.

Neal v. Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2087

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file required jurisdictional submissions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to file written submissions regarding jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to file the required submissions by the specified deadlines.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Claudia Brkic v. Longo Brothers Fruit Markets Inc. and Kirk Holmes, 2012 HRTO 2072

Donna Polgar

4 cases2012–2014

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2012

Respondent permitted to amend Response narrative after retaining counsel; credibility issues deferred to hearing.

The respondent in a human rights application requested an order to amend its Response to include a new narrative and correct its legal name, having recently retained counsel.

The applicant opposed the amendment, arguing the new information was false.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting the early stage of the proceedings, the lack of prejudice to the applicant, and that credibility issues could be addressed at the hearing.

Lachance v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 2091

Page 9 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 9 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Marc Grandmaison v. Sudbury Regional Hospital, 2012 HRTO 2321

Ena Chadha

Dmitri Kirdeev v. City of Mississauga, 2012 HRTO 2287

Ena Chadha

William Jeannotte v. 1094388 Ontario Limited o/a Pure Gold, 2012 HRTO 2300

Robert A. Centa

Ena Chadha

Alan Han v. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 2012 HRTO 2304

Ena Chadha

Whitney v. Superior Court of Justice, 2012 HRTO 2265

Ena Chadha

Lawrence Whitney v. Ministry of the Attorney General Communication Branch and Judy Phillips, 2012 HRTO 2271

Ena Chadha

Sacco v. John Howard Society of Peel Halton Dufferin, 2012 HRTO 2251

Ena Chadha

Smit v. Diageo Canada Inc., 2012 HRTO 2239

Omo Akintan

Ena Chadha

Phoi Thi Pauline Watt v. Corporation of the City of Toronto-Children’s Services, 2012 HRTO 2214

Ena Chadha

Conway v. St. Joseph’s Health Care Hamilton, 2012 HRTO 2208

Lucy Siraco

Farah Malik

Ena Chadha

Dewdney v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2012 HRTO 2212

Mireille Khoraych

Dave Steele

Amanda Hunter

Ena Chadha

Todd v. Rouge Valley Health System, 2012 HRTO 2173

Ena Chadha

Gitangeli Goberdhan v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc., 2012 HRTO 2172

Michelle A. Alton

Ena Chadha

Tarek Ibrahim v. Hilton Toronto, 2012 HRTO 2160

Karen Sargeant

Ena Chadha

Zoila Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2012 HRTO 2156

Ena Chadha

Finlay v. Bruce-Grey Catholic District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2152

Ena Chadha

Gonzalez v. IBM Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 2105

Gavin Leeb

Colin Youngman

Ena Chadha

Neal v. Kawartha Pine Ridge District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2087

Ena Chadha

Claudia Brkic v. Longo Brothers Fruit Markets Inc. and Kirk Holmes, 2012 HRTO 2072

Donna Polgar

Ena Chadha

Lachance v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited, 2012 HRTO 2091

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai