Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Tracey L. Epp

1 case2013–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 18, 2013

Request to amend application granted for damages claim but denied for adding personal respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend the application to increase the damages claim and add his former manager as a personal respondent.

The Tribunal allowed the amendment to the damages claim, finding no prejudice to the respondent.

However, the Tribunal denied the request to add the former manager as a personal respondent, as there was no compelling juridical reason to do so and the corporate respondent could be held vicariously liable for the manager's actions.

Liu v. Everlink Payment Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 639

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 18, 2013

Tribunal declines to dismiss human rights application for delay at preliminary stage.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant submitted that the date on the application was an error and referred to a workplace injury, not the last discriminatory event.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was out of time and directed that the application continue to be processed.

Abrego v. St. Joseph’s Health Care, Parkwood Site, 2013 HRTO 654

Gary V. Melanson

2 cases2013–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 18, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related OIPRD investigation into police conduct.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by police officers who allegedly took his eagle feather during a search of his residence.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of related criminal proceedings and public complaints with the Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD).

The Tribunal declined to defer based on the criminal proceedings but ordered the application deferred pending the completion of the OIPRD process, as the OIPRD complaints involved the exact same events and an investigation was actively underway.

Preddie v. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 637

Reprisal application allowed to proceed as applicant identified potential evidence to support her claims.

The applicant alleged that the respondent reprised against her for filing a previous sexual harassment application against the respondent's husband.

The respondent allegedly made loud and aggressive remarks about the applicant's sexual history at a public event.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Finding that the applicant had referenced potentially relevant testimony to substantiate her claims, the Tribunal concluded the application must proceed to a full hearing on its merits.

Zavarella v. Antonucci, 2013 HRTO 647

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2013

Human rights applications dismissed as abandoned after applicants failed to comply with Tribunal order.

The applicants filed human rights applications which were deferred pending the completion of related grievance proceedings.

After the grievances were settled, the Tribunal ordered the applicants to either formally withdraw their applications or request reactivation.

The applicants failed to comply with the order and indicated they considered the matter resolved.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the applications abandoned and dismissed them.

Howarth v. Niagara Emergency Medical Services/Regional Municipality of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 632

Jenny Stephenson

4 cases2002–2013

Christopher A. Sinal

2 cases2013–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2013

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as parallel professional discipline proceedings remained ongoing.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a disciplinary process by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

The respondents opposed the reactivation, arguing it was premature because the penalty phase of the College process was still outstanding.

The Tribunal agreed with the respondents, finding that the College process was not yet complete and denying the request to reactivate the application.

Genna Mandich v. Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd., 2013 HRTO 598

Donna Polgar

4 cases2012–2014

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2013

Respondent permitted to amend Response to correct inadvertent narrative errors prior to disclosure.

The respondent in a human rights application brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend its Response to correct inadvertent errors in two paragraphs of its narrative.

The self-represented applicant opposed the request, arguing it was an attempt to hide the truth.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the hearing was months away, disclosure had not yet been exchanged, and the amendments were limited in scope.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to address the proper identity of the respondent, as the restaurant in question was a franchise.

Neallos Wedemire v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 613

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 11, 2013

Human rights application dismissed at preliminary stage as employment dispute did not engage Code-protected grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging reprisal and constructive dismissal after being hired as a superintendent but assigned cleaning duties.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not identify any specific acts of discrimination or explain how the alleged reprisal related to claiming or enforcing a right under the Human Rights Code.

Finding that the Tribunal does not have a general power to inquire into claims of unfairness outside of the grounds listed in the Code, the adjudicator dismissed the application at the preliminary stage for lack of jurisdiction.

Virancis Rulona v. City Housing Hamilton / First Place, City of Hamilton, Ramana Ganersaratnam, Mario DeMedeiros and Al Morrison, 2013 HRTO 603

Daryn M. Jeffries

In Private Practice10 cases1996–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2013

Tribunal refuses to hold applications in abeyance after related grievances settled; applicants directed to withdraw or reactivate.

The applicants requested that their human rights applications, which had been deferred pending grievance proceedings, be held in abeyance following the settlement of those grievances.

The respondents argued the applications should be dismissed or withdrawn pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement.

The Tribunal declined to hold the matters in abeyance, noting that deferral is intended to avoid concurrent proceedings and the grievance process had concluded.

The Tribunal directed the applicants to either file a request to withdraw the applications or a request to reactivate them within 7 days, failing which the applications may be deemed abandoned.

Howarth v. Niagara Emergency Medical Services/Regional Municipality of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 523

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2013

Tribunal declines to dismiss age discrimination application for delay at preliminary stage.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination regarding his pension benefits following a change in his union in 2004.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay, as the application was filed in 2012.

The applicant submitted that he was scheduled to retire in February 2013 and had not yet received his pension statement.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was out of time, as the exact date the alleged discrimination was experienced remained unclear.

The Tribunal directed that the application continue to be processed and delivered to the respondent.

Marvin Lagace v. Coca Cola, 2013 HRTO 516

Susan Luft

3 cases2003–2013

Roger R. Mills

4 cases2003–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2013

Tribunal directs respondent to file complete Response before considering request to defer application pending grievance.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically the failure to accommodate her need for a modified schedule.

The respondent and the applicant's union requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of an ongoing workplace grievance.

The Tribunal declined to consider the deferral request at this stage, directing the respondent to file a complete Response within 21 days before any preliminary matters are addressed.

Janette Blais v. Ottawa Carlton District School Board, 2013 HRTO 501

John R. Evans

15 cases1995–2013

Bruce E. Rosenberg

1 case2013–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 18, 2013

Motion to dismiss human rights application denied; concurrent wrongful dismissal action did not seek Code remedies.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be dismissed or deferred under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the applicant had commenced a concurrent civil action for wrongful dismissal arising from the same facts.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the civil action did not allege human rights violations or seek Code-related remedies.

The Tribunal also declined to defer the application, noting that the human rights application was filed well before the civil action and the civil action was currently inactive.

Scott v. Guyana Goldfields Inc., 2013 HRTO 458

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2013

Reconsideration of human rights application dismissal denied as no new determinative evidence was provided.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application against the police for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant argued there were new facts and that she did not receive proper notice regarding the evidence required.

The Tribunal denied the reconsideration request, finding that the applicant merely reiterated previous arguments, failed to provide new determinative evidence, and that her lack of knowledge regarding evidentiary requirements did not constitute a lack of notice under the Rules of Procedure.

Maria Rots v. Toronto City Police 11 Division, 2013 HRTO 339

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to provide contact information.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on ancestry.

The Tribunal made several attempts to communicate with the applicant to confirm his contact information, including issuing Case Assessment Directions.

The applicant failed to comply with the directions to provide his mailing address and other contact details.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Zurbrigg v. Yogurtworld Limited, 2013 HRTO 331

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2013

Tribunal declines to dismiss human rights application at preliminary stage, finding jurisdiction not plainly lacking.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services, goods, and facilities based on race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, ethnic origin, and disability.

The Tribunal initially issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to lack specific acts of discrimination.

The applicant subsequently provided written submissions clarifying her belief that she and her guests were denied entry to a theatre function and ejected from the premises because of their colour and minority background.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the alleged acts fell outside its jurisdiction and directed that the application continue to be processed.

Sandra Baksh v. The St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts, Beauties of Canada and Denis Davila, 2013 HRTO 338

Mark A. Stone

12 cases2000–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2013

Application reactivated after WSIB proceedings concluded; extension of time granted due to lack of prejudice.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and reprisal, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of WSIB proceedings.

The respondents opposed the reactivation due to the applicant's delay in filing the request.

The Tribunal granted an extension of time, noting the lack of prejudice to the respondents and the conclusion of the WSIB process, and ordered the application reactivated.

Pillon v. Turtle Island Recycling Corp., 2013 HRTO 334

Lisa Washington-Watts

2 cases2012–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 26, 2013

Two human rights applications alleging workplace discrimination by the same employer and co-workers consolidated.

Two applicants filed separate human rights applications alleging racial discrimination and reprisal by the same co-workers and employer.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction to determine whether the applications should be consolidated.

Applying the factors from Lattey, the Tribunal found that the applications shared common issues of fact and law, and that consolidation would avoid a multiplicity of proceedings without causing significant prejudice.

The applications were ordered consolidated.

Vilner v. Zale Canada Co., 2013 HRTO 324

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2013

Tribunal declined to dismiss human rights application for delay at preliminary stage.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the respondent police service, claiming he was beaten and wrongfully charged with assault.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant submitted that he attempted to file within the timeline and requested deferral pending his criminal trial.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that an argument under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code would be unsuccessful, and directed that the application continue to be processed.

Gawain Coley v. Toronto Police Service, 2013 HRTO 301

Jorge V. Hurtado

1 case2013–2013

James G. Knight

12 cases1986–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 21, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance process regarding disability accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and failure to accommodate his disability by his employer.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the conclusion of an ongoing grievance process under the collective agreement dealing with the same issues.

The Tribunal granted the request and deferred the application, noting that the grievance process was active and overlapping with the human rights allegations, in order to avoid concurrent proceedings.

Majhi v. Fairmont Royal York Hotel, 2013 HRTO 292

Karen Sargeant

13 cases1999–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2013

Motion to dismiss denied; union's unilateral withdrawal of grievance does not bar human rights application.

The respondent requested the dismissal of a human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the applicant's union's unilateral withdrawal of her grievances constituted a final determination of the issues.

The Tribunal found that the withdrawal of a grievance without a formal resolution or settlement does not constitute a proceeding that appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal also rejected the respondent's argument that continuing the application was an abuse of process, noting the applicant did not consent to the withdrawal.

The request to dismiss was denied.

Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2013 HRTO 270

Page 7 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 7 of 44 (867 cases)

Tracey L. Epp

Ena Chadha

Liu v. Everlink Payment Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 639

Ena Chadha

Abrego v. St. Joseph’s Health Care, Parkwood Site, 2013 HRTO 654

Gary V. Melanson

Ena Chadha

Preddie v. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 637

Wade Poziomka

Helen Pelton

Ena Chadha

Zavarella v. Antonucci, 2013 HRTO 647

Ena Chadha

Howarth v. Niagara Emergency Medical Services/Regional Municipality of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 632

Jenny Stephenson

Christopher A. Sinal

Ena Chadha

Genna Mandich v. Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd., 2013 HRTO 598

Donna Polgar

Ena Chadha

Neallos Wedemire v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 613

Ena Chadha

Virancis Rulona v. City Housing Hamilton / First Place, City of Hamilton, Ramana Ganersaratnam, Mario DeMedeiros and Al Morrison, 2013 HRTO 603

Daryn M. Jeffries

Ena Chadha

Howarth v. Niagara Emergency Medical Services/Regional Municipality of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 523

Ena Chadha

Marvin Lagace v. Coca Cola, 2013 HRTO 516

Susan Luft

Roger R. Mills

Ena Chadha

Janette Blais v. Ottawa Carlton District School Board, 2013 HRTO 501

John R. Evans

Bruce E. Rosenberg

Ena Chadha

Scott v. Guyana Goldfields Inc., 2013 HRTO 458

Ena Chadha

Maria Rots v. Toronto City Police 11 Division, 2013 HRTO 339

Ena Chadha

Zurbrigg v. Yogurtworld Limited, 2013 HRTO 331

Ena Chadha

Sandra Baksh v. The St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts, Beauties of Canada and Denis Davila, 2013 HRTO 338

Mark A. Stone

Ena Chadha

Pillon v. Turtle Island Recycling Corp., 2013 HRTO 334

Lisa Washington-Watts

Ena Chadha

Vilner v. Zale Canada Co., 2013 HRTO 324

Ena Chadha

Gawain Coley v. Toronto Police Service, 2013 HRTO 301

Jorge V. Hurtado

James G. Knight

Ena Chadha

Majhi v. Fairmont Royal York Hotel, 2013 HRTO 292

Karen Sargeant

Ena Chadha

Davila v. McKesson Canada, 2013 HRTO 270

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons