Who is Carmine Tucci?

Carmine Tucci is a member at the Ontario Land Tribunal with 192 decisions on record from 2021 to 2026. Key areas include other tribunals, administrative law, real estate law.

What tribunal does Carmine Tucci sit on?

Carmine Tucci sits on the Ontario Land Tribunal.

What areas of law does Carmine Tucci decide?

Carmine Tucci's most common areas include Other Tribunals (187 decisions), Administrative Law (102 decisions), Real Estate Law (55 decisions). Carmine Tucci has handled 192 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Carmine Tucci made?

Carmine Tucci has 192 decisions on record from 2021 to 2026.

Who frequently appears before Carmine Tucci?

Representatives who frequently appear before Carmine Tucci include Daniel Elmadany, Jason Davidson, Leo Longo.

Carmine Tucci — Member

OBD Developments Inc., OBM Marina Inc., and OBG Golf Inc. v. Georgian Bay (Township), 2026 CanLII 55969

Appeal allowed in part to implement a settlement amending a municipal housekeeping zoning by-law.

The appellants appealed the Township of Georgian Bay's Amending By-law No. 2025-053 (a housekeeping by-law) under subsection 34(19) of the Planning Act.

The parties reached a full uncontested settlement.

Based on the uncontradicted planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the revised by-law contains only clarificatory and editorial amendments, is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, conforms to the applicable Official Plans, and represents good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part to amend the by-law in accordance with the settlement.

OLTJun 3, 2026

Wigwoss Investments Inc. & 2561658 Ontario Inc. v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 52480

Tribunal issues final order approving official plan and zoning amendments for a 10-storey residential development.

The Tribunal issued a final order approving an official plan amendment and a zoning by-law amendment for the City of Vaughan, permitting a 10-storey residential building with 103 units.

The order follows a previous interim decision that withheld final approval until certain pre-requisite conditions were satisfied.

The amendments facilitate residential intensification within a major transit station area, consistent with provincial and regional planning policies.

OLTMay 27, 2026

8111 Kennedy Markham Inc. v. Markham (City), 2026 CanLII 46870

Participant status granted and hearing dates scheduled in appeals for failure to make planning decisions.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by 8111 Kennedy Markham Inc. for the City of Markham's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and draft Plan of Subdivision.

The Tribunal granted participant status to four community associations on consent.

A Telephone Conference Call and a 10-day merit hearing were scheduled.

OLTMay 11, 2026

Gabriele Homes Ltd. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 46862

Tribunal amends previous decision to correct a typographical error regarding a slope stability acronym.

The Ontario Land Tribunal issued an amending decision to correct a typographical error in its previous decision dated May 4, 2026.

Pursuant to Rule 24.4 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice and Procedure, the Tribunal corrected the definition of the acronym 'LTSSC' from 'Lake Toe of Slope Stability Crest' to 'Long Term Stable Slope Crest'.

In all other respects, the original decision remains unchanged.

OLTMay 11, 2026

Di Fiore v. Burlington (City), 2026 CanLII 44802

Appeal allowed and minor variance for driveway widening authorized based on settlement between parties.

The appellant appealed a Committee of Adjustment decision denying a minor variance to legalize an over-widened driveway.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement to authorize the variance subject to conditions preventing further widening and requiring a curb cutting application.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the variance met the statutory tests under the Planning Act and allowed the appeal.

OLTMay 5, 2026

Gabriele Homes Ltd. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 44813

Settlement for 13-storey mixed-use development approved in principle; final order withheld pending conditions.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a mixed-use development.

The parties reached a settlement for a 13-storey building with enhanced setbacks, environmental protection for the adjacent ravine, and public realm improvements.

Relying on uncontradicted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal represents good planning, is consistent with provincial policy, and is in the public interest.

The appeals were allowed in part on an interim basis, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of various conditions.

OLTMay 4, 2026

Caledon (Town) v. Petrella, 2026 CanLII 38549

Merit hearing converted to case management conference and adjourned to allow parties to consider proposed settlement.

The appellant municipality appealed a decision of the Committee of Adjustment approving a minor variance to permit the existing use of lands for heavy vehicle operations in an agricultural zone.

At the onset of the hearing, the Tribunal was informed that the municipality had proposed a settlement to the applicant.

On consent, the scheduled merit hearing was converted to a case management conference, and a further hearing date was scheduled to allow the parties to present a settlement or proceed to a hearing on the merits.

OLTApr 24, 2026

Eden Oak (Bayfield) Inc. v. Halton Hills (Town), 2026 CanLII 38545

Tribunal schedules 13-day hearing for appeals regarding failure to decide on planning applications.

The applicant appealed the Town of Halton Hills' failure to make a decision on applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and a proposed Plan of Subdivision to permit townhouse and single-detached dwellings.

At the second Case Management Conference, the Tribunal noted the parties had engaged in mediation and scheduled a 13-day hearing to commence on October 20, 2026.

The Tribunal also ordered the submission of an updated Procedural Order and Issues List.

OLTApr 23, 2026

Westlake Canada Inc. o/a Westlake Pipes & Fitting v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 35701

Settlement approving Official Plan Amendment for mixed-use development with industrial compatibility mitigation measures allowed.

The appellant appealed the City of Vaughan's adoption of Official Plan Amendment 139, raising concerns about land use compatibility with its existing industrial operations.

The parties reached a settlement that included updated policy language requiring land use compatibility studies, noise mitigation measures, and holding provisions until noise reports confirm appropriate designations.

Based on uncontradicted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the modified OPA consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2024 and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed to approve the settlement.

OLTApr 16, 2026

Nortterra Meaford II Inc. v. Meaford (Municipality), 2026 CanLII 25171

Minor variance for front-yard parking to accommodate additional residential units authorized on appeal.

The appellant appealed the municipal Committee of Adjustment's refusal of a minor variance to allow front-yard parking for single-detached homes designed to accommodate two Additional Residential Units (ARUs).

The municipality did not attend the hearing but its planning staff report supported the variance.

The Tribunal found that the variance met the four tests under the Planning Act, noting that it aligned with provincial housing objectives and corrected an inadvertent omission in the updated zoning by-law.

The appeal was allowed and the variance authorized.

OLTMar 20, 2026

Wigwoss Investments Inc. & 2561658 Ontario Inc. v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 25178

Appeals for 10-storey residential development allowed in part; proposal represents appropriate transit-supportive intensification.

The appellants appealed the City of Vaughan's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 10-storey residential apartment building.

The City argued the proposal represented overdevelopment and lacked appropriate transition.

The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the appellants' experts, finding the proposal represented appropriate intensification within a Protected Major Transit Station Area, provided a suitable transition to the adjacent low-rise neighbourhood, and conformed to the applicable provincial and municipal planning frameworks.

The appeals were allowed in part on an interim basis, pending finalization of the instruments and a holding provision for servicing capacity.

OLTMar 19, 2026

Gingrich v. Mapleton (Township), 2026 CanLII 20150

Appeal allowed and minor variance for reduced setbacks to permit a hobby barn authorized.

The appellant appealed the Township of Mapleton Committee of Adjustment's refusal of a minor variance to permit the construction of a hobby barn.

Prior to the hearing, the parties agreed to relocate the structure and reduce its footprint, requiring relief only for rear and side yard setbacks.

The Tribunal found that the revised variance met the four tests under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act, noting the Township's support and the lack of adverse impacts.

The appeal was allowed and the variance authorized.

OLTMar 3, 2026

Dunpar Homes et al. v. Mississauga (City), 2026 CanLII 16831

Tribunal approves settlement amending Mississauga's parkland conveyance by-law to conform with Bill 23 legislative changes.

Several developers and industry associations appealed the City of Mississauga's Parkland Conveyance By-law under section 42(4.9) of the Planning Act.

Following the enactment of Bill 23, which amended parkland dedication and cash-in-lieu requirements, the parties reached a settlement to revise the by-law to conform to the new legislative provisions.

Relying on uncontradicted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised by-law consistent with provincial policy, in conformity with the official plan, and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part to amend the by-law in accordance with the settlement.

OLTFeb 25, 2026

European Bakery Supply Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 16843

Tribunal approves settlement for a two-tower mixed-use development, allowing appeals in part on an interim basis.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for a proposed two-tower mixed-use development.

The parties reached a settlement proposing 29- and 39-storey towers connected by a shared podium, including residential units, retail space, and an on-site parkland dedication.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with provincial and municipal policies, representing good planning and the public interest.

The appeals were allowed in part on an interim basis, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of several conditions.

OLTFeb 25, 2026

1679 Grasmere Holdings Inc. v. Ottawa (City), 2026 CanLII 16283

Consent and minor variances for semi-detached dwellings approved as appropriate residential intensification.

The applicant appealed the City of Ottawa Committee of Adjustment's refusal of consent and minor variance applications to sever a property and construct two semi-detached dwellings.

The City did not attend the hearing but provided a planning report supporting the applications subject to conditions.

The Tribunal heard expert planning evidence that the proposal represents appropriate low-rise intensification, is compatible with the neighbourhood, and meets the four tests under the Planning Act.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals and authorized the consent and variances subject to the City's recommended conditions.

OLTFeb 20, 2026

Municipality of Grey Highlands v. Devin Kloosterboer & Shawn Delaat, 2026 CanLII 16298

Appeal dismissed; minor variance for reduced side yard setback on undersized agricultural lot authorized.

The Municipality of Grey Highlands appealed a Committee of Adjustment decision granting a minor variance to reduce the interior side yard setback from 15 m to 6 m for a single detached dwelling on an undersized lot in an agricultural zone.

The Tribunal heard competing expert planning evidence regarding whether the variance met the four tests under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act and was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The Tribunal accepted the evidence of the applicants' planners, finding that the Zoning By-law explicitly contemplates the proposed residential use on undersized lots.

The appeal was dismissed and the variance was authorized subject to conditions.

OLTFeb 17, 2026

Friday Harbour Resort Holdings Inc. v. Innisfil (Town), 2026 CanLII 12536

Tribunal issues procedural order and grants party status for Friday Harbour Resort development appeals.

OLTFeb 12, 2026

Ferrovia Investments Inc. v. Guelph (City), 2026 CanLII 9712

Tribunal schedules second Case Management Conference for remaining appeals of Guelph's Comprehensive Zoning By-law.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding multiple appeals of the City of Guelph's new Comprehensive Zoning By-law and related Official Plan Amendment No. 88.

The Tribunal received status updates indicating that several site-specific appeals had been resolved, while constructive discussions continued on the remaining city-wide and site-specific appeals.

On consent of the parties, the Tribunal scheduled a second multi-day Case Management Conference for March 2026 to further organize the proceedings and establish a Procedural Order for any unresolved issues.

OLTFeb 5, 2026

Lake Shore West Co-Ownership v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 9715

Tribunal issues procedural order and schedules 5-day merit hearing for official plan and zoning appeals.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision regarding applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for a proposed 39-storey mixed-use building.

At a second Case Management Conference, the Tribunal was advised that the City would not call witnesses and requested a reduction in hearing days.

The Tribunal issued a Procedural Order and scheduled a 5-day merit hearing to commence on May 25, 2026.

OLTFeb 4, 2026

Norfolk Development Inc. v. Richmond Hill (City), 2026 CanLII 9727

Tribunal issues procedural order and schedules 10-day hearing for 15-story development appeals.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding appeals by Norfolk Development Inc. against the City of Richmond Hill's failure to make decisions on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.

The applications seek to facilitate a 15-story development containing 344 units.

The Tribunal issued a Procedural Order and scheduled a 10-day video hearing to commence on July 13, 2026.

OLTFeb 3, 2026

OBD Developments Inc., OBM Marina Inc., and OBG Golf Inc. v. Georgian Bay (Township), 2026 CanLII 55969

Wigwoss Investments Inc. & 2561658 Ontario Inc. v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 52480

8111 Kennedy Markham Inc. v. Markham (City), 2026 CanLII 46870

Gabriele Homes Ltd. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 46862

Di Fiore v. Burlington (City), 2026 CanLII 44802

Gabriele Homes Ltd. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 44813

Caledon (Town) v. Petrella, 2026 CanLII 38549

Eden Oak (Bayfield) Inc. v. Halton Hills (Town), 2026 CanLII 38545

Westlake Canada Inc. o/a Westlake Pipes & Fitting v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 35701

Nortterra Meaford II Inc. v. Meaford (Municipality), 2026 CanLII 25171

Wigwoss Investments Inc. & 2561658 Ontario Inc. v. Vaughan (City), 2026 CanLII 25178

Gingrich v. Mapleton (Township), 2026 CanLII 20150

Dunpar Homes et al. v. Mississauga (City), 2026 CanLII 16831

European Bakery Supply Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 16843

1679 Grasmere Holdings Inc. v. Ottawa (City), 2026 CanLII 16283

Municipality of Grey Highlands v. Devin Kloosterboer & Shawn Delaat, 2026 CanLII 16298

Friday Harbour Resort Holdings Inc. v. Innisfil (Town), 2026 CanLII 12536

Ferrovia Investments Inc. v. Guelph (City), 2026 CanLII 9712

Lake Shore West Co-Ownership v. Toronto (City), 2026 CanLII 9715

Norfolk Development Inc. v. Richmond Hill (City), 2026 CanLII 9727

for 1000239297 Ontario Inc

for 100 Davenport GP Inc. c/o 100 Davenport Limited Partnership

for 11087258 Canada Inc.

for 111 Strachan Development LP Inc.

for 111 Strachan Developments LP Inc.

for 1136974 Ontario Inc. (“Dunpar Homes”)

for 1173044 Ontario Holding

for 1290337 Ontario Inc. and 10 Keith Avenue Inc.

for 1404649 Ontario Ltd. and Glen Williams Estates Inc.

for 1407 Lakeshore Development Inc.

for 1500 Bayview Avenue Limited and BHL Properties Limited

for 1501786 Ontario Limited

for 1583123 Ontario Inc.

for 1621185 Ontario Inc.

for 174 Spadina Avenue Holding Corp.

for 191 Niagara St. Inc.

for 1984396 Ontario Inc.

for 2014707 Ontario Inc.

for 2247322 Ontario Inc.

for 2274581 Ontario Inc.

for 24051124 Ontario Ltd.

for 245 Oakland Con 1 Inc.

for 2496582 Ontario Inc. (Movengo)

for 2515496 Ontario Inc.

for 2519371 Ontario Inc.

for 2589618 Ontario Inc. and 2613598 Ontario Inc.

for 2649408 Ontario Limited

for 2738766 Ontario Limited, 2738777 Ontario Limited, and 848866 Ontario Limited

for 2742707 Ontario Limited

for 2793031 Ontario Inc.

for 2828778 Ontario Inc.

for 2970 Lakeshore GP Inc.

for 4926 Bathurst Inc.

for 4949 Bathurst LP

for 4Q Commercial WP Inc.

for 5047178 Ontario Inc.

for 5047178 Ontario Inc. and Rosart Bucci Group

for 5336 IND Properties Inc.

for 5336 IND PROPERTIES INC

for 538 St. Clair Avenue Ltd.

for 6200 Yonge GP Inc.

for 6 Dawes Danforth Inc., 9 Dawes Development Inc., 25 Dawes Inc., Minto (Dawes) GP Inc., Dandaw Development Limited, Marlin Springs Limited Partnership, Tri-Metro Investments Inc., Metrolinx, Victoria Wood (Main Square) Inc.

for 761 Queen Street East Ltd.

for 772 Winston Churchill Limited Partnership

for 8104476 Canada Inc.

for 8111 Kennedy Markham Inc.

for 919819 Ontario Ltd. and 1891445 Ontario Inc.

for 950 King Street West Holdings Inc.

for A1 Developments Inc.

for ABC Residents Association / Greater Yorkville Residents Association / Belmont House

for Air Liquide Canada Inc.

for Ana Goncalves et al.

for Antonio and Iwona D Tullio and Paul and Ingrid Vincent

for Argo TFP Brampton III Limited

for Argo TFP Brampton IV Limited

for Ari Dianat

for Artlife Developments

for Atlantic Packaging Holdings Ltd and Atlantic Packing Products Ltd.

for Avenue 7 Developments Ltd.

for AVM Developments Inc.