The moving party sought leave to appeal several decisions of the Ontario Land Tribunal regarding a secondary plan and zoning bylaw, alleging breaches of procedural fairness.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding that the proposed grounds did not raise questions of law of general or public importance.
The court noted that the Tribunal's procedural decisions, including limiting cross-examination and quashing summonses, fell within its statutory discretion to control its own process and did not demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of bias.
