minicounsel

Dr. McMaster

psychiatrist

Since 2005

cases · 22 yrs · OCA, SCJ, OCJ, ORB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

21 total

Appeal from Ontario Review Board dismissed; finding of significant threat to public safety upheld.

The appellant appealed a disposition by the Ontario Review Board.

The Court of Appeal held that the Board's determination that the appellant posed a significant threat to public safety was not unreasonable, relying on the hospital's report and expert testimony.

The Court found the disposition, which allowed the appellant to reside in approved community housing, to be the least onerous and least restrictive option available.

The appeal was dismissed.

R. v. Sturkenboom, 2005 CanLII 4268 (ON CA)

risk of future threat

Lawyers who appeared with Dr. McMaster

Barry G. Marta

Jordan Bryan Goldblatt

Wayne Arthur Cunningham

Liana Marcon

Ryan Handlarski

George Gray

Danielle Marie Garbaty

Judges who heard Dr. McMaster's testimony

Richard H.K. Schwarzl

total cases

22 yrs

active span

courts

0.1

cases/mo

OCA10(48%)

SCJ6(29%)

OCJ3(14%)

ORB2(10%)

Retained by

Unspecified

Respondent

Applicant

Court

Case types

appeal

sentencing

trial

costs

motion

/Experts

Dr. McMaster

Criminal and Quasi-Criminal Law

Civil Litigation - Defendant

Civil Litigation - Plaintiff

Other Tribunals

Family and Matrimonial Law

Dr. McMaster

psychiatrist

Since 2005

cases · 22 yrs · OCA, SCJ, OCJ, ORB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

21 total

Melissa Ragsdale

26 cases2003–2008

Marshall A. Swadron

31 cases2000–2025

Janice Elaine Blackburn

Not Practising Law135 cases2001–2020

Stephen Borins

OCA561 cases2000–2009

Robert P. Armstrong

OCA1,438 cases2002–2013

Robert J. Sharpe

OCA2,070 cases1999–2020

OCACourt of AppealFeb 25, 2005

Appeal from Ontario Review Board dismissed; finding of significant threat to public safety upheld.

The appellant appealed a disposition by the Ontario Review Board.

The Court of Appeal held that the Board's determination that the appellant posed a significant threat to public safety was not unreasonable, relying on the hospital's report and expert testimony.

The Court found the disposition, which allowed the appellant to reside in approved community housing, to be the least onerous and least restrictive option available.

The appeal was dismissed.