Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Daniel Leone

10 cases2000–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2016

Request to reactivate deferred application granted to allow consideration of s. 45.1 dismissal.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the completion of a grievance proceeding.

The respondent opposed reactivation on the basis that the arbitrator had already dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate, noting that it cannot exercise its power to dismiss an application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code unless the application is active.

A preliminary hearing was ordered to determine whether the application should be dismissed under s. 45.1.

Woolcock v. Kaiser Aluminum Canada, 2016 HRTO 110

Susan Munn

29 cases2009–2020

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a related union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination, a poisoned work environment, and failure to advance in her career.

Prior to filing the application, she filed a union grievance raising the same allegations.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application.

The respondent supported deferral, while the applicant opposed it.

The Tribunal found substantial overlap between the application and the grievance and deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance arbitration to avoid inconsistent decisions.

Petrunti v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 108

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 20, 2016

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file a Reply or respond to Tribunal direction.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After the respondent filed a Response, the applicant failed to file a Reply by the deadline.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction warning the applicant that failure to file a Reply could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant did not respond to the direction.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Chowdhury v. Amaz Property Management, 2016 HRTO 89

Indira Sawh

23 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 20, 2016

Applicant ordered to produce arguably relevant video recordings and arrest records under Rule 16.1.

The respondents brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking the production of arguably relevant documents, specifically video recordings and arrest records, which the applicant had referenced during a summary hearing.

The applicant opposed the request, claiming he no longer had access to the raw data and could not use the recordings.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to produce all arguably relevant documents in his possession and to provide a written explanation regarding the status and relevance of the arrest records and recordings, in accordance with Rule 16.1.

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 84

Michael P. Fitzgibbon

2 cases1993–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 15, 2016

Human rights application regarding slippery floor tiles dismissed for lacking a link to disability.

The applicant, who has a physical disability, slipped and fell in a community centre dressing room and alleged that the slippery floor tiles constituted discrimination under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect of success because the slippery tiles posed a hazard to everyone, not just persons with disabilities, and thus did not constitute constructive discrimination.

The Tribunal also denied the applicant's request to amend his application to add reprisal allegations, directing him to file a new application instead.

Flores v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2016 HRTO 70

Michelle C. Folliott

1 case2016–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 15, 2016

Human rights application alleging age discrimination dismissed at summary hearing for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged that his employment was terminated due to age discrimination.

The Tribunal directed a summary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's evidence—that he was the youngest employee in his division and was once called a 'young punk' by a supervisor—was insufficient to establish a link between his termination and his age, especially given his acknowledged performance and reliability issues.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Sivarajasingam v. Metroland Media Group Ltd., 2016 HRTO 68

Daryn Jeffries

24 cases1995–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process due to a prior binding settlement and release.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment in employment.

Prior to filing, the applicant had settled a grievance concerning his termination, signing a Memorandum of Agreement and a Final Release discharging the employer from all claims, including those under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent argued the application was an abuse of process.

The applicant claimed he signed the release under duress from his union.

The Tribunal found no evidence of illegitimate pressure amounting to coercion and held that the release was binding.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process.

Randall Charass v. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2016 HRTO 50

Nicholas Saint-Martin

3 cases2014–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 11, 2016

Human rights application alleging race discrimination in hiring dismissed due to lack of evidence.

The applicant alleged that the respondent discriminated against her on the basis of race and colour when she was not hired for a seasonal retail position.

The applicant claimed she was treated coldly during a group interview compared to non-white candidates.

The Tribunal found no evidence to support an inference of discrimination, noting the applicant's own admission that her cellphone rang and she answered it during the interview, which the respondent cited as the non-discriminatory reason for not hiring her.

The application was dismissed.

Regan v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2016 HRTO 43

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2016

Adjournment granted due to applicants' representative's short-notice scheduling for her Oath of Citizenship.

The applicants requested an adjournment of a scheduled preliminary hearing because their representative received short notice to take her Oath of Citizenship on the same day.

The respondents opposed the request.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that the representative's Oath of Citizenship constituted an extraordinary circumstance under the Tribunal's Practice Direction, and the delay in notification did not cause significant inconvenience to the respondents.

K.O. v. Rouge Valley Health System, 2016 HRTO 28

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 31, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in goods and services against the Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not indicate discrimination on the basis of any enumerated grounds.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

David Harris v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership, 2015 HRTO 1752

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2015

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as issues will be addressed in upcoming arbitration.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking to reactivate her deferred human rights application, citing new incidents of alleged discrimination.

The respondent opposed the request, noting that the upcoming grievance arbitration would address the ongoing issues through consolidated grievances.

The Tribunal found it inappropriate to reactivate the application, as the new issues would be addressed in the grievance process, and ordered that the application remain deferred until the arbitration concluded.

Billie Jo Ramey v. ORNGE, 2015 HRTO 1747

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2015

Individual respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment because of sex and sexual solicitation.

The individual respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving multiple notices and warnings from the Tribunal.

Applying Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal issued an interim decision deeming the individual respondent to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceedings.

AM v. Windermere Manor Ltd., 2015 HRTO 1748

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 29, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond or update contact information.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of ongoing court proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently attempted to contact the applicant to inquire about the status of the court proceedings, but the communications were returned as undeliverable or went unanswered.

The applicant also failed to update his contact information as required by the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

G.M. v. The Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa, 2015 HRTO 1745

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 29, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal direction inquiring about his intentions with respect to the application.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Lisi v. Lowe’s Company Canada ULC, 2015 HRTO 1742

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 29, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and a subsequent follow-up email by the specified deadlines.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Susan Wingate v. A-Line Greeting Cards, 2015 HRTO 1743

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 4, 2015

Adjournment request denied as applicant failed to show extraordinary circumstances or relevance of witness testimony.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing because her main witness would be out of town caring for a sick person.

The respondent opposed the request, noting the applicant had not provided a will-say statement for the witness.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding that the request did not meet the 'extraordinary circumstances' requirement under the Practice Direction on Scheduling, particularly as the applicant had not filed a witness list and the proposed testimony did not appear relevant or essential.

Sheila Regan v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2015 HRTO 1650

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After failing to respond to the Tribunal's requests for hearing dates and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction warning that the application could be dismissed as abandoned, the applicant was deemed to have abandoned the application.

The application was dismissed.

Doug Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 1630

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant failed to establish grounds under Tribunal rules.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his three consolidated human rights applications as an abuse of process.

The applicant submitted documents concerning police carding and a law firm newsletter discussing abuse of process under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the submitted documents were either irrelevant to the basis of the original dismissal or failed to establish any new determinative facts, conflict with established case law, or other factors outweighing the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 1632

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 19, 2015

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction, directing the applicant to respond by a specified date.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Norman Traversy v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Labour, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, 2015 HRTO 1572

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 18, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice and a subsequent follow-up letter.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Michael Loranger v. KGHM International, Sudbury Mining Operations, 2015 HRTO 1559

Page 6 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 6 of 49 (975 cases)

Daniel Leone

Naomi Overend

Woolcock v. Kaiser Aluminum Canada, 2016 HRTO 110

Susan Munn

Naomi Overend

Petrunti v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 108

Naomi Overend

Chowdhury v. Amaz Property Management, 2016 HRTO 89

Indira Sawh

Naomi Overend

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 84

Michael P. Fitzgibbon

Naomi Overend

Flores v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, 2016 HRTO 70

Michelle C. Folliott

Naomi Overend

Sivarajasingam v. Metroland Media Group Ltd., 2016 HRTO 68

Daryn Jeffries

Naomi Overend

Randall Charass v. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2016 HRTO 50

Nicholas Saint-Martin

Naomi Overend

Regan v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2016 HRTO 43

Naomi Overend

K.O. v. Rouge Valley Health System, 2016 HRTO 28

Naomi Overend

David Harris v. Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership, 2015 HRTO 1752

Naomi Overend

Billie Jo Ramey v. ORNGE, 2015 HRTO 1747

Naomi Overend

AM v. Windermere Manor Ltd., 2015 HRTO 1748

Naomi Overend

G.M. v. The Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa, 2015 HRTO 1745

Naomi Overend

Lisi v. Lowe’s Company Canada ULC, 2015 HRTO 1742

Naomi Overend

Susan Wingate v. A-Line Greeting Cards, 2015 HRTO 1743

Naomi Overend

Sheila Regan v. Hudson’s Bay Company, 2015 HRTO 1650

Naomi Overend

Doug Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 1630

Naomi E. Calla

Lisa C. Cabel

David A. Gourlay

Antonella Ceddia

Naomi Overend

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2015 HRTO 1632

Naomi Overend

Norman Traversy v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Labour, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, 2015 HRTO 1572

Naomi Overend

Michael Loranger v. KGHM International, Sudbury Mining Operations, 2015 HRTO 1559

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society