Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jason Leduc v. Stephen Pender, 2016 HRTO 580

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing for his human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex.

After waiting past the usual commencement time and receiving no communication from the applicant, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 539

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance arbitration concerning the same suspension.

The respondent requested that the applicant's human rights application be deferred pending the completion of a related union grievance proceeding concerning a three-day suspension.

The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing that the Tribunal could provide swifter action and remedies not available at arbitration.

The Tribunal found that the central issue would be addressed at the upcoming grievance arbitration and that concurrent proceedings could lead to conflicting factual conclusions.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the outcome of the grievance process.

Nancy Seewald v. Greater Essex County District School Board, 2016 HRTO 459

Indira Sawh

23 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 7, 2016

Tribunal removes one individual respondent and orders applicant to disclose witness identity and willsay statement.

The respondents brought a request for an order during proceedings to remove the named individual respondents and to require the applicant to disclose the identity and willsay statement of a witness identified as 'John Doe'.

The Tribunal granted the request to remove one individual respondent whose conduct was not central to the case, but denied the request to remove the other two individual respondents pending evidence at the hearing.

The Tribunal also ordered the applicant to disclose the witness information.

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 436

Whitney Smith

2 cases2016–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 6, 2016

Adjournment granted due to senior counsel's family emergency constituting extraordinary circumstances.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the hearing scheduled for April 6 and 7, 2016, due to a serious family emergency involving its senior counsel.

The applicant opposed the request, arguing that the senior counsel was not the counsel of record and seeking costs.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that the family emergency constituted extraordinary circumstances under its Practice Direction, and declined to sanction the respondent.

E.L. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2016 HRTO 433

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 1, 2016

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to meet criteria and attempted to reargue case.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant argued that the Tribunal incorrectly required an 'intent to discriminate' in its original decision.

The Tribunal clarified that intent is not required and found that the applicant was merely attempting to reargue his case.

The request for reconsideration was denied as the applicant failed to meet the criteria under Rule 26.5.

Guillermo Flores v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville and James Ball, 2016 HRTO 418

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2016

Reconsideration of abandoned application denied where applicant failed to explain failure to communicate with Tribunal.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned after he failed to file a Reply.

The applicant submitted medical documentation and a list of personal difficulties, but failed to explain how these prevented him from communicating with the Tribunal by the deadline.

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not meet the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5 and denied the request.

Chowdhury v. Amaz Property Management, 2016 HRTO 411

Margaret Hoy

2 cases2012–2016

Lauri Reesor

23 cases2010–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2016

Application withdrawn with prejudice on the day of hearing to prevent forum shopping.

The applicant requested to withdraw his human rights application on the day of the hearing in order to commence a civil action.

The respondent opposed the withdrawal, arguing it was an abuse of process given the resources spent preparing for the hearing, and requested that any withdrawal be with prejudice.

The Tribunal granted the request to withdraw the application, but ordered that it be with prejudice to the applicant's ability to file a new application regarding the same issues.

Robert Loro v. Complex Services Inc., 2016 HRTO 412

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to respond to multiple directions from the Tribunal to provide written submissions and confirm that his new mailing address had been provided to the respondents.

After several warnings that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned, the applicant failed to communicate by the final deadline.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Khalid Ilahi v. Nilesh Patel and Bhavanaben Patel, 2016 HRTO 413

Patricia Matusiak

20 cases2005–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 30, 2016

Respondent granted limited access to applicant's medical file to respond to disability discrimination claim.

The applicant alleged that a sick leave provision in the collective agreement discriminated against him on the basis of disability.

The respondent requested an order for disclosure of the applicant's occupational health and claims management file to respond to the application.

The Tribunal found the file arguably relevant to establish whether the applicant had a disability resulting in absences, but limited disclosure to documents from April 2013 onwards to protect privacy.

The respondent's request for an extension of time to file its response was also granted.

Carvalho v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 395

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 24, 2016

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

E.R. v. Toronto Catholic Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 389

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 9, 2016

Human rights application finally disposed of by consent order following parties' settlement.

The parties agreed to resolve the human rights application and filed a Form 25 requesting a consent order under section 45.9(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal ordered the organizational respondent's name amended and finally disposed of the application in accordance with the settlement.

Deorajh v. Pioneer Food Services Limited, 2016 HRTO 309

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 9, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents requested early dismissal on the basis that the applicant had commenced a civil suit regarding the same issues, and requested a summary hearing.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to respond to these requests.

After the applicant failed to respond to multiple Tribunal directions, including a Case Assessment Direction warning of potential dismissal, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jacqueline Bell v. William Osler Health System and G4S Security Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2016 HRTO 311

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Gomes v. DHL Express, 2016 HRTO 240

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2016

Age discrimination claim regarding free transit for children dismissed as Code defines age as 18+.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination because the respondent transit commission allows children 12 and under to travel for free, while he, born in 1983, must pay a fare.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the Human Rights Code defines 'age' as 18 years or more, meaning preferential treatment for children is outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant's response also raised discounts for university students and seniors, but the Tribunal noted student status is not linked to age and the Code explicitly permits preferential treatment for persons 65 and over.

The application was dismissed.

Garisto v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 230

Brian Silva

7 cases2013–2016

Alessandra Ottaviano

Not Practising Law5 cases2016–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2016

Application dismissed summarily; family status claim outside jurisdiction and age claim lacked evidence.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of family status and age after being fired from a business owned by his wife's uncle.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's relationship with the owner did not fall within the Code's definition of family status, which is limited to parent and child relationships.

Furthermore, the applicant could not provide any evidence linking his termination to his age.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Patel v. Quick Shoe Shine Limited, 2016 HRTO 211

J. Paul Wearing

16 cases1984–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2016

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as prior grievances did not address harassment allegations.

The respondents requested that the human rights application alleging age discrimination be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that grievance proceedings and an internal investigation had appropriately dealt with its substance.

The Tribunal found that the arbitration awards did not address the harassment allegations and that an internal investigation is generally not a 'proceeding' within the meaning of s. 45.1.

The request to dismiss was denied and the matter was scheduled for mediation.

Thomas v. Ideal Child Care Services Group, 2016 HRTO 210

Patty Murray

25 cases1994–2022

Katherine Ferreira

15 cases2013–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as applicant failed to link workplace conflicts and termination to protected grounds.

The applicant, a former employee of the respondent hospital, alleged discrimination and harassment on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin, disability, sex, and reprisal.

After hearing the applicant's evidence, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish a link between the adverse treatment she experienced—including exclusion by co-workers, discipline, and termination—and any protected grounds under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal noted issues with the applicant's credibility and perception of events, and found no evidence that the employer's actions were discriminatory or constituted reprisal for enforcing Code rights.

The application was dismissed.

Tara Myers v. William Osler Health System and Laura Albisu, 2016 HRTO 199

Greg Bullen

47 cases2009–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 5, 2016

Human rights application regarding WSIB benefits dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to goods, services, and facilities because of disability and age, relating to the handling of his WSIB benefits.

The respondents requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the core of the applicant's dispute involved the alleged misapplication of WSIB legislation and policies, which falls outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

As the applicant failed to propose any evidence linking the respondents' conduct to his disability or age, the application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Bradford v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2016 HRTO 172

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2016

Tribunal denies adjournment and request to add respondent mid-hearing; orders disclosure of lease agreement.

The applicant brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking to add a respondent, replace the adjudicator, and obtain a copy of a tenancy agreement.

The applicant's newly retained paralegal also requested an adjournment of the upcoming hearing.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, noting that last-minute retention of a representative does not constitute exceptional circumstances.

The request to add a respondent was denied due to the unfairness of adding a party after two days of hearing had already occurred.

The recusal request was deferred to the start of the next hearing date.

The respondent was ordered to produce the lease agreement.

Silverberg v. Nixon Lau, 2016 HRTO 123

Page 5 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 5 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Jason Leduc v. Stephen Pender, 2016 HRTO 580

Lynn Donnelly

Indira Sawh

Naomi Overend

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 539

Naomi Overend

Nancy Seewald v. Greater Essex County District School Board, 2016 HRTO 459

Indira Sawh

Naomi Overend

Landry v. Ontario Provincial Police, 2016 HRTO 436

Whitney Smith

Naomi Overend

E.L. v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2016 HRTO 433

Naomi Overend

Guillermo Flores v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville and James Ball, 2016 HRTO 418

Naomi Overend

Chowdhury v. Amaz Property Management, 2016 HRTO 411

Margaret Hoy

Lauri Reesor

Naomi Overend

Robert Loro v. Complex Services Inc., 2016 HRTO 412

Naomi Overend

Khalid Ilahi v. Nilesh Patel and Bhavanaben Patel, 2016 HRTO 413

Patricia Matusiak

Naomi Overend

Carvalho v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 395

Naomi Overend

E.R. v. Toronto Catholic Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 389

Naomi Overend

Deorajh v. Pioneer Food Services Limited, 2016 HRTO 309

Naomi Overend

Jacqueline Bell v. William Osler Health System and G4S Security Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2016 HRTO 311

Naomi Overend

Gomes v. DHL Express, 2016 HRTO 240

Naomi Overend

Garisto v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 230

Brian Silva

Alessandra Ottaviano

Naomi Overend

Patel v. Quick Shoe Shine Limited, 2016 HRTO 211

J. Paul Wearing

Naomi Overend

Thomas v. Ideal Child Care Services Group, 2016 HRTO 210

Patty Murray

Katherine Ferreira

Naomi Overend

Tara Myers v. William Osler Health System and Laura Albisu, 2016 HRTO 199

Greg Bullen

Naomi Overend

Bradford v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2016 HRTO 172

Naomi Overend

Silverberg v. Nixon Lau, 2016 HRTO 123

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns