Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with medical documentation orders.

The applicant requested an adjournment of her human rights hearing due to health concerns but failed to file the required Form 10 or provide medical documentation as directed by the Tribunal.

After the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned, it reconsidered its decision upon discovering a late fax from the applicant.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide detailed medical submissions by a specific date.

The applicant failed to communicate further or comply with the order.

Consequently, the Tribunal found the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Burkett v. Red Hill Co-Operative Homes Inc., 2016 HRTO 932

Farah Baloo

Practising Law - Employed14 cases2009–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2016

Summary hearing request to dismiss human rights applications for no reasonable prospect of success denied.

The applicants filed human rights applications alleging discrimination on the basis of family status and sex against Unifor and Tim Carrie.

The allegations arose from their attendance at Unifor's Family Education Program, where they were asked to leave after failing to participate in mandatory sessions due to the applicant's high-risk pregnancy and the needs of their 18-month-old daughter.

The respondents requested that the applications be dismissed at a summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the respondents' request, finding that based on the applicants' clarified factual allegations regarding the need for accommodation, the applications had a reasonable prospect of success.

Krykunenko v. Unifor, 2016 HRTO 930

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2016

Reconsideration of abandoned application denied where applicant failed to provide requested medical documentation explaining delay.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application as abandoned.

She claimed she had been hospitalized for two weeks and was unable to attend to her affairs.

The Tribunal directed her to provide supporting medical documentation and specify the dates of her hospitalization, but she failed to do so.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration, finding that a two-week hospitalization did not explain her failure to communicate with the Tribunal for three months.

Bell v. William Osler Health System, 2016 HRTO 937

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 14, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Stoute v. Eatonville Nursing Home, 2016 HRTO 923

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to a Tribunal directive.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Request to Dismiss, directing the applicant to provide submissions regarding a full and final release.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Goomatie Aziz v. Calyx Transportation Group Inc., 2016 HRTO 914

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2016

Application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to Tribunal.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and subsequently failed to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence directing him to advise of his intentions regarding the application.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Gilmour v. 1427555 Ontario Inc., 2016 HRTO 920

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 13, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

K.P. v. Caffe Demetre in Oakville, 2016 HRTO 921

Susan Munn

29 cases2009–2020

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 11, 2016

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied pending completion of ongoing grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the completion of a related union grievance process.

The applicant argued that she continued to experience ongoing problems in the workplace.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant provided no basis to exercise its discretion to reactivate the application before the grievance process concluded.

Irene Petrunti v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services, 2016 HRTO 912

Andrew Pinto

27 cases1997–2019

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2016

Human rights application dismissed; applicant resigned before requesting accommodation for alleged disability.

The applicant, a daycare worker, alleged she developed a disability in her arm and shoulder due to heavy lifting at work, and that her employment was terminated when she requested accommodation and time off.

The respondent maintained that the applicant had resigned during a staff meeting and that her subsequent requests for accommodation were an attempt to resile from her resignation.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had indeed resigned and had not requested accommodation prior to doing so.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant failed to establish that her disability was a factor in the termination of her employment, and dismissed the application.

Gonzalez v. Cudley Corners Child Care Centre Vaughan Ltd., 2016 HRTO 900

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 17, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After failing to attend a scheduled mediation session and failing to respond to subsequent Tribunal correspondence inquiring about his intentions, the applicant was deemed to have abandoned the application.

The application was dismissed.

Derek Callaway v. Golden Valley Farms Inc., 2016 HRTO 823

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the absence.

After the Tribunal sent a letter warning that failure to respond might result in abandonment, the applicant did not reply.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jason Stuart v. Barrie Calebaut Canada, 2016 HRTO 816

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Llewellyn v. Ontario (Disability Support Program), 2016 HRTO 812

Dianne Jozefacki

9 cases2015–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 1, 2016

Human rights application dismissed; student teacher failed to prove termination of placement was discriminatory.

The applicant, a student teacher, alleged discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin after her placement with the respondent school board was terminated abruptly.

The termination followed a confrontation with her supervising teacher regarding a lesson plan and timing.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's relationship with the respondents was one of services, not employment.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding no reliable evidence that the applicant's ethnic origin was a factor in her treatment or the termination of her placement, and attributing the issues to the applicant's lateness, failure to communicate absences, and performance concerns.

Chisholm v. York Catholic District School Board, 2016 HRTO 752

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a related grievance arbitration proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondent university for failing to nominate him for a Canada Research Chair.

Prior to the application, the applicant filed a consolidated grievance addressing the same allegations.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the outcome of the grievance arbitration.

Finding that the grievance dealt with the same facts and issues, the Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Amir Attaran v. The University of Ottawa, 2016 HRTO 690

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2016

Tribunal reconsiders dismissal for abandonment after discovering applicant faxed medical adjournment request shortly after deadline.

The Tribunal, on its own motion, reconsidered its previous decision dismissing the application for abandonment.

The Tribunal had dismissed the application after the applicant failed to communicate by a specified deadline regarding her ability to participate in a hearing.

However, the Tribunal later discovered that a letter seeking a medical adjournment had been faxed shortly after the deadline but before the dismissal decision was released.

Concluding that the application had not been abandoned, the Tribunal reconsidered the dismissal and ordered the applicant to provide medical documentation supporting her request for an adjournment.

Darlene Burkett v. Red Hill Co-operative Homes Inc., Bridget Bayliss and The Agency for Cooperative Housing, 2016 HRTO 684

Lauri Reesor

23 cases2010–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2016

Reconsideration granted; applicant demonstrated no intent to abandon application despite missing Tribunal deadline.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application as abandoned.

The application had been dismissed after the applicant failed to contact the Tribunal by a specified deadline to reschedule or adjourn the hearing.

However, evidence showed the applicant had sought medical confirmation regarding her ability to participate, demonstrating she did not intend to abandon the application.

The Tribunal granted the reconsideration request and ordered the applicant to file detailed submissions regarding her ability to proceed with a hearing.

Robin Royeton v. Toronto District School Board, 2016 HRTO 644

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after deceased applicant's estate failed to respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal was subsequently advised that the applicant had passed away.

The Tribunal wrote to the applicant's estate requesting confirmation of an authorized estate trustee to proceed with the application.

The estate failed to respond by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Donaldson v. Waters Edge Care Community, 2016 HRTO 621

Sundeep Gokhale

1 case2016–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2016

Application alleging discrimination based on perceived disability dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a union steward, filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on perceived disability after a manager referred to his 'mental imbalance' in an email.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the single comment did not amount to discrimination under the Code and that the applicant could not link other alleged adverse treatment to the ground of disability.

The application was dismissed.

Markunas v. Commercial Bakeries Corporation, 2016 HRTO 598

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 4, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned following applicant's death and estate's failure to respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Prior to the scheduled summary hearing, the applicant passed away.

The Tribunal directed the applicant's estate to provide a certificate of appointment of estate trustee or submissions on why the application should proceed without one.

Having received no response, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Morley v. Paramed Home Health Care, 2016 HRTO 596

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jason Leduc v. Stephen Pender, 2016 HRTO 580

Page 4 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 4 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Burkett v. Red Hill Co-Operative Homes Inc., 2016 HRTO 932

Farah Baloo

Naomi Overend

Krykunenko v. Unifor, 2016 HRTO 930

Naomi Overend

Bell v. William Osler Health System, 2016 HRTO 937

Naomi Overend

Stoute v. Eatonville Nursing Home, 2016 HRTO 923

Naomi Overend

Goomatie Aziz v. Calyx Transportation Group Inc., 2016 HRTO 914

Naomi Overend

Gilmour v. 1427555 Ontario Inc., 2016 HRTO 920

Naomi Overend

K.P. v. Caffe Demetre in Oakville, 2016 HRTO 921

Susan Munn

Naomi Overend

Irene Petrunti v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Ministry of Community and Social Services, 2016 HRTO 912

Andrew Pinto

Naomi Overend

Gonzalez v. Cudley Corners Child Care Centre Vaughan Ltd., 2016 HRTO 900

Naomi Overend

Derek Callaway v. Golden Valley Farms Inc., 2016 HRTO 823

Naomi Overend

Jason Stuart v. Barrie Calebaut Canada, 2016 HRTO 816

Naomi Overend

Llewellyn v. Ontario (Disability Support Program), 2016 HRTO 812

Dianne Jozefacki

Naomi Overend

Chisholm v. York Catholic District School Board, 2016 HRTO 752

Natasha Udell

David Bolger

Naomi Overend

Amir Attaran v. The University of Ottawa, 2016 HRTO 690

Naomi Overend

Darlene Burkett v. Red Hill Co-operative Homes Inc., Bridget Bayliss and The Agency for Cooperative Housing, 2016 HRTO 684

Lauri Reesor

Naomi Overend

Robin Royeton v. Toronto District School Board, 2016 HRTO 644

Naomi Overend

Donaldson v. Waters Edge Care Community, 2016 HRTO 621

Sundeep Gokhale

Naomi Overend

Markunas v. Commercial Bakeries Corporation, 2016 HRTO 598

Naomi Overend

Morley v. Paramed Home Health Care, 2016 HRTO 596

Naomi Overend

Jason Leduc v. Stephen Pender, 2016 HRTO 580

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent

for Pizza Nova

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale