Stoute v. Eatonville Nursing Home, 2016 HRTO 923

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Roslyn Stoute

Applicant

-and-

Eatonville Nursing Home and Maria De’Silva

Respondents

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend

Date: July 14, 2016

Citation: 2016 HRTO 923

Indexed as: Stoute v. Eatonville Nursing Home

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on March 14, 2016.

2On April 1, 2016 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Incomplete Application and Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than May 2, 2016. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.