Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

BMO Field removed as a respondent on consent in a racial discrimination application.

The applicant alleged discrimination with respect to services because of race and colour by two police officers outside BMO Field.

BMO Field filed a Request for Summary Hearing to be removed as a respondent, arguing it is not a legal entity and no allegations were made against it.

The applicant consented to the removal, noting he mistakenly named BMO Field instead of the security guards' employer.

The Tribunal removed BMO Field as a respondent on consent.

Adore v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 260

Stefanie Chin-Yick

1 case2013–2013

D. Russ Makepeace

4 cases2008–2013

Carl Peterson

53 cases1984–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2013

Four human rights applications alleging discriminatory taxi pricing consolidated; fifth application to proceed separately.

The applicant filed five separate human rights applications against five taxi companies alleging discriminatory pricing for accessible cabs.

The applicant sought to consolidate the applications.

Four of the respondents consented to consolidation.

The fifth respondent, Crown Taxi Inc., opposed consolidation on the basis that it did not operate accessible cabs and sought to be removed as a respondent.

The Tribunal consolidated the four consenting applications but ordered the application against Crown Taxi Inc. to proceed separately, as its preliminary jurisdictional issue did not share common issues of fact and law with the others.

Alessia Di Virgilio v. 1210670 Ontario Inc., 2013 HRTO 248

Glorie Alfred

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2010–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 6, 2013

Applicants' parents ordered to consent to disclosure of student records for summary hearing.

The respondent school principal requested an order directing the applicants' parents to provide written permission to access and disclose the applicants' Ontario Student Records (OSR) for an upcoming summary hearing.

The applicants' parents agreed only on the condition that other parents and teachers also provide consent.

The Tribunal found the applicants' conditions unhelpful and directed the parents to provide written permission, noting that failure to do so could result in the applications being dismissed as an abuse of process.

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 220

Dave Steele

11 cases2012–2014

Christopher Hacio

5 cases2013–2018

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 1, 2013

Union granted leave to intervene in member's human rights application against employer.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant's union, CUPE, filed a Request to Intervene after the application against it was dismissed.

The respondent filed a response expressing concern that the union intended to represent the applicant, which the union clarified was not its intent.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting that a union typically has an interest in an application brought by a member of its bargaining unit.

Lori Ann McLean v. Riverside Health Care Facilities Inc., 2013 HRTO 185

Jordan Waltman

2 cases2013–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2013

Age discrimination claim dismissed at summary hearing; race discrimination claim allowed to proceed.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of race, age, and disability after not being hired by the respondent.

At a summary hearing, the applicant withdrew the disability claim and consented to removing the individual respondent.

The Tribunal dismissed the age discrimination claim, finding no reasonable prospect of success as the applicant failed to provide evidence linking his age to the hiring decision.

However, the Tribunal allowed the race discrimination claim to proceed, as the applicant was asked about his ability to speak Spanish during the interview, which required further evidentiary testing.

Mauricio Larromana v. Collectcorp Inc., 2013 HRTO 144

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal direction inquiring about his intentions with respect to the application.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Daniel Kozen v. Laurentian Publishing Limited – Northern Life, 2013 HRTO 145

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2013

Respondent given 14 days to file a complete response to human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

One respondent, Reviera Nursing Home, failed to file a complete Response by the deadline, submitting only a one-page fax.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing Reviera Nursing Home to file a complete Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to the respondent.

Mclaughlin v. Compass Group Canada, 2013 HRTO 132

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 24, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to housing because of disability.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal direction inquiring whether he intended to proceed with the application.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

François Boudreau v. King Street Holdings Ltd., 2013 HRTO 128

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2013

Respondent given 10 days to file a response before Tribunal proceeds in default.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a response within 10 days, warning that failure to do so could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the respondent to have accepted the allegations, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Paulo Fernandes v. Smart Corporation, 2013 HRTO 113

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 23, 2013

Respondents granted 14 days to file a late Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents failed to file a Response by the deadline set out in the Notice of Application, although an incomplete email was received from an individual associated with the organizational respondent.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondents to file a Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure.

Cheryl Rak v. Ina Grafton Gage Home (Toronto), 2013 HRTO 124

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Arthur Zeilikman

In Private Practice12 cases2012–2022

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 18, 2013

Applicant permitted to amend human rights application to include post-filing allegations of discrimination and termination.

The applicant sought to amend his human rights application to include allegations of ongoing harassment, discrimination, and reprisal that occurred after the initial filing, culminating in the termination of his employment.

The respondent opposed the amendment, arguing prejudice and that the applicant had previously withdrawn a request to expedite based on these events.

The Tribunal allowed the amendment, finding that the applicant, who was unrepresented at the time, had consistently attempted to raise these issues and that the respondent would not be prejudiced as the events were recently the subject of an arbitration.

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2013 HRTO 97

Paula Seymour

10 cases2009–2024

David A. Gourlay

37 cases2010–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 11, 2013

Reconsideration granted to revive applications dismissed as abandoned due to counsel's inadvertence.

The applicants requested a reconsideration of the Tribunal's decision to dismiss their human rights applications as abandoned.

The applications had been dismissed after counsel failed to respond to a status update request due to inadvertence and strained circumstances.

The Tribunal found that the applicants had instructed counsel to respond and that it would be unjust to penalize them for their counsel's error.

The request for reconsideration was granted, and the applications were revived.

Cushnie v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 63

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 11, 2013

Human rights application against police dismissed summarily for lacking a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of age, sex, disability, and reprisal by the respondent police service and an individual officer regarding their investigation of a parking lot altercation.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing in writing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Finding that the applicant provided no evidence linking the respondents' alleged inaction to any prohibited ground, the Tribunal dismissed the application as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Woodwork v. Halton Regional Police Services, 2013 HRTO 65

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 11, 2013

Tribunal finds housing corporation breached settlement agreement; orders specific performance and $4,000 in damages.

The applicant filed an Application alleging that the respondent breached the terms of a May 2011 settlement agreement resolving a previous human rights complaint.

The settlement required the respondent to issue an apology, provide access to a pottery club space, disseminate rules for sharing the space, assist with finding low-cost dental services, and maintain open communication.

The Tribunal found that the respondent fundamentally breached all these terms, ignoring the applicant's communications and failing to take required actions.

The Tribunal ordered specific performance of the outstanding terms and awarded the applicant $4,000 as compensation for injury to his dignity, feelings, and self-respect.

Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2013 HRTO 66

William Doodnauth

1 case2013–2013

Glenn Christie

37 cases1998–2020

Anita Lyon

13 cases1987–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Human rights application dismissed due to prosecutorial immunity and failure to meet the limitation period.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on sex after police charged him with assault but refused to charge his ex-girlfriend, and the Crown subsequently withdrew private charges against her.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the Ministry of the Attorney General on the basis of prosecutorial immunity.

The Tribunal also dismissed the application against the Barrie Police Services Board, finding it was filed outside the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code and the applicant failed to demonstrate the delay was incurred in good faith.

Melo v. Barrie Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 47

Matthew Horner

19 cases2008–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2013

Human rights application partially dismissed for delay regarding 2004-2005 allegations; 2012 allegations allowed to proceed.

The respondent requested to dismiss the human rights application for delay.

The applicant alleged discrimination regarding access to a medical procedure in 2004-2005 and again in 2012.

The Tribunal found the 2004-2005 allegations were out of time and the applicant failed to provide a good faith explanation for the delay.

However, the 2012 allegations were timely.

The Tribunal dismissed the 2004-2005 allegations but allowed the 2012 allegations to proceed.

Hodgson v. Ontario (Health and Long Term Care), 2013 HRTO 54

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 8, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with disclosure obligations.

The applicant failed to comply with his obligations under Rules 16 and 17 of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice to deliver and file a witness list, witness statements, and documents 45 days prior to the hearing.

Despite a Case Assessment Direction warning that the application may be dismissed as abandoned if he did not comply, the applicant failed to provide the required materials or request an extension.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had abandoned his application and dismissed it.

Kearney v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2013 HRTO 33

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for failing to link alleged poor customer service to a protected ground.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on ancestry, place of origin, and ethnic origin after the respondent retail store refused to sell him a computer and ignored his complaints.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application did not link the alleged poor service to any protected ground under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that it does not adjudicate general claims of unfairness or poor customer service absent a nexus to a Code ground.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Alexandre Papouchine v. Staples Canada, 2013 HRTO 18

Karen C. Watters

1 case2013–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2013

Respondent's request for early particulars of damages dismissed as premature under Tribunal rules.

The respondent in a human rights application filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking particulars of the applicant's claim for damages.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that particulars of damages are generally not required at this stage of the proceedings.

Under Rule 16 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, disclosure is triggered by the issuance of a Notice of Hearing, which had not yet occurred, and the respondent failed to identify exceptional circumstances to justify early production.

Distler v. HILL Program Inc., 2013 HRTO 22

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 3, 2013

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as allegations did not constitute reprisal under the Code.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to services because of reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the allegations did not appear to constitute reprisal under the Human Rights Code.

The applicant's submissions referenced Charter breaches rather than Code rights.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as it fell outside its jurisdiction.

Clement v. Trenton OPP, 2013 HRTO 8

Page 20 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 20 of 49 (975 cases)

Michele Wright

David Lederman

Naomi Overend

Adore v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 260

Stefanie Chin-Yick

D. Russ Makepeace

Carl Peterson

Naomi Overend

Alessia Di Virgilio v. 1210670 Ontario Inc., 2013 HRTO 248

Glorie Alfred

Naomi Overend

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 220

Dave Steele

Christopher Hacio

Naomi Overend

Lori Ann McLean v. Riverside Health Care Facilities Inc., 2013 HRTO 185

Jordan Waltman

Naomi Overend

Mauricio Larromana v. Collectcorp Inc., 2013 HRTO 144

Naomi Overend

Daniel Kozen v. Laurentian Publishing Limited – Northern Life, 2013 HRTO 145

Naomi Overend

Mclaughlin v. Compass Group Canada, 2013 HRTO 132

Naomi Overend

François Boudreau v. King Street Holdings Ltd., 2013 HRTO 128

Naomi Overend

Paulo Fernandes v. Smart Corporation, 2013 HRTO 113

Naomi Overend

Cheryl Rak v. Ina Grafton Gage Home (Toronto), 2013 HRTO 124

Patricia G. Murray

Arthur Zeilikman

Naomi Overend

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2013 HRTO 97

Paula Seymour

David A. Gourlay

Naomi Overend

Cushnie v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 63

Naomi Overend

Woodwork v. Halton Regional Police Services, 2013 HRTO 65

Naomi Overend

Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2013 HRTO 66

William Doodnauth

Glenn Christie

Anita Lyon

Naomi Overend

Melo v. Barrie Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 47

Matthew Horner

Naomi Overend

Hodgson v. Ontario (Health and Long Term Care), 2013 HRTO 54

Naomi Overend

Kearney v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2013 HRTO 33

Naomi Overend

Alexandre Papouchine v. Staples Canada, 2013 HRTO 18

Karen C. Watters

Naomi Overend

Distler v. HILL Program Inc., 2013 HRTO 22

Naomi Overend

Clement v. Trenton OPP, 2013 HRTO 8

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services