Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2013

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a response.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite multiple notices and an interim decision directing it to do so.

Pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the application and waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceeding.

Sabrina Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Hortons Store No. 2533, 2013 HRTO 605

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 4, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional direction.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to provide submissions on whether the application fell outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

David Costello v. Bell Technical Solutions Inc., 2013 HRTO 557

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2013

Respondent given final 14-day extension to file Response or face default proceedings under Rule 5.5.

The Tribunal previously deferred and then reactivated a human rights application, ordering the respondent to file a Response.

The respondent failed to do so, citing ongoing settlement negotiations.

After negotiations failed, the Tribunal again directed the respondent to file a Response, which was ignored.

The Tribunal issued this interim decision warning the respondent that failure to file a Response within 14 days could result in the Tribunal proceeding without them and deeming them to have accepted the allegations, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Birchall v. Andres, 2013 HRTO 527

Tribunal allows applicant to amend human rights application to add new grounds and post-filing events.

The applicant sought to amend her human rights application to include allegations of discrimination on the basis of race, colour, and disability, and to add events that occurred after the initial filing, including her termination.

The respondent objected due to delay and prejudice.

The Tribunal allowed the amendments, noting that the respondent had already addressed the subsequent events in its Response, minimizing any prejudice.

The Tribunal deferred ruling on the respondent's request for third-party production until the third party was properly served.

Veronique Susan Nyonzima v. Idlewyld Manor, 2013 HRTO 513

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide submissions on federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment against Bell Technical Solutions Inc. The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to provide submissions on whether the matter fell under federal jurisdiction, noting a previous decision finding the respondent's employment relations were federally regulated.

The applicant failed to provide submissions within the required time.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Abay v. Bell Technical Solutions Inc., 2013 HRTO 511

Laura K. Williams

8 cases2001–2016

Glorie Alfred

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2010–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 20, 2013

Applications against daycare director dismissed for delay; parents ordered to permit access to student records.

The applicants filed human rights applications against a school principal and a daycare executive director.

In an interim decision, the Tribunal addressed preliminary issues.

The Tribunal ordered the applicants' parents to provide written permission for the principal to access the applicants' Ontario Student Records, failing which the applications against her would be dismissed as an abuse of process; the parents complied before the deadline.

The Tribunal dismissed the applications against the daycare executive director on the basis of delay, finding they were filed outside the one-year time limit and the applicants failed to demonstrate the delay was incurred in good faith.

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 473

Douglas H. Levitt

19 cases2010–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 15, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled hearing.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing of his human rights application.

The Tribunal waited 30 minutes and, having received no communication from the applicant explaining his absence, deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Alaa Badawi v. York Condominium Corporation No. 90, 2013 HRTO 443

Lisa Kwasek

14 cases2009–2016

Bryce Chandler

4 cases2008–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 15, 2013

Adjournment request denied; late retention of counsel does not constitute extraordinary circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates because he had recently retained counsel who had other obligations and insufficient time to prepare.

The respondent objected, noting prejudice due to counsel's upcoming maternity leave.

The Tribunal denied the request, stating that late retention of counsel does not constitute extraordinary circumstances justifying an adjournment under its Practice Direction on Scheduling.

Siddall v. St. Clair College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2013 HRTO 444

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file required reply and submissions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent filed a Response and a Request to Dismiss.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a Reply and written submissions by a specified date, warning that failure to do so might result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to file the required documents by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Bradley v. Corporation of the City of Sarnia, 2013 HRTO 442

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to NOID.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant was directed to respond but failed to do so by the deadline.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

William Toth v. Express Personnel, 2013 HRTO 417

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2013

Respondent granted 14 days to file a late Response to an Application for Contravention of Settlement.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement under section 45.9 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Luana Biamonte v. Roger Thompson, 2013 HRTO 403

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant's death and Estate's failure to respond.

The applicant filed a human rights application but passed away before the scheduled mediation.

The Tribunal attempted to contact the applicant's Estate to determine if an Estate Trustee had been appointed and if the Estate intended to continue the application.

After receiving no response to its notice, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

White v. Technical Standards and Safety Authority, 2013 HRTO 402

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to Tribunal inquiries.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the conclusion of a proceeding before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

The Tribunal subsequently requested an update on the College proceeding, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's inquiry.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

McPhee v. Collins, 2013 HRTO 388

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal had previously deferred the application pending the conclusion of ongoing grievance proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently wrote to the applicant requesting an update on the status of the grievance proceedings and warned that failure to respond could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond to multiple communications.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Rosemary Tomlinson v. J. Provost Contracting Ltd. and James Murphy, 2013 HRTO 384

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed a human rights application which was deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing grievance proceedings.

The Tribunal later requested an update on the status of the grievance proceedings, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's communications.

Consequently, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Sonia Connell v. City of Toronto, 2013 HRTO 382

Madeleine Loewenberg

9 cases2008–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as applicant failed to establish adverse treatment regarding accommodation and termination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, age, and reprisal.

She claimed she was terminated and denied accommodation after suffering workplace injuries.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was not terminated, but rather was issued a Record of Employment for illness to allow her to collect sickness benefits.

The Tribunal also found that the respondent had offered modified work, but the applicant was physically unable to perform any available duties.

As the applicant failed to establish any adverse treatment, the application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Grills v. Procter and Gamble Inc., 2013 HRTO 371

Sandra G. Drozd

2 cases2013–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 21, 2013

Tribunal reactivates application to substitute respondents, then defers it pending related HPARB proceedings.

The applicant brought a human rights application alleging discrimination in medical treatment while the claimant was incarcerated.

The application had been deferred pending a related proceeding before the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB).

The respondents sought to reactivate the application.

The applicant requested to remove one doctor as a respondent and add another, having learned the correct identity of the attending physician.

The Tribunal granted the requests to reactivate, remove the incorrect respondent, and add the new respondent.

The Tribunal then deferred the application again pending the completion of the HPARB proceeding involving the newly added respondent.

Desbiens v. Chaker, 2013 HRTO 297

Hubert Leung

3 cases2013–2024

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 20, 2013

Adjournment request denied; late retention of counsel does not constitute extraordinary circumstances.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing on the basis that counsel was recently retained and needed time to review the file.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that parties are expected to retain counsel in a timely fashion and that adjournments are only granted in extraordinary circumstances.

Peter Simone v. Amazing Custom Fabricators Inc., 2013 HRTO 285

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 15, 2013

Adjournment of summary hearing denied; request to add respondent premature before reasonable prospect of success determined.

The applicant requested an adjournment of an upcoming summary hearing in order to amend his application to add the respondent's employer as a party.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the summary hearing was scheduled to determine whether the application had a reasonable prospect of success and whether it had been dealt with in a prior settlement.

The Tribunal held that adding a respondent was unnecessary at this stage, as the issue would become moot if the application were dismissed, and could be pursued later if it survived the summary hearing.

Lloy v. Meikle, 2013 HRTO 276

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 15, 2013

Personal respondent given final 14 days to file response before Tribunal proceeds without notice.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the corporate and personal respondents.

The corporate respondent filed a response and provided a new address for the personal respondent.

The personal respondent failed to file a response by the revised deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision providing the personal respondent with a final 14 days to file a response and explain the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to him pursuant to Rule 5.5.

Julie Costigane v. Nyood Restaurant and Arturo Gayle, 2013 HRTO 271

Page 19 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 19 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Sabrina Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Hortons Store No. 2533, 2013 HRTO 605

Naomi Overend

David Costello v. Bell Technical Solutions Inc., 2013 HRTO 557

Naomi Overend

Birchall v. Andres, 2013 HRTO 527

Jane M. Gooding

Francois Sauvageau

Naomi Overend

Veronique Susan Nyonzima v. Idlewyld Manor, 2013 HRTO 513

Naomi Overend

Abay v. Bell Technical Solutions Inc., 2013 HRTO 511

Laura K. Williams

Glorie Alfred

Naomi Overend

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 473

Douglas H. Levitt

Naomi Overend

Alaa Badawi v. York Condominium Corporation No. 90, 2013 HRTO 443

Lisa Kwasek

Bryce Chandler

Naomi Overend

Siddall v. St. Clair College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2013 HRTO 444

Naomi Overend

Bradley v. Corporation of the City of Sarnia, 2013 HRTO 442

Naomi Overend

William Toth v. Express Personnel, 2013 HRTO 417

Naomi Overend

Luana Biamonte v. Roger Thompson, 2013 HRTO 403

Naomi Overend

White v. Technical Standards and Safety Authority, 2013 HRTO 402

Naomi Overend

McPhee v. Collins, 2013 HRTO 388

Naomi Overend

Rosemary Tomlinson v. J. Provost Contracting Ltd. and James Murphy, 2013 HRTO 384

Naomi Overend

Sonia Connell v. City of Toronto, 2013 HRTO 382

Madeleine Loewenberg

Naomi Overend

Grills v. Procter and Gamble Inc., 2013 HRTO 371

Sandra G. Drozd

Naomi Overend

Desbiens v. Chaker, 2013 HRTO 297

Hubert Leung

Naomi Overend

Peter Simone v. Amazing Custom Fabricators Inc., 2013 HRTO 285

Naomi Overend

Lloy v. Meikle, 2013 HRTO 276

Naomi Overend

Julie Costigane v. Nyood Restaurant and Arturo Gayle, 2013 HRTO 271

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent