Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2013

Reconsideration request denied as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria or link allegations to Code grounds.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his human rights application for lack of jurisdiction.

The original decision found that the applicant failed to establish a link between the alleged conduct and a ground under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the applicant did not meet the threshold criteria for reconsideration, as he provided no new determinative facts or evidence, nor did he show that the decision conflicted with established case law or procedure.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

Papouchine v. Staples Canada, 2013 HRTO 821

Human rights application challenging attendance management program dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application challenging the attendance management program at two respondent work sites.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the applicant had standing against William Osler Health Centre and if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found the applicant was employed solely by Carillion Services Inc. and lacked standing against William Osler.

Furthermore, the applicant's theoretical concerns about the attendance program, which had been revised following a union policy grievance settlement, did not raise issues under the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Timothy Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre and Carillion Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 795

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2013

Respondent granted 14 days to file a late response to an application for contravention of settlement.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement under section 45.9 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

David Bailey v. Rock with Us Marble & Granite, 2013 HRTO 783

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2013

Respondent granted 10 days to file a late Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and granted the respondent 10 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Fitzgerald v. Parsons Precast Inc., 2013 HRTO 786

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after parties failed to contact Tribunal following abeyance.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal previously placed the application in abeyance until October 1, 2012, with instructions that it would be dismissed as abandoned if neither party requested to proceed within six months of that date.

As neither party contacted the Tribunal within the specified timeframe, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Raymond Floreani v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, 2013 HRTO 780

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice within the required timeframe.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jane Price v. David Busby Street Centre, 2013 HRTO 779

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against the Superior Court of Justice.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

After the applicant failed to respond to the initial NOID and a subsequent reminder sent to his residence and email, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Salama v. Superior Court of Justice, 2013 HRTO 777

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 8, 2013

Respondent given 14 days to file a response before Tribunal proceeds without notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a response within 14 days, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Smith v. Dixee Lee Chicken, 2325650 Ont. Ltd., 2013 HRTO 767

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 2, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to maintain current contact information.

The applicant filed an Application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was previously deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing Ontario Labour Relations Board proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently attempted to contact the applicant to determine the status of the grievance proceedings, but all correspondence was returned as undeliverable and the applicant's phone number was out of service.

As the applicant failed to update his contact information as required by Rule 1.13, the Tribunal deemed the Application abandoned pursuant to Rule 5.4 and dismissed it.

Smith v. Vannatter Group Inc., 2013 HRTO 742

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 2, 2013

Respondents given 14 days to file a Response or face consequences for failing to participate.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents were granted an extension to file their Response but failed to do so by the extended deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents of the consequences of failing to respond under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents were given 14 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Peyman Heravi v. Homestarts Incorporated, 2013 HRTO 739

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 2, 2013

Human rights application against duty counsel dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in the provision of services on the basis of disability (hearing impairment) against a duty counsel.

The applicant claimed the respondent failed to provide a note-taker or request an adjournment on his behalf in family court.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the application, finding no reasonable prospect of success because providing a note-taker or appearing in court for the applicant were outside the respondent's mandate as duty counsel, and thus no differential treatment occurred.

James Lloy v. Diane Meikle, 2013 HRTO 741

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After the hearing was scheduled, the respondents requested a rescheduling due to counsel's unavailability.

The Tribunal made multiple requests to the applicant to provide alternative dates and confirm his intentions regarding the application.

The applicant failed to respond to any of the Tribunal's correspondence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Bourne v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 732

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Respondents given final 14 days to file a Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the 35 days directed by the Tribunal's previous Interim Decision.

The Tribunal issued this Interim Decision warning the respondents of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and granted them a final 14 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Patricia Vogel v. Caressant Care and Jackie Fraser, 2013 HRTO 729

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Arthur Zeilikman

In Private Practice12 cases2012–2022

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as substance was appropriately dealt with in prior arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability by his employer.

Concurrently, his union filed multiple grievances regarding the same workplace issues, including his eventual termination, which proceeded to arbitration.

The arbitrator issued an award dismissing the grievances and addressing the human rights issues.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal dismiss the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the arbitrator had appropriately dealt with the substance of the applicant's allegations, including the failure to accommodate and termination, and dismissed the application as an abuse of process.

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2013 HRTO 726

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Respondents given 14 days to file a Response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents failed to file a Response by the directed deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and granted them 14 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Sol v. Coles, 2013 HRTO 731

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 25, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to failure to respond to Tribunal notice.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice within the required timeframe.

As a result, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Sheppard v. Metro Ontario Inc., 2013 HRTO 703

Katherine Ferreira

32 cases2013–2025

Anne K. Gallop

3 cases2001–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 23, 2013

Union removed as respondent and added as intervenor on consent in human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The applicant's union filed a request to intervene.

The respondent initially opposed the intervention and named the union as an additional respondent.

Following a case assessment direction and written submissions, the respondent consented to the union participating as an intervenor rather than a respondent.

The Tribunal ordered the union removed as a respondent and added as an intervenor.

Robert McInnis v. Waterloo North Hydro Inc., 2013 HRTO 671

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2013

Respondent given 14 days to file a Response before Tribunal proceeds without their participation.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Nadine Wilson v. Topcliff Community Childcare Centre, 2013 HRTO 664

Bay Ryley

41 cases2005–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 17, 2013

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed; respondent properly withheld tax on retiring allowance.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement, alleging the respondent breached their settlement agreement by withholding 30% of the $20,000 settlement funds to remit to the Receiver General.

The respondent argued the payment was a retiring allowance subject to statutory deductions, as stated in the Minutes of Settlement.

The Tribunal found that the payment was intended to compensate for lost employment income rather than general damages, and was therefore properly characterized as a retiring allowance subject to withholding tax.

The Application was dismissed.

Beverly Axworthy v. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon, 2013 HRTO 638

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 15, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application on the basis that it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Adams v. Brantford (City), 2013 HRTO 615

Page 18 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 18 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Papouchine v. Staples Canada, 2013 HRTO 821

Susan Ballantyne

Dan Shields

Andrew Shaw

Naomi Overend

Timothy Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre and Carillion Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 795

Naomi Overend

David Bailey v. Rock with Us Marble & Granite, 2013 HRTO 783

Naomi Overend

Fitzgerald v. Parsons Precast Inc., 2013 HRTO 786

Naomi Overend

Raymond Floreani v. Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, 2013 HRTO 780

Naomi Overend

Jane Price v. David Busby Street Centre, 2013 HRTO 779

Naomi Overend

Salama v. Superior Court of Justice, 2013 HRTO 777

Naomi Overend

Smith v. Dixee Lee Chicken, 2325650 Ont. Ltd., 2013 HRTO 767

Naomi Overend

Smith v. Vannatter Group Inc., 2013 HRTO 742

Naomi Overend

Peyman Heravi v. Homestarts Incorporated, 2013 HRTO 739

Raj Anand

Naomi Overend

James Lloy v. Diane Meikle, 2013 HRTO 741

Patricia G. Murray

Naomi Overend

Bourne v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 732

Naomi Overend

Patricia Vogel v. Caressant Care and Jackie Fraser, 2013 HRTO 729

Patricia G. Murray

Arthur Zeilikman

Naomi Overend

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2013 HRTO 726

Naomi Overend

Sol v. Coles, 2013 HRTO 731

Naomi Overend

Sheppard v. Metro Ontario Inc., 2013 HRTO 703

Katherine Ferreira

Anne K. Gallop

Naomi Overend

Robert McInnis v. Waterloo North Hydro Inc., 2013 HRTO 671

Naomi Overend

Nadine Wilson v. Topcliff Community Childcare Centre, 2013 HRTO 664

Bay Ryley

Naomi Overend

Beverly Axworthy v. The Corporation of the Town of Caledon, 2013 HRTO 638

Naomi Overend

Adams v. Brantford (City), 2013 HRTO 615

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent