Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 4, 2013

Tribunal directs non-responding personal respondent to file response within 14 days or face consequences.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate respondent and two personal respondents.

While the corporate respondent and one personal respondent filed responses, the other personal respondent failed to do so.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the non-responding personal respondent to file a response within 14 days, warning that failure to comply could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the allegations accepted under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Bryson Hitchcock v. Johnston Motor Sales Co. Limited, 2013 HRTO 1168

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 4, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Huzo v. Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC), 2013 HRTO 1169

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant was granted an extension to respond but failed to do so.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Alex Samuel v. Miller Waste Systems Inc., 2013 HRTO 1153

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to summary hearing request.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent filed a Response and a Request for Summary Hearing.

The applicant failed to file a Reply or a Response to the Request for Summary Hearing, despite being directed to do so by a Case Assessment Direction and receiving assistance from the Tribunal.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

May-Ann Devitt v. Reliance Comfort Limited Partnership, 2013 HRTO 1152

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 17, 2013

Respondent deemed to have accepted allegations and waived participation after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging breach of a settlement agreement.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving notice and a previous 'no response decision' directing it to do so.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings.

The applicant was directed to file further materials to proceed with the determination of the Application.

David Bailey v. Rock with Us Marble & Granite, 2013 HRTO 1077

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 17, 2013

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on disability.

The respondent failed to file a Response within the required time, even after a 'no response decision' was issued directing them to do so.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the application and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings.

The applicant was directed to file further materials to support their claim for damages.

Messina v. International Fence and Railings Inc., 2013 HRTO 1076

Pre-2011 human rights allegations dismissed for delay; waiting for internal investigation does not justify delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by her employer.

The respondent requested to dismiss allegations pre-dating December 11, 2011 for delay, and requested a summary hearing for the remaining surveillance allegation.

The Tribunal dismissed the older allegations, finding no good faith explanation for the delay, as waiting for an internal investigation to conclude does not justify delay.

The request for a summary hearing was denied.

The applicant's request to amend was dismissed without prejudice, and the union's request to intervene was granted.

Hibbert v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 1052

Michelle Mulgrave

18 cases2004–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 12, 2013

Unopposed request to amend human rights application to add further relief granted.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend her human rights application to add requests for monetary damages, policy development, and training.

The respondent did not file a response or oppose the request.

The Tribunal found the proposed amendments reasonable and granted the request, noting no prejudice to the respondent as the hearing was scheduled for a later date.

Shirley Scott v. Hastech Manufacturing, 2013 HRTO 1049

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2013

Request for interim remedy to accommodate disability and transfer workplace denied.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and reprisal.

He requested an interim remedy to be placed in another facility away from an allegedly poisoned environment and to have his disabilities accommodated, noting he had been out of the workplace and without income for several months.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the interim remedy was necessary to ensure a complete, appropriate, and effective remedy at the end of a hearing, as the Tribunal could order a remedy to make him whole if he were ultimately successful.

Johnston v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1011

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to services based on multiple grounds.

The Tribunal previously ordered the applicant to provide further particulars and to copy the respondents on correspondence.

After the applicant failed to provide proof of copying the respondents and failed to respond to a subsequent Tribunal direction warning of potential dismissal, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Vernon Lohan v. Sylvia Verkerk, Peel Regional Police and Jamie Hinton, 2013 HRTO 1005

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing by teleconference to determine whether the application should be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain his absence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Troughton v. YouthSpeak Performance Charity Organization, 2013 HRTO 968

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 30, 2013

Applicant ordered to submit additional documents and advise on hearing format in undefended human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Following a previous interim decision deeming the respondent to have accepted all allegations and waived participation rights, the Tribunal ordered the applicant to submit any additional documents for consideration within three weeks and to advise whether she wishes to make oral submissions.

Sabrina Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Hortons Store No. 2533, 2013 HRTO 961

Lisa Riegel

3 cases2013–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 30, 2013

Adjournment of summary hearing granted due to applicant's unanticipated family emergency.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing due to an unanticipated family emergency requiring her to travel to the United States.

The respondents opposed the adjournment unless it could be rescheduled within two weeks.

The Tribunal found the circumstances constituted an exceptional circumstance under its Practice Direction and granted the adjournment.

Sonia Chisholm v. Frank Scarpitti, Alan Ho and Jack Heath, 2013 HRTO 959

Sharlene Ziniuk

8 cases2011–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 22, 2013

Human rights application against Family Responsibility Office dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and marital status by the Family Responsibility Office in its enforcement of a support order.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Finding that the applicant could not establish a nexus between the respondent's alleged failure to communicate and a protected ground under the Code, the Tribunal dismissed the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Lloy v. Ontario (Family Responsibility Office), 2013 HRTO 882

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 21, 2013

Request for reconsideration of remedial order dismissed as applicant attempted to introduce new evidence and arguments.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that found the respondent had contravened a settlement agreement.

The applicant argued the remedial order was insufficient based on information from mediation and subsequent incidents.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that reconsideration is not an appeal or an opportunity to repair deficiencies in a case, and that information from mediation or new allegations not properly before the Tribunal could not be considered.

Ali Reza Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2013 HRTO 875

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant failed to explain delay or failure to respond to notice.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned.

The original application was dismissed because the applicant failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding the apparent delay in filing.

In his reconsideration request, the applicant did not provide any reasons for his failure to respond or for the delay, but instead focused on the merits of his allegations.

The Tribunal found no basis under Rule 26.5 to exercise its discretion to reconsider the decision and dismissed the request.

Toth v. Express Personnel, 2013 HRTO 861

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Reconsideration granted where applicant missed summary hearing due to incarceration.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application for abandonment after he failed to attend a summary hearing teleconference.

The applicant submitted that he was incarcerated at the time of the teleconference and did not receive notice.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal exercised its discretion to allow the reconsideration, finding that the applicant did not receive notice through no fault of his own, and ordered a new summary hearing teleconference to be scheduled.

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2013 HRTO 859

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2013

Respondent given 10 days to file a Response before Tribunal proceeds without further notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 10 days, warning that failure to do so could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Altivo Heber Moraes Messina v. International Fence and Railings Inc., 2013 HRTO 828

Wade Poziomka

55 cases2011–2017

Michael MacLellan

10 cases2011–2026

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2013

Respondents' preliminary requests to dismiss human rights application and remove individual respondent denied.

The respondents brought multiple requests for orders, including requests to dismiss the application for no reasonable prospect of success, no prima facie case, abuse of process, and delay.

The respondents also sought to remove the individual respondent, defer the application pending a Ministry of Labour investigation, and obtain early production of documents.

The Tribunal denied all of the respondents' requests, finding that the application disclosed a prima facie case of discrimination based on pregnancy and disability, the allegations were not clearly out of time, and the individual respondent's conduct was a central issue.

The request for early document production was denied as premature.

Amanda Fernando v. M.G.R. Contracting and Maintenance Ltd. and Graziano Roti, 2013 HRTO 836

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2013

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing application for delay dismissed.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application against the Barrie Police Services Board on the basis of delay.

The applicant argued there were new facts and ongoing discriminatory events within the one-year time limit.

The Tribunal found the applicant's new theory was an attempt to repair deficiencies in his case and that the allegedly new information was not relevant to the issue of delay.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Melo v. Barrie Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 820

Page 17 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 17 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Bryson Hitchcock v. Johnston Motor Sales Co. Limited, 2013 HRTO 1168

Naomi Overend

Huzo v. Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC), 2013 HRTO 1169

Naomi Overend

Alex Samuel v. Miller Waste Systems Inc., 2013 HRTO 1153

Naomi Overend

May-Ann Devitt v. Reliance Comfort Limited Partnership, 2013 HRTO 1152

Naomi Overend

David Bailey v. Rock with Us Marble & Granite, 2013 HRTO 1077

Naomi Overend

Messina v. International Fence and Railings Inc., 2013 HRTO 1076

Lucy Siraco

J. David Watson

Devon Paul

Naomi Overend

Hibbert v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 1052

Michelle Mulgrave

Naomi Overend

Shirley Scott v. Hastech Manufacturing, 2013 HRTO 1049

Naomi Overend

Johnston v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1011

Naomi Overend

Vernon Lohan v. Sylvia Verkerk, Peel Regional Police and Jamie Hinton, 2013 HRTO 1005

Naomi Overend

Troughton v. YouthSpeak Performance Charity Organization, 2013 HRTO 968

Naomi Overend

Sabrina Rollick v. 1526597 Ontario Inc. o/a Tim Hortons Store No. 2533, 2013 HRTO 961

Lisa Riegel

Naomi Overend

Sonia Chisholm v. Frank Scarpitti, Alan Ho and Jack Heath, 2013 HRTO 959

Sharlene Ziniuk

Naomi Overend

Lloy v. Ontario (Family Responsibility Office), 2013 HRTO 882

Naomi Overend

Ali Reza Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2013 HRTO 875

Naomi Overend

Toth v. Express Personnel, 2013 HRTO 861

Naomi Overend

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2013 HRTO 859

Naomi Overend

Altivo Heber Moraes Messina v. International Fence and Railings Inc., 2013 HRTO 828

Wade Poziomka

Michael MacLellan

Naomi Overend

Amanda Fernando v. M.G.R. Contracting and Maintenance Ltd. and Graziano Roti, 2013 HRTO 836

Naomi Overend

Melo v. Barrie Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 820

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent

for Pizza Nova

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale