Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Summary hearing request to dismiss human rights application for no reasonable prospect of success denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of reprisal.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that, based on the applicant's representations concerning the evidence she intended to call, it could not conclude at this stage that she had no reasonable prospect of establishing a link between the incidents described and the ground of reprisal.

The Tribunal ordered the matter to proceed to a one-day hearing where the applicant would be required to call her case.

Veronique Susan Nyonzima v. Idlewyld Manor, 2012 HRTO 2409

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 21, 2012

Human rights application against WSIB dismissed summarily as it merely alleged incorrect benefit decisions.

The applicant alleged that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board discriminated against him on the basis of disability by failing to recognize the severe extent of his disabilities and denying him benefits.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Applying established case law, the Tribunal found that an allegation that a statutory benefit provider misapplied its rules or misinterpreted medical documentation does not amount to a Code violation.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Mariam Tadese v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 2383

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 17, 2012

Respondent granted 14 days to file a Response after failing to comply with previous deadline.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and reprisal.

In a previous interim decision, the Tribunal directed the respondent to file a Response within 35 days.

The respondent failed to do so.

The Tribunal issued this interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to respond under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and provided the respondent with 14 days to file a Response and explain the delay.

Patranie Fagu v. Carillion Services Inc., 2012 HRTO 2357

Frank Angeletti

25 cases1991–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 17, 2012

Unopposed request to amend human rights application to include recent events granted.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to amend her Application to include events taking place in November 2012, including her resignation.

The respondents did not oppose the amendment.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding no prejudice and noting it would be expeditious to proceed with all allegations concerning the applicant's employment.

Katherine Sisco v. Dale Brain Injury Services and Neil Hopson, 2012 HRTO 2356

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 17, 2012

Respondents given final 14 days to file a Response before Tribunal proceeds without them.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Following a prior interim decision directing the respondents to file a Response, the respondents failed to do so.

The Tribunal issued this interim decision warning the respondents that failure to file a Response within 14 days could result in the Tribunal proceeding without them, deeming them to have accepted the allegations, and deciding the matter based only on the material before it.

Ha Phuoc On v. Amore Food Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 2351

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 14, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code but failed to attend a scheduled mediation session.

The Tribunal sent multiple letters and emails directing the applicant to advise of her intentions, warning that failure to respond could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Dayna Bouchey v. Multigen Healthcare Corporation and Nazaar Moussa, 2012 HRTO 2347

Evan Van Dyck

1 case2012–2012

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 13, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as applicant failed to link supervisors' disrespectful treatment to prohibited grounds.

The applicant, a black male of Caribbean origin, alleged that his supervisors discriminated against him based on race, colour, place of origin, and ethnic origin by speaking to him in a demeaning and disrespectful manner on two occasions.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario found that while the supervisors may have been abrupt or disrespectful, the applicant failed to provide direct or circumstantial evidence linking the treatment to a prohibited ground under the Human Rights Code.

The application was dismissed.

McNee v. Coca Cola Bottling Company, 2012 HRTO 2339

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 12, 2012

Respondent granted 14 days to file a Response to human rights application after missing deadline.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set out in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal granted the respondent 14 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Khan v. Spherion Staffing, 2012 HRTO 2329

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 11, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application but subsequently lost contact with the Tribunal and his alternate contact address.

After failing to respond to a Case Assessment Direction warning that the application might be dismissed as abandoned, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Justin Klein v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community and Social Services – Ontario Disability Support Program, 2012 CanLII 79040

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing by teleconference to determine whether the application should be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the teleconference and did not communicate with the Tribunal to explain the absence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2012 HRTO 2259

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 14, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to provide submissions or confirm his intentions to continue the application.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

John Pierce v. Sonoco Canada Corp. Trent Valley Mill, 2012 HRTO 2145

Roy C. Fillion

1 case2012–2012

Richard Miller

43 cases2005–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 30, 2012

Individual respondents removed on consent; partial document production ordered subject to confidentiality conditions.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested an order to remove the named individual respondents and to require the respondent school board to produce certain classes of documents.

The Tribunal granted the request to remove the individual respondents on consent.

The Tribunal ordered the production of some documents relating to the performance and promotion of other Vice Principals subject to strict confidentiality conditions, but denied other production requests as premature or irrelevant to the current phase of the bifurcated hearing.

Khatkur v. Peel District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2074

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 26, 2012

Respondent given 14 days to file a Response to human rights application or face default proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to the respondent.

D.T. v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services), 2012 HRTO 2047

Jessica Young

8 cases2012–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2012

Human rights application reactivated to schedule a hearing on whether grievance arbitration appropriately dealt with the substance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment, which was previously deferred pending the outcome of a grievance arbitration.

The respondents filed a request to dismiss the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the grievance arbitration appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal reactivated the application and ordered a half-day teleconference hearing to determine the section 45.1 dismissal request.

Hillier v. Benteler Automotive Canada Corp., 2012 HRTO 2038

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to respond to the respondent's requests within 14 days, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Michael Legvari v. Peter Hutchinson, 2012 HRTO 2041

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2012

Personal respondent granted 14 days to file late response to human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against a corporate and a personal respondent.

The corporate respondent filed a response, but the personal respondent failed to do so by the deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the personal respondent to file a response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, warning that failure to do so could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice to her under Rule 5.5.

Amr Amer v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc. and Rosemary Riina, 2012 HRTO 2042

Paul O’Ryan

24 cases2010–2018

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2012

Summary hearing dismisses disability discrimination claims against union but allows reprisal allegations to proceed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging her union discriminated against her on the basis of disability and reprisal in its handling of her grievance following her termination.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations regarding the union's failure to advance human rights concerns and failure to accommodate her mental state, finding no link to a Code ground and no basis for a failure to accommodate.

However, the Tribunal allowed the applicant's allegations of reprisal to proceed to a hearing, as she alleged the union threatened reprisal when she advised them she wished to file a human rights application.

Pryse v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2012 HRTO 2032

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2012

Respondent given 14 days to file a Response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed an Application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Rules of Procedure, and granted the respondent 14 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Sylvain Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc., 2012 HRTO 2037

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional direction.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to employment because of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction requiring the applicant to provide submissions on whether the matter fell within exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Kevan Carroll v. CAW, Local 444, 2012 HRTO 2022

Ryan Goldvine

17 cases2011–2012

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Arthur Zeilikman

In Private Practice12 cases2012–2022

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2012

Human rights allegations dismissed under s. 45.1; applicant directed to file formal request to amend application.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance of the allegations had been appropriately dealt with in a grievance arbitration.

The applicant conceded this point, and the Tribunal dismissed the existing allegations.

However, the applicant indicated an intention to amend his application to include subsequent events leading to his termination.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a formal Request for an Order During Proceedings to set out the proposed amendments, failing which the application would be dismissed in its entirety.

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2027

Page 21 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 21 of 49 (975 cases)

Jane M. Gooding

Francois Sauvageau

Naomi Overend

Veronique Susan Nyonzima v. Idlewyld Manor, 2012 HRTO 2409

Naomi Overend

Mariam Tadese v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2012 HRTO 2383

Naomi Overend

Patranie Fagu v. Carillion Services Inc., 2012 HRTO 2357

Frank Angeletti

Naomi Overend

Katherine Sisco v. Dale Brain Injury Services and Neil Hopson, 2012 HRTO 2356

Naomi Overend

Ha Phuoc On v. Amore Food Group Inc., 2012 HRTO 2351

Naomi Overend

Dayna Bouchey v. Multigen Healthcare Corporation and Nazaar Moussa, 2012 HRTO 2347

Evan Van Dyck

Naomi Overend

McNee v. Coca Cola Bottling Company, 2012 HRTO 2339

Naomi Overend

Khan v. Spherion Staffing, 2012 HRTO 2329

Naomi Overend

Justin Klein v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community and Social Services – Ontario Disability Support Program, 2012 CanLII 79040

Naomi Overend

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2012 HRTO 2259

Naomi Overend

John Pierce v. Sonoco Canada Corp. Trent Valley Mill, 2012 HRTO 2145

Roy C. Fillion

Richard Miller

Naomi Overend

Khatkur v. Peel District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2074

Naomi Overend

D.T. v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services), 2012 HRTO 2047

Jessica Young

Naomi Overend

Hillier v. Benteler Automotive Canada Corp., 2012 HRTO 2038

Naomi Overend

Michael Legvari v. Peter Hutchinson, 2012 HRTO 2041

Naomi Overend

Amr Amer v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc. and Rosemary Riina, 2012 HRTO 2042

Paul O’Ryan

Naomi Overend

Pryse v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2012 HRTO 2032

Naomi Overend

Sylvain Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc., 2012 HRTO 2037

Naomi Overend

Kevan Carroll v. CAW, Local 444, 2012 HRTO 2022

Ryan Goldvine

Patricia G. Murray

Arthur Zeilikman

Naomi Overend

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 2027

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society