The complainant, a former restaurant server, alleged sexual harassment, sexual solicitation, and reprisal by the restaurant owner during and after her brief employment.
The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support most of the allegations, including claims of inappropriate conduct during her employment, a sexual advance, and ongoing harassment in the neighbourhood.
However, the Tribunal found that a single, highly explicit and vulgar sexual remark made by the owner when the complainant picked up her final pay constituted discrimination with respect to employment under section 5 of the Human Rights Code.
The Tribunal awarded $1,000 in general damages for the single breach.