Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Christine Lundy, Anne Marsden, Kate Hughes.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Respondent's request to add third party as respondent denied over applicant's objections.

The respondent employer filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to add Goldcorp Canada Ltd. as a respondent to the human rights application.

The applicant, who alleged failure to accommodate her mould allergy, opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the request, holding that it is up to the applicant to determine the respondents against whom she wishes to proceed, and she had made no allegations against Goldcorp.

Mary Caldwell v. Windigo Catering Limited Partnership, 2016 HRTO 367

Jordan Lester

9 cases2013–2021

Chantelle Bryson

10 cases2015–2026

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2016

Applicant ordered to produce medical and employment records arguably relevant to accommodation and mitigation.

The respondent requested the production of the applicant's medical and employment records in a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The applicant opposed the request as untimely.

The Tribunal found the request was not premature as the deadline for disclosure of arguably relevant documents had passed.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to produce the requested documents, finding them arguably relevant to the issues of accommodation, mitigation, and remedy.

Caldwell v. Windigo Catering Limited Partnership, 2016 HRTO 324

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 3, 2016

Tribunal issues directions regarding CCAA stay and service on personal respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application against her former employer and a personal respondent.

The corporate respondent subsequently underwent restructuring under the CCAA, resulting in a court-approved plan of compromise.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the applicant to advise whether she intends to seek leave to file a proof of claim against the corporate respondent.

The Tribunal also ordered the corporate respondent to confirm whether it forwarded the application to the personal respondent and to provide his last known personal address.

Carrol v. Laura Canada, 2016 HRTO 284

James Renaud

9 cases1987–2025

Brian Nolan

3 cases1986–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 3, 2016

Deferred human rights application re-activated after grievance withdrawal; timeliness objection dismissed as deadline fell on weekend.

The applicant requested to re-activate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending a union grievance process that was ultimately withdrawn.

The respondents opposed the re-activation due to the passage of time and requested the application be dismissed as untimely.

The Tribunal granted the request to re-activate, finding no authority to deny it despite concerns about the ten-year delay.

The Tribunal also denied the request to dismiss the application as untimely, noting that the one-year filing deadline fell on a Saturday, and the application was properly filed on the following Monday.

Linda De Rose v. Windsor-Essex Catholic District School Board and Jim Minello, 2016 HRTO 280

Lucy Siraco

28 cases2009–2016

Dean Ardron

13 cases2011–2021

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 29, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned and an abuse of process after applicant failed to attend hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding overtime opportunities.

After a lengthy procedural history involving the applicant's failure to provide particulars and disregard for Tribunal orders, the applicant failed to attend the scheduled merits hearing, sending a fax the morning of the hearing claiming bias.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and as an abuse of process, noting the applicant's failure to request time off work indicated he never intended to attend.

Donald Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 268

Maria Kotsopoulos

In Private Practice17 cases2009–2024

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2016

Human rights application partially dismissed; sex and sexual orientation claims proceed to merits hearing.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the applicant's human rights application alleging discrimination on multiple grounds.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to events from 1999/2000 as untimely, finding no reasonable explanation for the 15-year delay.

The Tribunal also dismissed the allegations of discrimination based on disability, age, gender identity, and gender expression for having no reasonable prospect of success.

However, the Tribunal allowed the allegations of discrimination based on sex and sexual orientation to proceed to a full hearing, finding the applicant had alleged sufficient facts to establish a potential link to the respondent's denial of her 2015 application.

Hilary Cutler v. Hi-Mark Occupational Skills Training Centre Ltd., 2016 HRTO 244

Mélissa Lacroix

5 cases2012–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2016

Request for contact information of classmates denied as Code does not cover discrimination by classmates.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to compel the organizational respondent to disclose the contact information of four former classmates so they could be added as respondents to his human rights application.

The Tribunal denied the request and removed the classmates as respondents, finding that the Human Rights Code does not cover allegations of discrimination or harassment against fellow classmates.

Fenkam v. Le Collège La Cité, 2016 HRTO 245

Christian Vernon

18 cases2010–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2016

Interim decision on proper respondents annulled on reconsideration due to res judicata.

The adjudicator reconsidered and annulled a previous interim decision that had added and removed respondents to the application.

The adjudicator noted that a different Vice Chair had already addressed the issue of the proper respondents in a prior interim decision, making the matter res judicata.

The sole respondent to the application remains Metro Ontario Inc.

John Timmins v. Metro Ontario Inc. and Kim Coughlin, 2016 HRTO 219

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2016

Request to reactivate human rights application granted; summary hearing scheduled to consider dismissal.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the outcome of an appeal to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The applicant withdrew the OLRB appeal.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application but ordered a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed on the basis of adjudicative immunity or having no reasonable prospect of success.

Zoran Backovic v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Labour and Sinem Askin, 2016 HRTO 222

Christian Vernon

18 cases2010–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2016

Request to add supervisor as personal respondent granted; request to remove two other personal respondents granted.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to add his supervisor as a personal respondent to his human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and creed.

The respondents filed a request to remove two other personal respondents, the Vice President of Human Resources and the Store Manager.

The Tribunal applied the Smyth and Persaud factors, granting the request to add the supervisor because the employer might not be vicariously liable for harassment under section 46.3 of the Code.

The Tribunal also granted the request to remove the other two personal respondents as there were no specific allegations capable of supporting a personal remedy against them.

Timmins v. Metro Ontario Inc., 2016 HRTO 207

Lucy Siraco

28 cases2009–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 12, 2016

Tribunal orders applicant to provide particulars of alleged meetings and comply with documentary disclosure rules.

In an interim decision regarding a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in the denial of overtime, the respondent requested production of documents, particulars, and the striking of portions of the applicant's witness statement.

The Tribunal denied the request for the applicant's outside income records but ordered the applicant to provide particulars regarding alleged meetings about overtime.

The Tribunal also struck portions of the witness statement relating to events outside the temporal scope of the application and ordered the applicant to comply with documentary disclosure rules.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 200

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2016

Reconsideration denied; request to add respondent was an attempt to circumvent limitation periods.

The applicant sought reconsideration of an Interim Decision that denied her request to add York University as a respondent to her human rights application.

The applicant alleged discrimination and reprisal by her mentor teacher and the school board during a student placement.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's request to add York University was an attempt to raise new, untimely allegations outside the one-year limitation period under s. 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The request for reconsideration was denied as the applicant failed to provide new determinative facts or evidence to justify altering the Interim Decision.

Yvonne Sookdeo v. Toronto District School Board and Karen Cannata, 2016 HRTO 197

Antoni Casalinuovo

12 cases2014–2026

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 11, 2016

Tribunal grants pre-hearing withdrawal of human rights application without terms, refusing respondents' request for prejudice.

The applicant sought to withdraw her human rights application prior to a scheduled mediation.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal order the withdrawal to be 'with prejudice' to prevent the applicant from relitigating the substance of the application in the future, relying on a previous Tribunal decision.

The Tribunal declined the respondents' request, noting its consistent approach of refusing to impose terms on pre-hearing withdrawals.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to withdraw the application without terms.

Jean Lewis v. Ontario Condominium Corporation No. 14 and Linda Watt, 2016 HRTO 196

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 10, 2016

Request to add six personal respondents to human rights application denied for lack of compelling reason.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to add six individuals as personal respondents to her human rights application alleging sex discrimination and reprisal.

The Tribunal applied the Smyth and Persaud factors and found no compelling reason to add the individuals, as there were no allegations supporting personal liability or remedies against them outside their employment duties.

The request to add respondents was denied, and the Monitor for the corporate respondent was directed to provide an update on a court-ordered stay of proceedings.

Carrol v. Laura Canada, 2016 HRTO 187

Julie O’Donnell

16 cases2000–2022

Brandin O’Connor

16 cases2014–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 9, 2016

Tribunal orders partial production of medical records, denying requests for documents regarding previous employer conflicts.

The respondent in a human rights application brought a motion for the production of various documents, including the applicant's medical records relating to conflicts with previous employers, previous settlement documents, and clinical notes from her treating practitioners.

The Tribunal applied the 'arguable relevance' test and balanced it against the applicant's privacy interests.

The Tribunal denied the requests for medical records regarding previous employer conflicts and previous settlement documents, finding them not arguably relevant and overly intrusive.

The Tribunal ordered the production of specific clinical notes from the relevant time period and the curriculum vitae of a practitioner expected to provide opinion evidence.

McDonald v. CAA South Central Ontario, 2016 HRTO 186

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 9, 2016

Request to add corporate respondent and amend remedy granted; request to add General Manager denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability when her employment was terminated.

She brought a Request for Order During Proceedings to add her corporate employer and its General Manager as respondents, and to amend the remedy sought.

The Tribunal granted the request to add the corporate employer, as the allegations could support a finding of discrimination against it.

The request to add the General Manager was denied, as he was acting within the scope of his duties and there was no compelling reason to name him personally.

The request to amend the remedy was granted, as the proceeding was at an early stage and there was no prejudice to the respondents.

Godin v. 4036464 Canada Inc., 2016 HRTO 181

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 9, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period under section 34(1)(a) of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Michel v. Trillium Health Partners, 2016 HRTO 182

William Anderson

5 cases2000–2016

Michele Brady

19 cases2013–2025

Marnie Corbold

17 cases1999–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 3, 2016

Request to re-activate deferred human rights application granted despite short delay by applicant's non-legal representative.

The applicant requested to re-activate her deferred human rights application after the conclusion of another legal proceeding.

The request was filed past the 60-day time limit set out in the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents opposed the re-activation due to the delay.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's representative, a counsellor with no legal training, provided a reasonable explanation for the short delay.

Finding no significant prejudice to the respondents, the Tribunal granted the request to re-activate the application and directed the remaining respondents to file their responses.

Natasha Choli v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2016 HRTO 155

Scott Williams

13 cases1994–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 3, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as hospital did not actually deny psychiatric services to the applicant.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of race and place of origin, claiming she was denied psychiatric services because a hospital psychiatrist was only accepting Cantonese and Mandarin speaking patients.

The Tribunal found that while a nurse initially miscommunicated that the psychiatrist was only seeing Cantonese and Mandarin speakers, the psychiatrist did in fact agree to see the applicant for a reassessment and attempted to schedule an appointment.

As there was no actual denial of services, the application was dismissed.

Borba v. North York General Hospital, 2016 HRTO 160

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2016

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving a Notice of Application and a subsequent direction from the Tribunal warning of the consequences of failing to respond.

Applying Rule 5.5 of its Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings.

A case management conference call was scheduled to determine the next steps for adjudicating the Application.

Kevin Thompson v. Michele’s Italian Ristorante, 2016 HRTO 157

Page 12 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alex HenrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brandon DurantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christian FenkamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hala MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance
Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Patricia MurrayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
David SpearsCounsel
1 appearance
Dean AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas SulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Drago BanjavcicAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 12 of 39 (761 cases)