Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Christine Lundy, Anne Marsden, Kate Hughes.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Vice-chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Vice-chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Douglas Sulman

1 case2016–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2016

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent trucking company is federally regulated.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by his former employer, a trucking company.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the employer appeared to be a federally-regulated undertaking.

The respondents confirmed they engage in interprovincial and international transportation, which the applicant did not dispute.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, as interprovincial transportation falls under exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The respondents' request for legal costs was also denied, as the Tribunal lacks the power to award costs.

Jefferson v. D Copley and Son Transport Ltd., 2016 HRTO 152

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 1, 2016

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as concurrent civil claim remains ongoing.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of his concurrent civil claim against the respondent.

The applicant argued that the application should be reactivated due to a lack of movement in the civil claim.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding it inappropriate to reactivate the application while the civil claim, which relates to the same facts, remains ongoing.

The application remains deferred.

Lanis v. MaxIT Healthcare Inc., 2016 HRTO 144

Sydney Hagler

1 case2016–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 1, 2016

Tribunal grants applicant's unopposed request to amend the remedy sought to $486,585.00.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested an order to amend the remedy sought in her application to $486,585.00.

The respondent did not respond to the request.

The Tribunal granted the amendment without prejudice to the respondent's position on the appropriateness of the remedy.

The Tribunal also issued directions regarding pre-hearing disclosure deadlines under Rules 16 and 17 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and directed the intervenor union to advise the Tribunal of the scope of intervention rights it seeks.

Faulkner v. Lakeridge Health, 2016 HRTO 143

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 29, 2016

Second request for reconsideration of interim decisions denied; applicant ordered to file specific hearing documents.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous decision that had denied his request to reconsider two interim decisions.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that interim decisions are not final decisions subject to reconsideration under Rule 26.1, and the applicant provided no new information to warrant reconsideration.

The Tribunal also directed the applicant to specifically identify and file the documents he intends to rely upon at the upcoming hearing, rather than relying on a blanket statement covering all previously filed documents.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 131

Anna Vannelli

9 cases1993–2018

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2016

Reactivation of deferred human rights application granted as timely, but preliminary hearing ordered regarding prior settlement.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application alleging creed discrimination, which had been deferred pending a union grievance.

The respondents opposed the request, arguing it was untimely and barred by a grievance settlement.

The Tribunal granted the reactivation request, finding it was filed within the 60-day time limit under the Rules of Procedure.

However, the Tribunal directed that a preliminary hearing be scheduled to determine whether the application should be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code or as an abuse of process due to the settlement.

Larocque v. Mitra, 2016 HRTO 97

Lee Lenkinski

Licence Surrendered - Administrative Surrender of Licence11 cases2013–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2016

Request to defer human rights application pending professional college complaints denied due to statutory privilege.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging race and colour discrimination by the respondents regarding comments made and a report to the Children's Aid Society when she sought early discharge of her newborns.

The respondents requested the Tribunal defer or dismiss the application pending the outcome of the applicant's complaints to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and the Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the legal issues are distinct and that section 36(3) of the Regulated Health Professions Act creates an absolute statutory privilege preventing the admission of college proceeding records in civil proceedings, meaning the college outcomes could have no impact on the Tribunal application.

C.K. v. William Osler Health System, 2016 HRTO 98

Jocelyn Duquette

Practising Law - Employed13 cases2014–2018

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2016

Human rights application against bank dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as banking is federally regulated.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in services by an employee of TD Bank.

The respondent argued the application should be dismissed as banking falls under federal jurisdiction.

The applicant requested the Tribunal defer the application pending a determination by the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

The Tribunal declined to defer and dismissed the application, finding that the provision of banking services clearly falls under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 91(15) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Raymond Kuate Konga v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2016 HRTO 99

David Patacairk

51 cases2009–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 21, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending the outcome of concurrent criminal proceedings against the claimant.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and creed during his brother's arrest and questioning by the respondents.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the outcome of concurrent criminal proceedings against the claimant.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed given the factual overlap and the potential for conflicting findings.

Bouragba v. Ottawa Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 100

Carole Jenkins

37 cases2001–2021

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 20, 2016

Request to dismiss denied; prior CFSRB settlement did not address human rights discrimination allegations.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a prior settlement before the Child and Family Services Review Board (CFSRB) appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the CFSRB's authority under s. 68.1 of the Child and Family Services Act is limited to procedural matters and does not extend to hearing or remedying Code violations.

Therefore, the prior settlement did not appropriately deal with the substance of the discrimination allegations.

C.K. v. Peel Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 92

Landon Young

13 cases2000–2020

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2016

Human rights application deferred pending related grievance arbitration; request to expedite proceedings denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and sex, as well as workplace harassment.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the outcome of a related grievance arbitration proceeding that raised the same allegations.

The applicant opposed the deferral and filed a Request to Expedite Proceedings, citing concerns that a potential witness was moving abroad.

The Tribunal granted the deferral request to avoid inconsistent decisions and denied the request to expedite, noting the applicant's failure to file required declarations and finding that the witness's relocation did not justify an expedited hearing.

Constantine Bassis v. Commissionaires Great Lakes, 2016 HRTO 78

Wendy Bird

1 case2016–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2016

Human rights application against legal clinic dismissed for delay and lack of reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by a legal clinic on the basis of disability and receipt of public assistance.

The allegations related to the clinic's representation of her between 2011 and 2013, and its subsequent refusal to represent her in 2014.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and dismissed the 2011-2013 allegations as untimely, finding they did not form a series of incidents with the 2014 refusal.

The Tribunal also dismissed the 2014 allegations, concluding there was no reasonable prospect the applicant could establish a link between the denial of services and her disability or receipt of public assistance.

Jubenville v. Algoma Community Legal Clinic Inc., 2016 HRTO 82

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 18, 2016

Reconsideration of interim decisions denied; applicant ordered to comply with pre-hearing disclosure rules.

The applicant requested reconsideration of two interim decisions regarding production orders and hearing transcripts.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the interim decisions were not final decisions and therefore could not be the subject of a reconsideration request.

The Tribunal also directed the self-represented applicant to comply with pre-hearing disclosure obligations under Rules 16 and 17 within 7 days, warning that failure to do so would limit his ability to rely on documents or provide testimony at the hearing.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 73

Motions to amend application, add respondent, and remove personal respondent denied in human rights proceeding.

The applicant sought to amend her human rights application to add new allegations regarding a prior student placement and to add York University as a respondent.

The respondents opposed these requests and sought to remove the personal respondent from the proceeding.

The Tribunal denied the applicant's requests, finding that the proposed new allegations were untimely under s. 34(1) of the Human Rights Code and did not form part of a series of incidents with the original allegations.

The Tribunal also denied the respondents' request to remove the personal respondent, as her conduct was a central issue in the case.

Sookdeo v. Toronto District School Board, 2016 HRTO 33

Robert Dowhan

6 cases2010–2016

K.C. Wysynski

11 cases2014–2018

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2016

Human rights application dismissed in its entirety at the applicant's request.

The applicant filed Requests for Order During Proceedings (RFOP) seeking to dismiss her human rights application against the respondent condominium corporation and property management company.

The respondents agreed to the dismissal but requested that the applicant be declared a vexatious litigant to prevent future re-litigation.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to dismiss the application in its entirety, noting that this dismissal effectively prevents the applicant from re-litigating the substance of the application in the future.

The scheduled hearing was cancelled.

Anne Marsden v. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41 and The Active Group, 2016 HRTO 2

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2015

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant failed to establish criteria under Rule 26.5.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing his human rights application as untimely.

The original decision found that the last incident of alleged discrimination occurred more than a year before the application was filed and that the applicant failed to provide a good faith reason for the delay.

The applicant submitted medical notes and letters in support of his reconsideration request but provided no written submissions.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the materials did not alter the conclusions regarding untimeliness or provide a reasonable explanation for the delay, and thus the applicant failed to meet the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Ahmed Idle v. Mevotech Inc., 2015 HRTO 1749

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 29, 2015

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination based on race, ethnic origin, and age under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the resolution of a related grievance.

After the Tribunal sent multiple letters inquiring about the status of the other proceeding and warning of potential dismissal, the applicant failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Maouad v. Bertrand, 2015 HRTO 1732

Lucy Siraco

28 cases2009–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 23, 2015

Request for digital recording of hearing and unredacted documents denied.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking a digital recording of an upcoming hearing and commenting on redactions made by the respondent to disclosed documents.

The Tribunal denied the request for a recording, noting its standard practice is not to record hearings and the applicant provided no reason to deviate.

The Tribunal also found that the redacted names and badge numbers of other operators were not relevant to the proceeding at this stage, as the applicant had not yet provided particulars regarding his own overtime requests.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2015 HRTO 1726

Scott Williams

13 cases1994–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 18, 2015

Tribunal strikes CPSO letter and ICRC decision from record under s. 36(3) of the RHPA.

The respondent hospital requested an interim order to strike a letter submitted by a doctor to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) and a related Inquiries Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) decision from the Tribunal's record.

The applicant did not respond to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that section 36(3) of the Regulated Health Professions Act (RHPA) contains a blanket prohibition on the use of documents created for or decisions made in an RHPA proceeding in other civil proceedings.

Consequently, the documents and any related oral testimony were struck from the record.

Borba v. North York General Hospital, 2015 HRTO 1709

Misha Wilson

1 case2015–2015

Elichai Shaffir

25 cases2010–2021

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 17, 2015

Tribunal dismisses several discrimination allegations but allows post-settlement work assignment and union accommodation claims to proceed.

The applicants filed human rights applications alleging discrimination based on disability against the employer and the union.

Following a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal dismissed several allegations for lack of jurisdiction, as they related to the Employment Standards Act and the collective agreement.

The Tribunal also dismissed several other allegations for having no reasonable prospect of success, finding no evidence linking the alleged unfair treatment to the applicant's disability.

However, the Tribunal allowed two allegations to proceed to a full hearing: that the employer assigned work exceeding the applicant's disability-related restrictions after a previous settlement, and that the union failed to accommodate the applicant's cognitive disability by refusing to allow his brother to act as his support person.

Requests to defer or consolidate the applications were denied.

Bonnici v. Loblaws Inc., 2015 HRTO 1701

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 11, 2015

Request for reconsideration of pregnancy discrimination decision dismissed as no new determinative evidence was provided.

The personal respondent sought reconsideration of a decision finding that the respondents discriminated against the applicant on the basis of sex by terminating her employment due to her pregnancy.

The respondent argued that the decision did not recognize their evidence.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding that the respondent did not raise any new facts or evidence that could potentially be determinative of the case, but merely disagreed with the Tribunal's weighing of the evidence and credibility findings.

Angeles Toledo v. Mexitaco, 2015 HRTO 1672

Page 13 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alex HenrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brandon DurantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christian FenkamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hala MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance
Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Patricia MurrayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
David SpearsCounsel
1 appearance
Dean AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas SulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Drago BanjavcicAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 13 of 39 (761 cases)

Douglas Sulman

Jo-Anne Pickel

Jefferson v. D Copley and Son Transport Ltd., 2016 HRTO 152

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lanis v. MaxIT Healthcare Inc., 2016 HRTO 144

Sydney Hagler

Jo-Anne Pickel

Faulkner v. Lakeridge Health, 2016 HRTO 143

Jo-Anne Pickel

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 131

Anna Vannelli

Jo-Anne Pickel

Larocque v. Mitra, 2016 HRTO 97

Lee Lenkinski

Jo-Anne Pickel

C.K. v. William Osler Health System, 2016 HRTO 98

Jocelyn Duquette

Jo-Anne Pickel

Raymond Kuate Konga v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank, 2016 HRTO 99

David Patacairk

Jo-Anne Pickel

Bouragba v. Ottawa Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 100

Carole Jenkins

Jo-Anne Pickel

C.K. v. Peel Children’s Aid Society, 2016 HRTO 92

Landon Young

Jo-Anne Pickel

Constantine Bassis v. Commissionaires Great Lakes, 2016 HRTO 78

Wendy Bird

Jo-Anne Pickel

Jubenville v. Algoma Community Legal Clinic Inc., 2016 HRTO 82

Jo-Anne Pickel

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2016 HRTO 73

Joanna Rainbow

Avneet Grewal

Jo-Anne Pickel

Sookdeo v. Toronto District School Board, 2016 HRTO 33

Robert Dowhan

K.C. Wysynski

Jo-Anne Pickel

Anne Marsden v. Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41 and The Active Group, 2016 HRTO 2

Jo-Anne Pickel

Ahmed Idle v. Mevotech Inc., 2015 HRTO 1749

Jo-Anne Pickel

Maouad v. Bertrand, 2015 HRTO 1732

Lucy Siraco

Jo-Anne Pickel

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2015 HRTO 1726

Scott Williams

Jo-Anne Pickel

Borba v. North York General Hospital, 2015 HRTO 1709

Misha Wilson

Elichai Shaffir

Jo-Anne Pickel

Bonnici v. Loblaws Inc., 2015 HRTO 1701

Jo-Anne Pickel

Angeles Toledo v. Mexitaco, 2015 HRTO 1672

Affected Party

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Respondents

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

for Fera Zubaidy

for First Canada ULC

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

for herself

for himself

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville