Ivana Denisov

The accused was charged with impaired driving and operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level exceeding 80 mg per 100 ml of blood following a RIDE spot check.

The impaired charge was dismissed due to lack of evidence of impairment.

On the Over 80 charge, the defence raised multiple Charter breaches including timing of breath samples, failure to videotape, lost evidence, lack of reasonable grounds, and denial of right to counsel.

The court rejected all Charter breach arguments and found the Crown proved the accused operated a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol level over the legal limit.

Conviction entered.

The Crown brought an application under section 123(1) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act seeking access to youth records of the accused for use in two separate Superior Court prosecutions (one involving four counts of attempted murder and one count of aggravated assault, and another involving a charge of first degree murder), as well as for transmission to the Parole Board of Canada.

The accused had previously been convicted of first degree murder and was serving a life sentence with parole ineligibility for twenty-five years.

The court dismissed the Crown's application as premature, finding that while the Crown had a valid and substantial interest in the records, access was not necessary in the interests of the proper administration of justice at that time.

The appellant, who was found not criminally responsible for a sexual assault, appealed a disposition of the Ontario Review Board that continued his detention on a secure forensic unit.

He argued he should be transferred to a general forensic unit or given a hybrid order.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the Board's decision reasonable given the appellant's ongoing inappropriate sexual behaviour and the increased risk to others if supervision were decreased.