The plaintiffs brought a motion to compel production of documents from the federal government in aid of cross-examination on an affidavit filed for a pending summary judgment motion based on limitation periods.
The government argued the requested documents were irrelevant because the plaintiffs had never seen them and therefore they could not affect the discoverability analysis under the Limitations Act, 2002.
The court held that documents relating to alleged defamatory communications and investigative conduct were relevant to determining when the cause of action accrued and when the limitation period began to run.
Given the relationship between the merits of the claims and the limitation defence, production was ordered.
The court also directed counsel to consider whether the summary judgment motion should be postponed until documentary production and discovery were completed.