Amanda Hill

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's Official Plan Amendment No. 788, which restricts new development on the subject lands to mid-rise buildings.

At the first Case Management Conference, the parties requested a second conference be scheduled for December 2025 to allow time for discussions and potential resolution.

The Tribunal scheduled the second Case Management Conference for December 10, 2025, and directed the parties to provide an update prior to the hearing.

The Ontario Land Tribunal issued a procedural order governing the hearing of appeals by the applicant regarding the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision.

The applications seek to permit the development of five residential apartment buildings with heights ranging from 12 to 30 storeys.

The order establishes the issues list, procedural dates, and a 20-day hearing scheduled to commence on September 9, 2025.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on applications for an official plan amendment, zoning by-law amendment, and draft plan of subdivision to permit five residential apartment buildings.

At a Case Management Conference, the Tribunal granted party status to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Long Branch Neighbourhood Association, but denied it to We Agree Mediation.

The Tribunal also granted participant status to 131 individuals and entities, and scheduled a 20-day merit hearing.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for a proposed 49-storey residential building.

The parties reached a settlement for a revised 62-storey development that includes heritage conservation, increased setbacks, and affordable housing contributions.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the City's Official Plan.

The appeals were allowed in part, and the amendments were approved in principle, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of several preconditions.

At a Case Management Conference, the Tribunal considered requests to substitute parties in appeals concerning a proposed 49-storey residential building in Toronto.

The Tribunal granted the unopposed request to substitute Carlyle Young Maitland GP Inc. as the Appellant, as it had acquired the subject property.

The Tribunal also granted the request to substitute OEF Village Green Nominee Inc. as a party in place of Greenrock, following OEF's acquisition of adjacent lands.

Finally, the Tribunal cancelled a previously scheduled hearing and set an accelerated written hearing date to consider a settlement offer accepted by City Council.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make decisions on applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Site Plan to permit a four-building residential redevelopment.

The parties reached a settlement, which City Council approved in principle.

Based on uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal allowed the zoning appeal in part on an interim basis, approving the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in principle subject to conditions.

The subdivision and site plan appeals were adjourned sine die.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision regarding a site plan application.

At the second Case Management Conference, the applicant requested that a hearing on the merits be scheduled.

The City requested an additional Case Management Conference to allow time for the related zoning by-law to be finalized, which would inform the issues list.

The Tribunal declined to schedule the merit hearing without a full understanding of the issues list and scheduled a further Case Management Conference.

The Tribunal convened a Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the City of Toronto for failing to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications within the prescribed timeframe.

The parties reached a settlement through alternative dispute resolution.

The Tribunal adjourned the matter pending a formal request from the parties to schedule a written settlement hearing.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a third Case Management Conference regarding an appeal by Mattamy (Eglinton) Limited for the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a proposed Plan of Subdivision.

The parties requested a further CMC in the fall to allow time for an ongoing Environmental Assessment in the Golden Mile area to unfold.

The Tribunal agreed and scheduled a fourth CMC for October 31, 2024.

The Ontario Land Tribunal issued an amending decision to correct a typographical error in its previous decision dated June 7, 2024.

The amendment corrected the overall height of the proposed 91-storey mixed-use building from 338.3 m to 328.4 m.

In all other respects, the original decision remains unchanged.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to increase the permitted height of a mixed-use building from 85 to 94 storeys.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement to permit a 91-storey building.

Based on uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan, noting it would provide additional housing and serve as a landmark without creating unacceptable adverse impacts.

The appeal was allowed in part and the amendments were approved in principle.

At a second Case Management Conference regarding an appeal for the municipality's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application, the parties advised they were close to a settlement.

The parties requested a three-day merit hearing be scheduled in the fall of 2024 out of an abundance of caution, pending a decision on a neighbouring property's application.

The Tribunal granted the request and scheduled the merit hearing for September 2024.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Approval for a proposed 35-storey residential building.

The parties reached a settlement on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part on an interim basis, withholding its final order until various conditions are satisfied.

The applicants appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 35-storey mixed-use building.

The parties subsequently reached a settlement for a revised 33-storey building with 450 residential units, including 53 replacement rental units.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan, representing appropriate transit-oriented intensification.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the amendment in principle, withholding its final order pending the satisfaction of several conditions.

A case management conference was held regarding appeals by the applicant against the city's failure to make decisions on official plan and zoning by-law amendments, as well as an appeal against a heritage designation by-law.

The parties were unable to reach a resolution regarding the consolidation of the appeals.

The Tribunal scheduled a motion hearing to address the applicant's request to consolidate the Planning Act appeals with the Ontario Heritage Act appeal, and set a timeline for the exchange of motion materials.

The Tribunal held Case Management Conferences for appeals regarding an Official Plan Amendment, a Zoning By-law Amendment, and a heritage designation by-law concerning a proposed 49-storey residential building in Toronto.

The parties requested that the heritage appeal remain separate from the planning appeals while they engage in settlement discussions.

The Tribunal scheduled a subsequent Case Management Conference for all appeals to take place on March 25, 2024, and directed the parties to provide a status update or a Procedural Order and Issues List prior to that date.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the City's failure to make decisions on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, as well as an appeal against a heritage designation by-law.

The Tribunal scheduled further Case Management Conferences for both matters to allow the parties to continue discussions and address potential procedural issues, including a possible Demolition Alteration Application appeal.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding an appeal by the applicants for the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a Draft Plan of Subdivision application within the statutory timeframe.

The Tribunal granted party status to Metro Ontario Real Estate Limited on consent.

A second Case Management Conference was scheduled for April 2, 2024, following a planned mediation session.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a draft plan of subdivision application within the statutory timeframe.

At the fourth Case Management Conference, the parties reported ongoing discussions to resolve the appeal but requested a fifth conference to continue providing structure to their communication.

The Tribunal scheduled a fifth Case Management Conference and issued procedural directions requiring the City to identify outstanding issues and provide draft conditions, and the appellant to confirm if Tribunal assistance is required.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the municipality's failure to make decisions on Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Site Plan applications for a proposed residential redevelopment.

The Tribunal granted participant status to one individual, directed the parties to file a Draft Procedural Order, and scheduled a second Case Management Conference.