The applicant appealed the City's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Plan of Subdivision to permit two mixed-use residential buildings of 40 and 42 storeys.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement and the subdivision appeal was withdrawn.
Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and applicable official plans, and representative of good planning.
The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part and approved the amendments in principle on an interim basis, withholding its final order pending the satisfaction of specified conditions, including wind safety mitigation and a parking agreement.