Alex Savanyu

The applicants appealed the City of Toronto's failure to adopt an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 30-storey mixed-use building with 550 residential units.

The parties reached a settlement, which was supported by uncontroverted expert planning evidence.

The Tribunal found the proposed instruments represented good planning, allowed for transit-supportive intensification, and conformed with applicable policies.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part on an interim basis, withholding its final order pending the satisfaction of several conditions.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to permit a 21-storey and a 38-storey residential tower.

The parties settled all issues except whether a minimum non-residential gross floor area should be required.

The Tribunal accepted the applicant's expert planning evidence that the site did not warrant a mandatory retail component and that the entirely residential development represented good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part on an interim basis, approving the zoning by-law amendment without the non-residential gross floor area requirement.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit a 29-storey residential building.

Following a settlement between the parties, the Tribunal held a written hearing and accepted uncontroverted expert planning evidence supporting the revised proposal.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part and approved the redevelopment in principle, withholding its final order pending the fulfillment of several conditions including finalized by-laws and servicing reports.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Approval for a proposed 35-storey residential building.

The parties reached a settlement on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part on an interim basis, withholding its final order until various conditions are satisfied.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment and a Site Plan to permit a mixed-use development featuring 40-storey and 23-storey buildings.

Following mediation, the parties reached a settlement on the Zoning By-law Amendment.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies, in conformity with the Official Plan, and representative of good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part on an interim basis, with the final order withheld pending the fulfillment of several conditions, including heritage conservation agreements.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a residential development at 11-23 Hollis Street.

Following mediation, the parties reached a settlement proposal for a 48-storey residential tower.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposal represents good planning, is consistent with provincial policies, and conforms to the applicable official plans.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part on an interim basis, withholding its final order until various pre-requisite conditions are satisfied by the applicant.

The applicants appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on their zoning by-law amendment applications for 53 and 55 Yonge Street.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement for a revised 66-storey mixed-use building.

Based on uncontested expert planning and transportation evidence, the Tribunal found the proposal represents an appropriate and desirable redevelopment within the Urban Growth Centre, conforms to provincial policy, and represents good planning.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the settlement proposal in principle, withholding its final order pending the finalization of the by-law and related engineering and transit conditions.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's refusal of a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development at 36-44 Eglinton Avenue West.

Following mediation, the parties reached a settlement for a revised 59-storey mixed-use building.

The Tribunal accepted uncontested expert planning evidence that the revised proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conforms to the Growth Plan and the City's Official Plan, and represents good land use planning.

The appeal was allowed in part, with the final order withheld pending the fulfillment of conditions.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to pass a zoning by-law amendment to facilitate a 43-storey mixed-use building.

The parties reached a settlement prior to the hearing.

Based on uncontested expert land use planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, conforms with the Growth Plan and the City's Official Plan, and represents good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part and the zoning by-law amendment was approved.