David Charezenko

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit three new apartment buildings on the subject lands.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

Based on uncontroverted planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, conforms to the City Official Plan, and represents good land use planning for an infill development within a Major Transit Station Area.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part on an interim basis, withholding its final order until the final form of the by-law and other conditions are satisfied.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 32-storey mixed-use building.

The parties reached a full settlement.

Based on the uncontradicted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal represented good planning and approved the amendments in principle, withholding its final order until certain conditions were met.

The applicant appealed the City of Markham's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a high-density residential mixed-use development.

The parties reached a settlement proposing five high-rise towers and a public park.

The Tribunal accepted uncontradicted expert planning evidence that the settlement proposal represents good planning, is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, and conforms to applicable official plans.

The appeals were allowed in part on an interim basis, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of municipal infrastructure and servicing conditions.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 21-storey residential building.

The parties reached a settlement.

Based on the uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed instruments consistent with provincial and municipal policies and approved them in principle, issuing an interim order withholding the final order until various conditions are satisfied.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to permit a new purpose-built rental apartment building.

The parties reached a full uncontested settlement.

Relying on the uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed amendment consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, approving the draft zoning by-law amendment in principle, and withheld its final order pending the satisfaction of several conditions.

The applicant appealed the Town of Oakville's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed-use building.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement for a revised 8-storey residential building with ground-floor commercial space.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and local official plans, and representative of good planning.

The appeals were allowed in part to implement the settlement.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 13-storey and a 4-storey apartment building on a site with an existing 15-storey building.

The parties reached a settlement prior to the hearing.

Based on the uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and Official Plan, and representative of good planning.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the Zoning By-law Amendment in principle, withholding the final order until certain conditions are met.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the redevelopment of the subject site with two 11-storey residential buildings.

The parties reached a settlement and presented revised amendments to the Tribunal.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal represents good planning, is consistent with provincial policies, and conforms to the City's Official Plan.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part and approved the amendments in principle, withholding its final order until several conditions are satisfied.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a Zoning By-law Amendment application for a residential infill development at 500 Duplex Avenue.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement that reduced the height and massing of the proposed buildings and included a public park dedication.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies, the Growth Plan, and the City's Official Plan.

The appeal was allowed in part, and the amendment was approved in principle, with the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of several conditions including rental housing demolition approval and infrastructure capacity confirmation.