Ryan D. Doherty

The applicant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for a 417-unit residential redevelopment.

Following a settlement between the parties, the Tribunal held a hearing in writing.

Relying on the uncontested affidavit evidence of a land use planner, the Tribunal found the revised proposal consistent with provincial policies and in conformity with the Official Plan.

The appeals were allowed in part, with the draft planning instruments approved in principle and the final order withheld pending the satisfaction of municipal engineering, urban design, and forestry conditions.

The applicant appealed the City's failure to make decisions on applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Site Plan to permit a four-building residential redevelopment.

The parties reached a settlement, which City Council approved in principle.

Based on uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal allowed the zoning appeal in part on an interim basis, approving the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in principle subject to conditions.

The subdivision and site plan appeals were adjourned sine die.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for a Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval to permit a mixed-use development.

Following a settlement between the parties, the proposal was revised to include a 58-storey building and a 12-storey building, addressing concerns regarding height, massing, and heritage conservation.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement consistent with provincial policies and the City's Official Plan.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, approving the Zoning By-law Amendment in principle and withholding its final order pending the satisfaction of several conditions.