T. Prevedel is a member at the Ontario Land Tribunal with 75 decisions on record from 2021 to 2022. Key areas include other tribunals, administrative law, real estate law.

What tribunal does T. Prevedel sit on?

T. Prevedel sits on the Ontario Land Tribunal.

What areas of law does T. Prevedel decide?

T. Prevedel's most common areas include Other Tribunals (70 decisions), Administrative Law (45 decisions), Real Estate Law (24 decisions). T. Prevedel has handled 75 decisions across 6 areas.

How many decisions has T. Prevedel made?

T. Prevedel has 75 decisions on record from 2021 to 2022.

Who frequently appears before T. Prevedel?

Representatives who frequently appear before T. Prevedel include Katarzyna Sliwa, Denitza Koev, Ian Andres.

T. Prevedel — Member

Wilson St. Ancaster Inc. v. Hamilton (City), 2022 CanLII 117805

Tribunal issues Procedural Order and schedules ten-day hearing for mixed-use development appeals.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by Wilson St. Ancaster Inc. against the City of Hamilton's refusal of Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for an eight-storey mixed-use development.

The Tribunal granted participant status to the Ancaster Village Heritage Community and a neighbouring resident on consent.

A Procedural Order was approved, and a ten-day video hearing was scheduled to commence on July 24, 2023.

OLTDec 5, 2022

12411460 Ontario Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 104001

Tribunal scheduled a two-day merit hearing for a parkland cash-in-lieu appeal.

The Tribunal held a third Case Management Conference regarding an appeal under subsection 42(10) of the Planning Act against the City of Toronto's failure to require the payment of cash-in-lieu of parkland before issuing a building permit.

The parties indicated that settlement discussions were ongoing.

The Tribunal scheduled a two-day merit hearing for March 6, 2023, and approved the Procedural Order.

OLTNov 4, 2022

D.D. Acquisitions Partnership v. Toronto (City.), 2022 CanLII 103980

Case Management Conference held to schedule a settlement hearing for an official plan amendment appeal.

OLTNov 4, 2022

Bhangu v. Windsor (City), 2022 CanLII 95919

Local improvement by-law for sanitary sewer construction approved over property owner objections due to environmental necessity.

The City of Windsor applied to the Ontario Land Tribunal for approval of a by-law to authorize the construction of a sanitary sewer and private drain connections as a local improvement.

Several property owners objected due to the costs and the mandatory decommissioning of their existing septic systems.

The City provided expert evidence demonstrating the environmental necessity of the sewer to prevent contamination from failing septic systems and offered several financial concessions to the affected property owners.

The Tribunal found the by-law appropriate and justified, noting the environmental evidence was unchallenged, and approved the by-law.

OLTOct 14, 2022

Bhangu v. Windsor (City), 2022 CanLII 98479

Local improvement by-law for sanitary sewer construction approved to address environmental contamination from septic systems.

The City of Windsor applied for approval of a local improvement by-law to authorize the construction of a sanitary sewer and private drain connections on Baseline Road.

Several property owners objected, raising concerns about the cost of the work, recent replacements of existing septic systems, and the mandatory decommissioning of septic systems.

The City presented expert engineering evidence demonstrating the environmental necessity of the sewer to reduce contamination from failing septic systems.

The City also offered several financial and procedural concessions to ease the burden on property owners.

The Tribunal found the environmental evidence unchallenged and the by-law appropriate and justified, approving the by-law and ordering the City to implement the proposed concessions.

OLTOct 14, 2022

Metroview Developments (Garden) Inc. v. Richmond Hill (City), 2022 CanLII 95923

Tribunal issues Procedural Order scheduling future CMC and merit hearing for planning appeals.

The applicant appealed the City of Richmond Hill's failure to make a decision on its Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications within the statutory timeframe.

At the second Case Management Conference, the parties advised they were engaged in without prejudice discussions on a revised development proposal.

On consent, the Tribunal issued a Procedural Order scheduling a third Case Management Conference for April 2023 and a 15-day merit hearing for September 2023 to allow time for the City to consider the revised proposal.

OLTOct 11, 2022

Lansink v. London (City), 2022 CanLII 93060

Tribunal approves consent modifications to London Plan maps resolving multiple site-specific appeals.

The Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding various remaining site-specific appeals to the City of London's new Official Plan, the 'London Plan'.

The City brought a motion, on consent of the appellants, to approve modifications to Maps 1 and 5 to resolve several site-specific appeals.

Based on the uncontested affidavit evidence of a senior planner, the Tribunal found the proposed modifications consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the London Plan, and representative of good planning.

The Tribunal approved the modifications, noted the withdrawal of several appeals, and scheduled future hearings and case management conferences for the remaining appeals.

OLTOct 3, 2022

1376412 Ontario Ltd. v. Hamilton (City), 2022 CanLII 88395

Tribunal schedules second Case Management Conference and 10-day merit hearing for subdivision appeal.

OLTSep 22, 2022

Milski Inc. v. Thorold (City), 2022 CanLII 88401

Participant status granted to two individuals at Case Management Conference for zoning by-law appeal.

OLTSep 21, 2022

Raglan Development Corp. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 85612

Tribunal grants participant status, schedules hearing, and approves procedural order for residential development appeal.

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment and site plan application for a 24-storey residential building.

At the first Case Management Conference, the Tribunal granted participant status to two local entities on consent, noted the parties' intent to pursue Tribunal-led mediation, scheduled a seven-day hearing on the merits, and approved the final Procedural Order and Issues List.

OLTSep 12, 2022

DeJong v. Havelock-Belmont-Methuen (Township), 2022 CanLII 80223

Consent order issued deeming zoning by-law amendment application complete without additional studies.

The appellants filed a motion under s. 34(10.5) of the Planning Act after the Township issued a notice of incomplete application for a zoning by-law amendment, requiring an Official Plan Amendment, Environmental Impact Study, and servicing report.

Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Tribunal issued a consent order deeming the application complete without the requested studies, subject to the appellants providing confirmation from the Health Unit regarding a septic system permit.

OLTSep 2, 2022

1984396 Ontario Inc. v. Niagara (Regional Municipality), 2022 CanLII 80245

Motion for review of decision dismissing appeal of Official Plan Amendment 26 denied.

The Appellant brought a motion requesting a review of a prior Tribunal decision that dismissed its appeal of the City of St. Catharines' Official Plan Amendment No. 26 in full, and sought a stay of the OPA.

The Appellant argued the Tribunal acted outside its jurisdiction, violated rules of natural justice, and made errors of law by dismissing the appeal in full when the responding parties had only sought partial dismissal.

The Tribunal found the Appellant failed to establish a convincing and compelling case under Rule 25.7 that the Tribunal made any of the enumerated errors.

The motion for review and request for a stay were dismissed.

OLTSep 1, 2022

C Squared Properties 160 John Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 80216

Tribunal defers party status request to allow mediation and schedules second case management conference.

The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to allow a 6-storey addition to an existing 5-storey office building.

At the first Case Management Conference, an adjacent property owner requested party status due to concerns about snow and water runoff and development potential impacts.

The Tribunal deferred the party status request to allow the parties to engage in mediation and scheduled a second Case Management Conference for February 2023.

OLTAug 30, 2022

1754260 Ontario Limited v. Aurora (Town), 2022 CanLII 78149

Tribunal approves settlement for Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to permit a 345-unit residential development.

The appellant appealed the Town of Aurora's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a residential development.

The parties reached a settlement for a revised proposal consisting of three 7-storey apartment buildings with 345 units, including an affordable housing component.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence that the revised proposal is consistent with provincial policies and conforms to applicable official plans, the Tribunal approved the settlement and the requested amendments.

OLTAug 26, 2022

Shimvest Investments Limited v. Aurora (Town), 2022 CanLII 78161

Tribunal grants party and participant status and issues procedural order for development appeals.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding appeals by the applicant against the municipality's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Approval for a proposed 6-storey residential building.

The Tribunal granted party status to the regional municipality and one resident, and participant status to several other area residents.

The Tribunal also scheduled a 10-day hearing and approved the Procedural Order and Issues List.

OLTAug 25, 2022

Woodstock Biomed Inc. v. Pelham (Town), 2022 CanLII 78148

Tribunal approves cannabis zoning regulations and settlement, dismissing appeal by producer lacking formal application.

The Town of Pelham adopted an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) and Zoning By-Law Amendment (ZBLA) to regulate indoor cannabis and industrial hemp cultivation, primarily to address odour concerns.

Several cannabis producers appealed.

Prior to the hearing, Phoena withdrew its appeal, and Redecan reached a settlement with the Town, which the Tribunal approved as representing good planning.

Woodstock continued its appeal, arguing it should be recognized as an existing facility and granted a site-specific exception.

The Tribunal dismissed Woodstock's appeal, noting it had never formally filed an application and must pursue approvals through the standard process established by the new OPA.

OLTAug 23, 2022

Tribute (Queensway) Limited v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 78189

Tribunal issues amended Procedural Order for a 10-day hearing regarding a mixed-use development in Toronto.

OLTAug 22, 2022

Adelaide Nelson Residences LP v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 75917

Tribunal schedules further case management conference and merit hearing for King Spadina Secondary Plan appeals.

OLTAug 15, 2022

Stephenson v. Ontario (Municipal Affairs and Housing), 2022 CanLII 73931

Tribunal issues procedural order and schedules hearing for appeal of refused consent to sever.

The appellant appealed the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing's refusal to grant a consent to sever a 0.9-hectare property on Two Island Lake to create a new lot for recreational dwellings.

At the first Case Management Conference, the Tribunal recognized the parties, noted the withdrawal of a party status request from a neighbour, and scheduled a four-day video hearing.

The Tribunal also approved the Procedural Order and Issues List, which focuses on lake capacity, consistency with the Provincial Policy Statement, and criteria under the Planning Act.

OLTAug 11, 2022

South Bracebridge Environmental Protection Group v. District Municipality of Muskoka (Municipality), 2022 CanLII 71613

Tribunal denies site access and strikes several proposed witnesses for irrelevance, bias, and procedural non-compliance.

The Appellant brought a motion for site access to conduct additional environmental studies, and the Applicant brought a motion to strike several witnesses from the Appellant's witness list.

The Tribunal dismissed the motion for site access, finding it inappropriate and academic given the upcoming deadlines.

The Tribunal granted the motion to strike in part, striking an economic impact witness for lack of relevance, an environmental expert for reasonable apprehension of bias, and two lay witnesses who had already been granted participant status.

The Tribunal also ordered that multiple experts in the same disciplines (land use planning and wetland assessment) be called as panels to avoid duplication of evidence.

OLTAug 4, 2022

Wilson St. Ancaster Inc. v. Hamilton (City), 2022 CanLII 117805

12411460 Ontario Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 104001

D.D. Acquisitions Partnership v. Toronto (City.), 2022 CanLII 103980

Bhangu v. Windsor (City), 2022 CanLII 95919

Bhangu v. Windsor (City), 2022 CanLII 98479

Metroview Developments (Garden) Inc. v. Richmond Hill (City), 2022 CanLII 95923

Lansink v. London (City), 2022 CanLII 93060

1376412 Ontario Ltd. v. Hamilton (City), 2022 CanLII 88395

Milski Inc. v. Thorold (City), 2022 CanLII 88401

Raglan Development Corp. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 85612

DeJong v. Havelock-Belmont-Methuen (Township), 2022 CanLII 80223

1984396 Ontario Inc. v. Niagara (Regional Municipality), 2022 CanLII 80245

C Squared Properties 160 John Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 80216

1754260 Ontario Limited v. Aurora (Town), 2022 CanLII 78149

Shimvest Investments Limited v. Aurora (Town), 2022 CanLII 78161

Woodstock Biomed Inc. v. Pelham (Town), 2022 CanLII 78148

Tribute (Queensway) Limited v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 78189

Adelaide Nelson Residences LP v. Toronto (City), 2022 CanLII 75917

Stephenson v. Ontario (Municipal Affairs and Housing), 2022 CanLII 73931

South Bracebridge Environmental Protection Group v. District Municipality of Muskoka (Municipality), 2022 CanLII 71613

for 12411460 Ontario Inc.

for 1319283 Ontario Inc. (“Dunpar”)

for 1376412 Ontario Ltd. (Zeina Homes)

for 1386073 Ontario Inc.

for 1507565 Ontario Inc. (Frisina)

for 1972380 Ontario Ltd. and 1219414 Ontario Ltd.

for 2498704 Ontario Inc., 60 Eglinton West Limited, 90 Eglinton West Limited and 2498703 Ontario Inc.

for 5507 River Development Inc.

for 5799 Yonge Street Limited Partnership (“M2M”)

for 582302 Ontario Limited

for 5959 Yonge Street Limited (“Ghods”)

for 6965083 Canada Inc.

for 6 Dawes Danforth Inc. et al.

for Aldo Di Felice (“Di Felice”)

for Artstone/Corpveil

for Auburn, KAP, 1610341 Ontario Inc., Grosvenor Development Corp., and Richmond North MCC675

for Auburn, York and Westdell

for BARMMAR Investments Ltd. and BMMB Investments Ltd.

for Bell Canada

for Black Bear Estate Inc.

for Black Bear Estates Inc.

for Bromont Homes Inc.

for Build It Green Canada Inc.

for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited

for CastandGrey 5 Corp. and CastandGrey 7 Corp.

for Catherine Gravely

for Citizens for Responsible Development (Niagara Falls)

for City of Cambridge

for City of Hamilton

for City of Kawartha Lakes

for City of Toronto

for City of Toronto (“City”)

for Comhold Investments Ltd., Medlaw Corporation and Mason Burch

for Conservation Halton

for Cornwall Gravel Co. Ltd.

for Corporation for the Diocese, St Alphonsus Church

for Cosmetica Investments Inc.

for County of Grey

for County of Simcoe

for CP Reit

for D.D. Acquisitions Partnership

for Derek Coleman

for DiCenzo (Golf Club Road) Holdings Inc., DiCenzo Construction Company Limited

for Dundeal Canada (GP) Inc.

for Elfrida Landowners

for Fenelon Trails Inc. and 2185373 Ontario Inc.

for Flamborough Power Centre Inc.

for Flato Lindsay Community Inc.

for Flato Lindsay Community Inc., Comhold Investments Ltd., Medlaw Corporation and Mason Burch

for FoTTSA

for Georgetown Country Properties Ltd.

for Grey Condominium Corporation No. 11

for Habitat for Humanity Niagara

for Hamilton Country Properties Ltd.

for Harbour West Residents Group Inc.

for Heddle Marine Service Inc., 340A Lakeshore Road Inc.

for herself

for Hildagard Annie Shiry, Brian Harold Shiry, Pauline Victoria Shiry and Helen Elizabeth Shiry

for himself

for Holmes Avenue Ltd.