Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Application reactivated; prior grievance withdrawal and OLRB dismissal did not deal with human rights substance.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application after the conclusion of a grievance process.

The respondent opposed, arguing the application should be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code or as an abuse of process because the union settled the grievance by not pursuing arbitration, and the applicant's subsequent duty of fair representation complaint was dismissed by the OLRB.

The Tribunal granted the reactivation, finding that the substance of the application had not been dealt with in another proceeding.

The Tribunal also granted the union's request to intervene.

Lopes v. Group G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2014 HRTO 768

Andrew Zabrovsky

32 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2014

Adjournment request denied as applicant failed to identify allegedly unavailable lawyer and witness.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing, citing the unavailability of her lawyer and a witness.

The respondent objected.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the applicant failed to identify the lawyer or confirm they were retained, and failed to identify the witness or explain the relevance of their evidence.

The Tribunal emphasized that under its Practice Direction on Scheduling, adjournments are only granted in extraordinary circumstances, which were not established here.

Debra Zalter v. Corporation of the Town of Ajax, 2014 HRTO 757

Mindy Noble

43 cases2010–2026

Julie O’Donnell

16 cases2000–2022

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2014

Motion to amend human rights application to add ground of creed granted; no prejudice to respondents.

The applicant requested an order to amend her human rights application to include the ground of creed, explaining she inadvertently omitted it when self-represented.

The respondents opposed, claiming prejudice and the need for further investigation.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting the original application explicitly linked the applicant's head scarf to her religion, meaning the respondents were not prejudiced by the amendment.

Abdulle v. Old Navy Canada, 2014 HRTO 762

Anne Posno

7 cases1996–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing by teleconference to determine whether the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Despite receiving notice, the applicant failed to attend the hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Mathurin v. DeKoven, 2014 HRTO 637

Glorie Alfred

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2010–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 25, 2014

Tribunal declines to dismiss human rights applications against school principal at summary hearing stage.

The applicants, two students represented by their parents, filed human rights applications alleging discrimination by the respondent school principal based on ancestry, ethnic origin, place of origin, race, and reprisal.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the applications had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicants had raised sufficient allegations, including that the father was stereotyped as volatile and angry, to warrant a full hearing.

The request to dismiss the applications was denied, and the parties were directed to provide submissions on consolidating the two applications.

S.T. v. Paige, 2014 HRTO 586

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Notice of Hearing and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction requiring the exchange and filing of documents, witness lists, and witness statements.

The applicant also failed to respond to the respondent's request to dismiss the application.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned and cancelled the scheduled hearing dates.

Adetokunbo Adeoye v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 560

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 1, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for abandonment after applicant failed to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code but failed to comply with a Case Assessment Direction to file documents and witness lists.

The applicant's former counsel advised they no longer represented the applicant due to an inability to contact him.

The Tribunal issued a second direction warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Craig v. Kenron Residents Association, 2014 HRTO 453

Terry Hill

8 cases1998–2021

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2014

Hearing adjourned due to applicant's concussion and resulting memory loss pending further medical documentation.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing due to ongoing complications from a concussion, including memory loss, supported by a doctor's note.

The respondents opposed the request, arguing the memory loss was not significant enough to warrant an adjournment.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that the applicant's medical condition constituted an exceptional circumstance, and directed the applicant to provide further medical documentation regarding his prognosis and ability to participate in a hearing.

Eric Mattison v. Town of Pelham and Sarah Thomson, 2014 HRTO 274

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 26, 2014

Union granted leave to intervene in member's human rights application alleging disability discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant's union, Unifor, filed a Request to Intervene.

As neither the applicant nor the respondent opposed the request, and unions generally have an interest in applications brought by bargaining unit members, the Tribunal granted the union leave to intervene.

Jessica Chauvin v. Extendicare Southwood Lakes, 2014 HRTO 263

Lisa C. Cabel

12 cases2011–2015

David A. Gourlay

37 cases2010–2026

Antonella Ceddia

Practising Law - Employed42 cases2008–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 25, 2014

Summary hearing motion to dismiss human rights applications alleging racial profiling by police denied.

The applicant filed three human rights applications alleging discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ethnic origin, reprisal, and sex by the Toronto Police Services Board and individual officers during three separate traffic and pedestrian stops.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing in writing to determine whether the applications should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations were sufficiently out of the ordinary to require an explanation from the respondents, and therefore the applications had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal ordered the three applications to be heard together at an in-person hearing.

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 261

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 21, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and subsequently failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence inquiring about her intentions with respect to the application.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Pearce v. Peladeau Groceries Inc., 2014 HRTO 241

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 20, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to Tribunal.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation session and her counsel removed themselves from the record due to lack of communication.

After the applicant failed to respond to a Tribunal direction inquiring about her intentions, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Brophy v. Ontario Drive & Gear Limited, 2014 HRTO 236

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the application because it appeared to be outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction and was incomplete.

The applicant was granted an extension to respond but failed to do so.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Dube v. Assembly of First Nations, 2014 HRTO 226

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 30, 2014

Human rights application dismissed as the respondent federal agency falls under exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on ancestry against the Canadian Forces Personnel Family Support Services.

The respondent filed a Request for Order to dismiss the application, arguing it is a federal agency listed in Schedule V of the Financial Administration Act and therefore falls under federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the regulation of labour relations in a federal agency is within exclusive federal jurisdiction, and dismissed the application.

Bedore v. Canadian Forces Personnel Family Support Services, 2014 HRTO 140

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2014

Reconsideration request to add new respondents for enforcement purposes denied as Tribunal is functus officio.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration four years after a final decision in her favour, seeking to add or substitute new corporate and personal respondents to aid in enforcing the Tribunal's order.

The Tribunal denied the request, holding that it was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to reopen the decision, hold a fresh hearing against new parties, or grant an oppression remedy for creditors.

Thompson v. Selective Personnel Ltd., 2014 HRTO 121

Marnie Corbold

17 cases1999–2017

Marianne Craig

5 cases2012–2016

Caroline Jones

12 cases2006–2022

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 28, 2014

Reconsideration of interim decision denied; refusal to dismiss under s. 45.1 is not a final decision.

The respondent requested reconsideration of an interim decision that refused to dismiss the human rights application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The union, OPSEU, sought intervenor status and supported the reconsideration request.

The Tribunal granted OPSEU intervenor status but denied the reconsideration request.

The Tribunal held that the interim decision was not a 'final decision' subject to reconsideration under its Rules, as it did not dispose of a central issue.

Furthermore, the Tribunal declined to reconsider the decision on its own motion, finding no compelling or extraordinary circumstances to outweigh the public interest in finality.

Roselle Beausoleil v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 123

Devon Paul

21 cases2013–2024

Andrew Zabrovsky

32 cases2010–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 17, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant's union had already filed a grievance based on the same facts.

The union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene and deferred the application pending the completion of the grievance arbitration, noting the risk of conflicting decisions if both proceedings continued concurrently.

Moran v. Georgian Bay General Hospital, 2014 HRTO 15

Kate Dearden

18 cases2012–2020

Jerrry Raso

1 case2014–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2014

Union granted leave to intervene; request to amend application deferred to hearing adjudicator.

The applicant's union, OECTA, requested leave to intervene in the human rights application.

As the request was unopposed, the Tribunal granted intervention status, noting that a union nearly always has an interest in an application brought by a member.

The applicant also requested to amend his Application to include broader public interest remedies.

The Tribunal deferred this request to the hearing adjudicator to consider potential adjudicative resource implications and possible bifurcation.

Michael Giftopoulos v. Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board, 2014 HRTO 51

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to provide reasonable explanation for late filing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability after his employer allegedly refused to return him to work following a car accident.

The application was filed more than two years after the last alleged incident of discrimination.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay in pursuing his rights, and therefore the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Courchesne v. Farquhar Cabinets Inc., 2014 HRTO 19

Judy Gayford

1 case2014–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 6, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to provide good faith explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of colour and race, 17 months after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for delay.

The applicant argued the delay was incurred in good faith because she mistakenly pursued a Small Claims Court action regarding a different incident.

The Tribunal found the applicant provided no reasonable explanation for failing to pursue the specific allegations of discrimination in a timely manner.

The application was dismissed for delay.

Morris-Davis v. Meadow Park Inc., 2014 HRTO 9

Page 14 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 14 of 49 (975 cases)

Laurie Kent

Christopher McClelland

Naomi Overend

Lopes v. Group G4S Secure Solutions (Canada) Ltd., 2014 HRTO 768

Andrew Zabrovsky

Naomi Overend

Debra Zalter v. Corporation of the Town of Ajax, 2014 HRTO 757

Mindy Noble

Julie O’Donnell

Naomi Overend

Abdulle v. Old Navy Canada, 2014 HRTO 762

Anne Posno

Naomi Overend

Mathurin v. DeKoven, 2014 HRTO 637

Glorie Alfred

Naomi Overend

S.T. v. Paige, 2014 HRTO 586

Naomi Overend

Adetokunbo Adeoye v. The Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 560

Naomi Overend

Craig v. Kenron Residents Association, 2014 HRTO 453

Terry Hill

Naomi Overend

Eric Mattison v. Town of Pelham and Sarah Thomson, 2014 HRTO 274

Naomi Overend

Jessica Chauvin v. Extendicare Southwood Lakes, 2014 HRTO 263

Lisa C. Cabel

David A. Gourlay

Antonella Ceddia

Naomi Overend

Surh v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 261

Naomi Overend

Pearce v. Peladeau Groceries Inc., 2014 HRTO 241

Naomi Overend

Brophy v. Ontario Drive & Gear Limited, 2014 HRTO 236

Naomi Overend

Dube v. Assembly of First Nations, 2014 HRTO 226

Naomi Overend

Bedore v. Canadian Forces Personnel Family Support Services, 2014 HRTO 140

Naomi Overend

Thompson v. Selective Personnel Ltd., 2014 HRTO 121

Marnie Corbold

Marianne Craig

Caroline Jones

Naomi Overend

Roselle Beausoleil v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2014 HRTO 123

Devon Paul

Andrew Zabrovsky

Naomi Overend

Moran v. Georgian Bay General Hospital, 2014 HRTO 15

Kate Dearden

Jerrry Raso

Naomi Overend

Michael Giftopoulos v. Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board, 2014 HRTO 51

Naomi Overend

Courchesne v. Farquhar Cabinets Inc., 2014 HRTO 19

Judy Gayford

Naomi Overend

Morris-Davis v. Meadow Park Inc., 2014 HRTO 9

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself