Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Consent order issued permitting applicant to keep a hot tub for medical accommodation subject to conditions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in housing based on disability, seeking to keep a hot tub on her exclusive use common element for medical treatment.

The parties reached a settlement and requested a consent order from the Tribunal.

The Tribunal issued a final order under s. 45.9(2) of the Human Rights Code, permitting the hot tub to remain subject to specific conditions regarding insurance, liability, maintenance, and its eventual removal upon the sale of the unit.

Box v. Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 474, 2013 HRTO 2057

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed; gym membership cancelled for making anti-Islamic comments, not religious discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of creed after his gym membership was cancelled.

The applicant, who identifies as Christian, made anti-Islamic comments to other gym members, causing complaints.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing and found that the respondent gym had a positive obligation to ensure its clients were not subject to a poisoned environment.

The Tribunal concluded that the application had no reasonable prospect of success because the respondent's actions were based on the applicant's imposition of his views on others, not his own creed.

The application was dismissed.

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2013 HRTO 2033

Anthony Baluara

1 case2013–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 27, 2013

Human rights applications regarding food bank access dismissed for delay and no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed three human rights applications alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and age, as well as reprisal, regarding her treatment at two food banks.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the applications should be dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the first application for having no reasonable prospect of success, finding no link between the alleged poor treatment and a prohibited ground under the Code.

The Tribunal dismissed the remaining two applications for delay, as they were filed outside the one-year limitation period and the applicant failed to provide a good faith explanation for the delay.

Woodwork v. Presbyterian Church in Canada, 2013 HRTO 1965

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 20, 2013

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application granted following conclusion of WSIB appeal.

The applicant filed a Request for Order to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of her WSIB appeal.

The applicant provided the Appeals Resolution Officer's decision.

The respondent did not file any response submissions.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application and directed the matter to proceed to mediation.

Adelina Grabnor v. AGO Industries, 2013 HRTO 1922

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 20, 2013

Tribunal schedules preliminary hearing on s. 45.1 dismissal and grants union intervenor status.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status and reprisal.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code or as an abuse of process, arguing the matter was resolved through a union grievance and minutes of settlement.

The Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine the dismissal request and granted the applicant's union, UFCW Local 175, intervenor status.

Mahbub-Ur Rahman v. Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2013 HRTO 1930

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 10, 2013

Request for reconsideration of interim decision denying sports team eligibility dismissed.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that dismissed her request for an interim remedy regarding her eligibility to play on team sports.

The Tribunal found that an interim decision is not a final decision subject to reconsideration under Rule 26.1.

Furthermore, the Tribunal reiterated that it likely lacked jurisdiction over the age discrimination claim unless the applicant successfully challenged the definition of age in the Code.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

D.V. v. Georgian Bay Secondary School Association, 2013 HRTO 1718

Glorie Alfred

Practising Law - Employed24 cases2010–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Human rights allegations pre-dating the one-year time limit dismissed for delay without good faith explanation.

The applicants filed human rights applications alleging discrimination by the respondent, a former school principal.

The respondent sought to dismiss allegations pre-dating the one-year time limit under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that incidents occurring between 2006 and 2009 were not part of a series of incidents with those occurring within the time limit.

The Tribunal also found no good faith explanation for the delay in filing.

Consequently, allegations pre-dating April 2010 were dismissed as untimely.

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 1660

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 27, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal's status inquiry.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, which was deferred pending the conclusion of ongoing grievance proceedings.

The Tribunal subsequently requested an update on the status of the grievance proceedings, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's inquiry.

Consequently, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Richards v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1629

Marnie Corbold

17 cases1999–2017

Marianne Craig

5 cases2012–2016

Katie Clements

21 cases2011–2020

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 16, 2013

Request to dismiss human rights application denied as prior grievance decision lacked specific findings on discrimination.

The respondent brought a preliminary request to dismiss the applicant's human rights application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the substance of her gender discrimination complaint had already been dealt with in a prior grievance mediation-arbitration process.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the Vice-Chair's brief reasons in the grievance process did not specify whether the discrimination allegations were considered.

Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Penner, the Tribunal concluded it would be unfair to use the results of the prior proceeding to preclude the human rights claim.

Roselle Beausoleil v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1553

Robert Budd

5 cases1991–2014

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 13, 2013

Human rights application alleging racial discrimination in employment dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a Personal Support Worker and recent Chinese immigrant, alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of race after she was transferred to casual status and her hours were reduced following incidents involving resident care.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that even if the applicant could prove she was treated unfairly, she had no reasonable prospect of establishing a link between her treatment and her race or immigrant status, as there was no evidence of discriminatory comments or conduct.

The application was dismissed.

Wang v. Lakeland Long Term Care, 2013 HRTO 1542

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 11, 2013

Tribunal directs non-responding party to file response within 14 days or face proceeding without notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against two respondents.

One respondent filed a response, but the other, the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, failed to do so.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the non-responding party to file a response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay.

The Tribunal warned that failure to comply could result in the matter proceeding without further notice, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Dianne Lalonde v. Casino Rama and Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1525

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal sent multiple requests to the applicant to provide mutually agreeable dates to reschedule a summary hearing and to confirm her intentions with respect to the application.

The applicant failed to respond to any of the Tribunal's correspondence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Marie Mathurin v. Gateway Property Management Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1503

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) on the basis that the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Krishan Kapoor v. Thomas Emyr, 2013 HRTO 1502

Jonathan Dye

8 cases2012–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 5, 2013

Reconsideration request denied; applicant failed to prove he lacked notice of the delay issue.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a decision dismissing his human rights application for delay.

He argued that his former representative was responsible for the late filing and that he was unaware delay was an issue until the dismissal decision was released.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide evidence supporting his claim of ignorance regarding the delay issue, noting his signed Reply addressed the issue.

The request for reconsideration was denied as the applicant did not meet the threshold criteria under Rule 26.

Reid v. Marriott Hotels of Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 1500

Stephen MacDonald

4 cases2013–2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 19, 2013

Interim remedy to bypass high school sports transfer policy denied due to jurisdictional doubts regarding age discrimination.

The applicant, a high school student, sought an interim remedy to allow her to play interschool sports at her new French-language school, despite a Transfer Policy that restricted her eligibility for one year.

She alleged the policy discriminated on the basis of ancestry, place of origin, citizenship, ethnic origin, and age.

The Tribunal denied the request for an interim remedy, finding serious doubt about its jurisdiction because the Code's definition of age is restricted to persons 18 years or older, and the applicant's claim relied on a constitutional challenge to that definition.

D.V. v. Georgian Bay Secondary School Association, 2013 HRTO 1420

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 19, 2013

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant failed to meet threshold criteria under Rule 26.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his application for lack of jurisdiction and as an abuse of process.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish any of the threshold criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26, such as new facts, conflict with established jurisprudence, or other factors outweighing the public interest in finality.

The request for reconsideration was denied.

John Doe v. A & W Canada, 2013 HRTO 1422

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 15, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond to correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The parties consented to mediation, but the applicant failed to attend the scheduled mediation.

The Tribunal subsequently sent a letter and email requesting the applicant to advise whether she intended to proceed with her application, warning that failure to respond might result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Jheran v. Regis Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1402

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 15, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After a mediation was rescheduled, the Tribunal made multiple attempts to contact the applicant to obtain mutually agreeable dates.

The applicant failed to respond to emails and letters, including a final warning letter sent to her correct address.

As the applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's communications, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Fowler v. Mortgage Brokers City Inc., 2013 HRTO 1405

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 15, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the applicant to file written consent or submissions regarding the respondent's use and disclosure of her personal health information, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond to the interim decision and a subsequent email from the Tribunal.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Patricia Vinayagamoorthie v. Dr. Jeannette Salib’s Doctor’s Office, 2013 HRTO 1406

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 14, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on race and ethnic origin.

The applicant failed to attend a scheduled mediation and subsequently failed to respond to a Tribunal direction inquiring whether she intended to proceed with the application.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Wynesha Dettering v. Adecco Employment Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 1394

Page 15 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 15 of 49 (975 cases)

Zahra Binbrek

Kristin Ley

Naomi Overend

Box v. Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 474, 2013 HRTO 2057

Naomi Overend

Eric Brazau v. Extreme Fitness, 2013 HRTO 2033

Anthony Baluara

Naomi Overend

Woodwork v. Presbyterian Church in Canada, 2013 HRTO 1965

Naomi Overend

Adelina Grabnor v. AGO Industries, 2013 HRTO 1922

Naomi Overend

Mahbub-Ur Rahman v. Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2013 HRTO 1930

Naomi Overend

D.V. v. Georgian Bay Secondary School Association, 2013 HRTO 1718

Glorie Alfred

Naomi Overend

S.T. v. Paige, 2013 HRTO 1660

Naomi Overend

Richards v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1629

Marnie Corbold

Marianne Craig

Katie Clements

Naomi Overend

Roselle Beausoleil v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2013 HRTO 1553

Robert Budd

Naomi Overend

Wang v. Lakeland Long Term Care, 2013 HRTO 1542

Naomi Overend

Dianne Lalonde v. Casino Rama and Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1525

Naomi Overend

Marie Mathurin v. Gateway Property Management Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1503

Naomi Overend

Krishan Kapoor v. Thomas Emyr, 2013 HRTO 1502

Jonathan Dye

Naomi Overend

Reid v. Marriott Hotels of Canada Ltd., 2013 HRTO 1500

Stephen MacDonald

Naomi Overend

D.V. v. Georgian Bay Secondary School Association, 2013 HRTO 1420

Naomi Overend

John Doe v. A & W Canada, 2013 HRTO 1422

Naomi Overend

Jheran v. Regis Corporation, 2013 HRTO 1402

Naomi Overend

Fowler v. Mortgage Brokers City Inc., 2013 HRTO 1405

Naomi Overend

Patricia Vinayagamoorthie v. Dr. Jeannette Salib’s Doctor’s Office, 2013 HRTO 1406

Naomi Overend

Wynesha Dettering v. Adecco Employment Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 1394

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

for P & H Foods, Respondent