The applicant's union, OECTA, requested leave to intervene in the human rights application.
As the request was unopposed, the Tribunal granted intervention status, noting that a union nearly always has an interest in an application brought by a member.
The applicant also requested to amend his Application to include broader public interest remedies.
The Tribunal deferred this request to the hearing adjudicator to consider potential adjudicative resource implications and possible bifurcation.
