Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Shaheen Hirani

Suspended Administratively14 cases1997–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2014

Application against certain respondents dismissed on consent; union's request to intervene granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss against Oncidium Health Group and the union because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination by them.

The applicant agreed with the notice, and the application against those respondents was dismissed.

The union subsequently filed a Request to Intervene, which the Tribunal granted as it was unopposed and raised issues that may affect the union.

Dombroskie v. Veyance Technologies Canada Inc., 2014 HRTO 647

Dijana Simonovic

Practising Law - Employed15 cases2006–2024

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2014

Request to amend human rights application to change discrimination ground to sex and increase damages granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status, specifically that she was terminated due to pregnancy.

She subsequently brought a request to amend her application to change the ground of discrimination from family status to sex, and to increase the monetary damages sought.

The respondent did not file a response to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding the amendments were minor or related solely to relief, and would not prejudice the respondent or negatively impact the hearing.

Lugonia v. Arista Homes, 2014 HRTO 606

Tribunal declined to defer human rights application pending grievance process because application raised broader issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by her former employers and a new service provider following her return to work from hip replacement surgery.

The union had previously filed a grievance alleging failure to accommodate.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding.

The Tribunal declined to defer, finding that the application raised broader issues, including the new service provider's refusal to hire the applicant, which could not be addressed in the grievance process.

Arruda v. Brookfield Properties Management Corporation, 2014 HRTO 598

K.C. Wysynski

11 cases2014–2018

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2014

Human rights application dismissed summarily for untimeliness and lacking a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ethnic origin, and creed, as well as reprisal, in relation to her employment and its termination.

The respondents requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application on a preliminary basis.

The Tribunal found that the allegations regarding incidents prior to the termination of employment were untimely, as the applicant failed to provide specific dates and did not establish that the delay was incurred in good faith.

Regarding the termination itself, the Tribunal concluded there was no reasonable prospect of success, as the applicant failed to point to any material evidence linking the termination to a protected ground or establishing the elements of reprisal.

The application was dismissed in its entirety.

Patricia Baichan v. Assante Capital Management Ltd. and Dixie Allen, 2014 HRTO 592

Natasha De Menna

2 cases2009–2014

Glenn Christie

25 cases1998–2017

Barry Swadron

4 cases1991–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 25, 2014

Tribunal declined to defer human rights application pending related grievance proceeding on consent of all parties.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer to determine whether the human rights application should be deferred pending the resolution of a related grievance proceeding.

The applicant, respondents, and affected party all filed submissions opposing deferral.

The Tribunal agreed with the parties, declined to defer the application, and directed that it be processed in the normal course.

Sandhu v. Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 573

David J. Bannon

12 cases2001–2019

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 23, 2014

Applicant directed to accept late document disclosure as no real prejudice was identified.

The applicant and respondent both filed written submissions regarding the respondent's late delivery of arguably relevant documents.

The applicant refused to accept the courier delivery of the documents, which were delivered approximately three weeks late.

The applicant requested that the hearing be expedited and the respondent be precluded from presenting documents at the hearing.

The respondent requested that the applicant be directed to accept the late delivery.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to accept the delivery, finding no real prejudice to the applicant, and denied the applicant's requests.

Edward Piatowski v. General Motors of Canada Ltd., 2014 HRTO 567

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2014

Tribunal orders police service to produce respondent's address to allow service of application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging she was assaulted by an individual respondent at her workplace.

The application sent to the individual respondent's former workplace was returned.

The applicant requested an order directing the Toronto Police Service to produce the individual respondent's current address.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting its authority under the Human Rights Code and Rules of Procedure to order non-party production to ensure the fair, just, and expeditious resolution of the matter.

de Koning v. St. Louis Bar and Grill Cityplace, 2014 HRTO 561

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 10, 2014

Adjournment granted with conditions; applicant must provide a doctor's note detailing medical conditions.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing due to medical conditions, but did not provide a doctor's note.

The request was made more than 14 days after the Notice of Hearing was issued.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment request with conditions, directing the applicant to provide a doctor's note answering specific questions about his medical conditions and ability to participate in a hearing within 21 days.

Major v. V Group Call Centre, 2014 HRTO 514

Karen R. Bock

4 cases2013–2016

J James Nyman

38 cases1981–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 7, 2014

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging harassment and discrimination by her employer.

Prior to this, her union had filed a grievance on her behalf raising the same human rights issues.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the outcome of the grievance arbitration.

Finding that the grievance was filed first, dealt with the same subject matter, and was scheduled for arbitration before an arbitrator with the authority to apply the Human Rights Code, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application.

Shari Sookhai v. Enbridge Gas Distribution, 2014 HRTO 478

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 31, 2014

Reconsideration request dismissed as applicant merely attempted to reargue the case without meeting required criteria.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application as an abuse of process and declared her a vexatious litigant.

The applicant argued that the decision should be reconsidered under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant failed to explain how her request met the criteria for reconsideration and instead merely repeated arguments made at the original hearing or raised new arguments that could have been made earlier.

The Tribunal emphasized that reconsideration is not an appeal or an opportunity to reargue a case.

Shi v. Holcim (Canada) Inc., 2014 HRTO 450

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 28, 2014

Request for reconsideration of summarily dismissed human rights applications denied.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that summarily dismissed her nine human rights applications.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to explain how her request met the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5, instead repeating arguments made at the hearing.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

Kim v. The Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2014 HRTO 444

Andrea York

7 cases2008–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2014

Tribunal orders mutual production of arguably relevant documents regarding work performance and mitigation efforts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging her employment was terminated due to pregnancy.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed cross-requests for the production of documents.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to produce arguably relevant communications and performance reviews containing feedback on the applicant's work performance, while denying her broader requests for surveillance footage and notebooks.

The Tribunal also ordered the applicant to produce unredacted documents relating to her mitigation efforts, as she had claimed lost income and alleged an inability to find work due to her pregnancy.

Pooneh Piri v. Nestle Waters Canada, 2014 HRTO 435

Claudio Martini

22 cases2002–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2014

Tribunal orders production of cell phone records from non-party and respondent in sexual harassment case.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding alleging sexual harassment requested orders for the production of cell phone records from both a non-party (Bell Mobility) and the individual respondent.

The Tribunal found the requested records arguably relevant to the allegations of inappropriate text messages.

The Tribunal ordered Bell Mobility to produce the applicant's records at her expense, and ordered the individual respondent to request his call logs from his provider and disclose them to the applicant.

Neary v. 1710700 Ontario Inc. o/a Ristorante Avanti, 2014 HRTO 431

Laurie Kent

10 cases2012–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 19, 2014

Union's unopposed request to intervene in an employment discrimination and reprisal application granted.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisals in employment by the respondent.

The United Food and Commercial Workers’ International Union Local 333 filed a Request to Intervene.

Neither the applicant nor the respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting that the application raises issues that may affect the union.

The Tribunal directed that the matter proceed to a three-day hearing, where the presiding adjudicator will determine the extent of the union's participation.

Murad George v. Barney River Investment Limited, 2014 HRTO 359

David A. Gourlay

37 cases2010–2026

Bruce Best

45 cases2008–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 19, 2014

Tribunal denies request to defer human rights application pending judicial review in a separate case.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the human rights application pending the outcome of a judicial review in another case concerning the interaction between s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code and the Police Services Act.

The applicant opposed the deferral and sought to amend his application to add the ground of 'sex'.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding that the potential for the law to change did not outweigh the prejudice of further delay, especially since the incidents occurred over four years prior.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to amend the application, finding it to be a simple amendment with no undue prejudice to the respondents.

Durell Claybourn v. Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 386

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2014

Human rights application dismissed for being filed outside the one-year statutory time limit without a reasonable explanation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisals more than 10 months after the one-year statutory time limit expired.

The applicant claimed the delay was in good faith because the Tribunal had allegedly instructed him to exhaust other efforts, such as his union grievance, before proceeding.

The Tribunal rejected this explanation, noting it does not provide legal advice, its jurisprudence does not support waiting for other proceedings, and the grievance process had concluded while the applicant still had time to file.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Khatri v. Kraft Foods Canada, 2014 HRTO 354

Lisa D. Belcourt

7 cases2009–2026

Angela E. Rae

11 cases1994–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2014

Tribunal grants respondent's consent request to access applicant's medical records to prepare its Response.

The respondent in a human rights application alleging disability discrimination filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking access to the applicant's personal health information in its Occupational Health and Claims Management files to prepare its Response, and an extension of time to file the Response.

The applicant consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted the requested orders.

Michelle Kungl v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2014 HRTO 335

Steve Lavender

23 cases2009–2026

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2014

Respondent granted access to applicant's medical files and extension of time to file Response.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking access to the applicant's Occupational Health and Claims Management files and an extension of time to file its Response.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that exceptional circumstances existed because privacy legislation prevented the respondent from accessing arguably relevant medical documents in its possession.

Richard Fredericks v. Toronto Transit Commission Sick Benefit Association (Incorporation), 2014 HRTO 334

Joseph Tascona

9 cases1990–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2014

Applicant ordered to disclose arguably relevant documents or face potential dismissal of human rights application.

The respondents filed a Request for an Order During Proceeding seeking to compel the applicant to disclose arguably relevant documents in accordance with Rule 16.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The applicant had failed to comply with the disclosure deadline and did not respond to the respondents' request.

The Tribunal granted the request, emphasizing the importance of document exchange and compliance with Tribunal directions.

The applicant was ordered to deliver the required documents or confirm she would not rely on further documents, failing which her application could be dismissed.

Fay v. Independent Living Services, 2014 HRTO 332

Yashoda Ranganathan

Practising Law - Employed37 cases2010–2026

Michael Alexander

11 cases2009–2025

Maria McDonald

Practising Law - Employed7 cases2000–2016

Assunta Mazzotta

In Private Practice17 cases2011–2023

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 10, 2014

Human rights applications dismissed against employer, client, and doctor; hospital accommodation claim proceeds to hearing.

The applicant filed human rights applications alleging discrimination based on race and disability, and reprisal, against his former employer (Andorra), a client of the employer (TCSCC), his former family doctor (Dr. Chiu), and a hospital (Sunnybrook).

The respondents requested that the applications be dismissed at a summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed all allegations against Andorra, the TCSCC, and Dr. Chiu, finding no evidence linking their actions to the applicant's disability or race, or establishing an intent to retaliate.

The Tribunal also dismissed the reprisal allegation against Sunnybrook.

However, the Tribunal allowed the allegation that Sunnybrook failed to accommodate the applicant's mental health needs when it forcibly removed him from the hospital to proceed to mediation and a potential merits hearing.

Falodun v. Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd., 2014 HRTO 322

Page 11 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 11 of 29 (567 cases)

Shaheen Hirani

Ken Bhattacharjee

Dombroskie v. Veyance Technologies Canada Inc., 2014 HRTO 647

Dijana Simonovic

Ken Bhattacharjee

Lugonia v. Arista Homes, 2014 HRTO 606

William T. Macco

Andrew Black

Ken Bhattacharjee

Arruda v. Brookfield Properties Management Corporation, 2014 HRTO 598

K.C. Wysynski

Ken Bhattacharjee

Patricia Baichan v. Assante Capital Management Ltd. and Dixie Allen, 2014 HRTO 592

Natasha De Menna

Glenn Christie

Barry Swadron

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sandhu v. Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 573

David J. Bannon

Ken Bhattacharjee

Edward Piatowski v. General Motors of Canada Ltd., 2014 HRTO 567

Ken Bhattacharjee

de Koning v. St. Louis Bar and Grill Cityplace, 2014 HRTO 561

Ken Bhattacharjee

Major v. V Group Call Centre, 2014 HRTO 514

Karen R. Bock

J James Nyman

Ken Bhattacharjee

Shari Sookhai v. Enbridge Gas Distribution, 2014 HRTO 478

Ken Bhattacharjee

Shi v. Holcim (Canada) Inc., 2014 HRTO 450

Ken Bhattacharjee

Kim v. The Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2014 HRTO 444

Andrea York

Ken Bhattacharjee

Pooneh Piri v. Nestle Waters Canada, 2014 HRTO 435

Claudio Martini

Ken Bhattacharjee

Neary v. 1710700 Ontario Inc. o/a Ristorante Avanti, 2014 HRTO 431

Laurie Kent

Ken Bhattacharjee

Murad George v. Barney River Investment Limited, 2014 HRTO 359

David A. Gourlay

Bruce Best

Ken Bhattacharjee

Durell Claybourn v. Toronto Police Service and Toronto Police Services Board, 2014 HRTO 386

Ken Bhattacharjee

Khatri v. Kraft Foods Canada, 2014 HRTO 354

Lisa D. Belcourt

Angela E. Rae

Ken Bhattacharjee

Michelle Kungl v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2014 HRTO 335

Steve Lavender

Ken Bhattacharjee

Richard Fredericks v. Toronto Transit Commission Sick Benefit Association (Incorporation), 2014 HRTO 334

Joseph Tascona

Ken Bhattacharjee

Fay v. Independent Living Services, 2014 HRTO 332

Yashoda Ranganathan

Michael Alexander

Maria McDonald

Assunta Mazzotta

Ken Bhattacharjee

Falodun v. Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd., 2014 HRTO 322

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira