The applicant, a transitioned female cyclist, alleged discrimination on the basis of sex regarding the imposition of anti-doping requirements as a condition of obtaining a race license.
The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdiction, timeliness, and whether to add WADA as a respondent.
The Tribunal found it had territorial jurisdiction over the UCI, as it extensively regulates the licensing process in Ontario, but not over the IOC or WADA.
The Tribunal also found the applicant's claims regarding the denial of her race licenses in 2013, 2014, and 2015 were timely as a continuing contravention, but claims regarding the Stockholm Consensus were out of time.
The request to summarily dismiss the application for lacking a reasonable prospect of success was denied.