Human rights application re-activated after substantive conclusion of related WSIAT appeal.
The applicant requested to re-activate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a WSIAT proceeding.
The WSIAT allowed the applicant's appeal regarding his workplace injury, though the precise calculation of benefits remained pending.
The respondents opposed re-activation until the benefits were calculated and also requested production of the WSIAT hearing documents.
The Tribunal granted the request to re-activate, finding the substantive WSIAT issues had concluded, eliminating the risk of inconsistent findings.
The Tribunal denied the respondents' document production request as premature and ordered the applicant to provide information regarding his bankruptcy status.
Istvan Kovarcsik v. Perpetual Properties Limited, Milton Winberg and Phillip Khetani, 2016 HRTO 1211