Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Christine Lundy, Anne Marsden, Kate Hughes.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Robert Edwards

20 cases2001–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2016

Former counsel granted limited intervenor status in preliminary hearing regarding prior settlement.

The applicant's former counsel filed a Request to Intervene in a preliminary hearing scheduled to address the respondents' request to dismiss the application as an abuse of process due to a prior settlement.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that the former counsel may have relevant information regarding the settlement.

The intervention was limited to providing oral or written submissions at the preliminary hearing.

Lac Seul v. Shibogama First Nations Council, 2016 HRTO 896

Applicant permitted to add witnesses and documents to evidence list; no prejudice to respondent found.

In an ongoing human rights application alleging failure to accommodate a disability, the applicant sought to add two witnesses (her neurologist and a co-worker) and 13 documents to her evidence list.

The respondent opposed the request as untimely and an abuse of process.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's requests, finding no abuse of process or prejudice to the respondent given the ample notice and time to respond.

The Tribunal also struck the evidence of a previously heard witness, as it was no longer relevant to the remaining issues in the case.

Pourasadi v. Bentley Leathers Inc., 2016 HRTO 879

Mindy Noble

43 cases2010–2026

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2016

Late adjournment request due to family death four months prior denied.

The respondent requested an adjournment of a hearing scheduled for one week later, citing emotional distress from the death of his son four months prior.

The applicants opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, noting that while the death of a child is tragic, a request made four months after the event and only one week before the hearing does not constitute exceptional circumstances justifying a late adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

Madkour v. Alabi, 2016 HRTO 840

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 14, 2016

Adjournment of preliminary hearing granted as an accommodation based on new medical documentation of deteriorated sight.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled preliminary hearing, having previously been denied due to insufficient medical documentation.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration alleging a reasonable apprehension of bias, which the Tribunal treated as a renewed adjournment request supported by a new letter from his treating physician.

The Tribunal found the bias allegation unfounded but granted the adjournment as an accommodation for the applicant's disability-related restrictions, based on the new medical evidence indicating his sight had deteriorated.

Free v. Municipality of Magnetawan, 2016 HRTO 806

Nansy Ghobrial

15 cases2015–2026

Nadia Lambek

5 cases2016–2017

Kate Hughes

49 cases1998–2018

Emtiaz Bala

Practising Law - Employed26 cases2009–2025

Amandi Esonwanne

21 cases2009–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 14, 2016

SIU ordered to produce witness statements but not Director's Report in human rights proceeding.

The respondents in a human rights application alleging sexual harassment and reprisal brought a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking production of the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) investigation file regarding the applicant's complaint.

The SIU opposed production of the Director's Report, an FOI request, and witness statements.

The Tribunal ordered the SIU to produce the witness statements, finding them arguably relevant to credibility and outweighing confidentiality concerns.

The Tribunal declined to order production of the Director's Report and FOI request, finding them not arguably relevant to the human rights proceeding.

McWilliam v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 801

Leah Simon

12 cases2009–2016

Andrew Ebejer

2 cases2016–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 13, 2016

Race discrimination allegations allowed to proceed to hearing; sex and family status claims dismissed.

The applicant, a student at a private career college, alleged discrimination based on race, sex, and other grounds after being removed from class and subsequently dismissed from the college.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed at a summary hearing for having no reasonable prospect of success or because a Ministry investigation had already dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations related to sex and family status, as well as general complaints about the program, for having no reasonable prospect of success.

However, the Tribunal allowed the race-related allegations regarding the applicant's removal from class and dismissal to proceed to a full hearing.

The Tribunal also declined to dismiss the application under s. 45.1 of the Code, finding that the Ministry investigation did not deal with the substance of the human rights allegations.

Bundah v. triOS College Business Technology and Health Care Inc., 2016 HRTO 796

Matthew Demeo

13 cases2013–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2016

Applicant ordered to provide detailed witness statements; one physician permitted to testify by phone.

The respondent in a human rights application filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking detailed witness statements and the production of documents referenced in the applicant's witness list.

The respondent also opposed the applicant's request to have her treating physicians testify by telephone.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide detailed witness statements and produce the referenced documents.

The Tribunal permitted one physician to testify by telephone but required the other to testify in person due to potential credibility issues.

Morrison v. Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre, 2016 HRTO 766

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2016

Tribunal sets aside dismissal of application caused by electronic case management system error.

The Tribunal reconsidered its own motion to dismiss the application as abandoned.

The applicant had filed the required pre-hearing disclosure materials, but they were not visible to the adjudicator due to an upgrade to the Tribunal's electronic case management system.

Recognizing the administrative error, the Tribunal set aside the dismissal and ordered the hearing to be rescheduled.

Michael LeBlanc v. Pro Line Recreation Sales and Service, 2016 HRTO 761

Daniel Leone

10 cases2000–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2016

Respondent breached settlement by erroneously deducting child support from general damages payment.

The applicant alleged that the respondent breached a settlement agreement by making child support deductions from the settlement monies and remitting them to the Family Responsibility Office.

The Tribunal found that the settlement monies were characterized as general damages, not income or severance, and therefore the respondent was not required to make deductions under the Family Responsibility and Support Arrears Enforcement Act.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the applicant the $2,500 that was erroneously deducted, plus interest.

Moore v. Cargill Limited, 2016 HRTO 764

Gary Melanson

6 cases2010–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2016

Most discrimination allegations in neighbour dispute dismissed for lacking service relationship or reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by his neighbours, who are a police officer and a crown attorney, and by the regional police services board.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine whether the allegations fell within the social area of services and whether they had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the property and harassment allegations against the personal respondents as they did not involve the provision of a service.

The Tribunal also dismissed the allegations against the police services board and most remaining allegations against the personal respondents for having no reasonable prospect of success, as there was no evidence linking the alleged conduct to a protected Code ground.

Only the allegation that the respondent police officer improperly ran criminal and immigration checks on the applicant was permitted to proceed to a full hearing.

Riad v. Waterloo Regional Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 739

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 30, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with Tribunal directions.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of race.

The Tribunal directed the parties to file and exchange documents and witness lists in advance of the hearing.

Neither party complied.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction warning the applicant that the application might be dismissed as abandoned if he did not file the required materials.

The applicant failed to comply or communicate with the Tribunal.

The application was dismissed as abandoned.

Michael LeBlanc v. Pro Line Recreation Sales and Service, 2016 HRTO 732

Daniel Guttman

84 cases2002–2021

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2016

Human rights application regarding special diet allowance dismissed due to lack of medical evidence.

The applicant alleged discrimination based on disability regarding the special diet allowance under Ontario's social assistance system.

Her complaint regarding fibromyalgia was previously allowed to proceed to a merits hearing based on letters from her treating physician.

However, the physician became unable to provide evidence, and the applicant could not find a replacement medical professional.

Without medical evidence to satisfy the legal test for special diet complaints, the Tribunal dismissed the application as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Hunchuk v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 728

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 26, 2016

Adjournment granted and application placed in abeyance for six months based on medical evidence.

The applicant requested a second adjournment of a summary hearing scheduled for July 11, 2016, providing a medical note indicating aggravated symptoms that made it difficult to deal with stressful matters.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment and placed the application in abeyance for six months.

Mohit Bali v. Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 720

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2016

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application granted following completion of Divisional Court appeal.

The applicant requested to re-activate his deferred human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability by the Law Society of Upper Canada.

The application had been deferred pending the resolution of an appeal to the Divisional Court.

As the Divisional Court proceeding was completed, the Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application and ordered the respondent to file a response.

David Molson v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 HRTO 712

Maria Gergin

3 cases2013–2017

Jean-Alexandre De Bousquet

In Private Practice43 cases2014–2026

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2016

Request to strike allegations as untimely denied; incidents formed a continuous series under the Code.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal dismiss portions of the applicant's human rights application as untimely, arguing they related to discrete incidents occurring more than one year prior to filing.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the allegations of harassment, poisoned work environment, reprisals, and termination shared a common theme.

The Tribunal concluded the events constituted a 'series of incidents' under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code, with the last incident occurring within the one-year limitation period.

A.D. v. L-3 Communications Electronic Systems Inc., 2016 HRTO 711

M. Elizabeth Keenan

3 cases2016–2016

Jeff Rochwerg

In Private Practice2 cases2016–2018

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2016

Adjournment request denied for lack of medical evidence; preliminary hearing issues set.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a preliminary hearing due to a medical condition, which the Tribunal denied for lack of sufficient medical documentation.

The Tribunal also dismissed the applicant's requests for production and particulars as premature.

The Tribunal directed that the preliminary hearing would address whether a personal respondent should be removed, whether a new application falls outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and whether the applicant should be declared a vexatious litigant.

Free v. Magnetawan (Municipality), 2016 HRTO 715

Nadia Lambek

5 cases2016–2017

Kate Hughes

49 cases1998–2018

Anne Cumming

5 cases2011–2025

Amandi Esonwanne

21 cases2009–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 24, 2016

Tribunal orders partial production of documents and directs submissions on admissibility of police disciplinary records.

In an interim decision following a case management meeting, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ordered the respondents to produce certain emails and texts concerning the applicant up to the date of the Application.

The Tribunal declined to order production of documents created after the Application date, noting the applicant must first seek permission to amend her Application to add allegations of continuing reprisals.

The Tribunal also directed the parties to make submissions on whether s. 83(8) of the Police Services Act precludes the production of documents from a related disciplinary proceeding.

McWilliam v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 704

Clara Matheson

16 cases2009–2017

Bryan Rubin

1 case2016–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 20, 2016

Adjournment granted due to respondent counsel's medical issue despite vague note and prejudice to applicant.

At the start of the scheduled hearing, the respondent requested an adjournment due to their counsel's alleged heart condition.

Another lawyer from the firm appeared and produced a vague medical note.

Despite serious concerns about the note and the prejudice to the applicant, whose doctor had cancelled appointments to testify, the Tribunal reluctantly granted the adjournment.

The Tribunal ordered a case management call to expeditiously reschedule the hearing and directed that the file be reassigned if counsel remained unavailable.

John Hrisofos v. Briarlane Rental Property Management Inc., 2016 HRTO 694

Susan McCorquodale

11 cases2010–2017

Lauri Reesor

23 cases2010–2026

John Field

5 cases2014–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2016

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process due to prior full and final releases.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and reprisal against his employer and several individuals.

The applicant had previously signed two settlement agreements with the corporate respondent, both containing full and final releases.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed.

The Tribunal found that proceeding with the allegations covered by the 2008 settlement would be an abuse of process, rejecting the applicant's arguments that he lacked capacity or signed under duress.

The Tribunal further held that the remaining allegations were untimely and had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal also denied the applicant's request to add Great West Life as a respondent.

The application was dismissed in its entirety.

Prakash Murugesan v. CIBC Mortgages Inc. et al., 2016 HRTO 678

Matthew Demeo

13 cases2013–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2016

Tribunal orders partial production of personnel and supervisory files based on arguable relevance.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested the production of various documents, including her complete personnel file, supervisory files, and medical files.

The respondent objected to producing the complete files, arguing they were not relevant or did not exist.

The Tribunal applied the test of arguable relevance and ordered the respondent to produce documents from the personnel and supervisory files for the specific timeframe of the alleged discrimination, as well as relevant internal job applications and Manulife files.

The request was otherwise denied.

Morrison v. Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre, 2016 HRTO 679

Page 10 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alex HenrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brandon DurantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christian FenkamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hala MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance
Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Patricia MurrayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
David SpearsCounsel
1 appearance
Dean AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas SulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Drago BanjavcicAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 10 of 39 (761 cases)

Robert Edwards

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lac Seul v. Shibogama First Nations Council, 2016 HRTO 896

Marisa Scotto di Luzio

Jodi Gallagher Healy

Jo-Anne Pickel

Pourasadi v. Bentley Leathers Inc., 2016 HRTO 879

Mindy Noble

Jo-Anne Pickel

Madkour v. Alabi, 2016 HRTO 840

Jo-Anne Pickel

Free v. Municipality of Magnetawan, 2016 HRTO 806

Nansy Ghobrial

Nadia Lambek

Kate Hughes

Emtiaz Bala

Amandi Esonwanne

Jo-Anne Pickel

McWilliam v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 801

Leah Simon

Andrew Ebejer

Jo-Anne Pickel

Bundah v. triOS College Business Technology and Health Care Inc., 2016 HRTO 796

Matthew Demeo

Jo-Anne Pickel

Morrison v. Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre, 2016 HRTO 766

Jo-Anne Pickel

Michael LeBlanc v. Pro Line Recreation Sales and Service, 2016 HRTO 761

Daniel Leone

Jo-Anne Pickel

Moore v. Cargill Limited, 2016 HRTO 764

Gary Melanson

Jo-Anne Pickel

Riad v. Waterloo Regional Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 739

Jo-Anne Pickel

Michael LeBlanc v. Pro Line Recreation Sales and Service, 2016 HRTO 732

Daniel Guttman

Jo-Anne Pickel

Hunchuk v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2016 HRTO 728

Jo-Anne Pickel

Mohit Bali v. Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 720

Jo-Anne Pickel

David Molson v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 HRTO 712

Maria Gergin

Jean-Alexandre De Bousquet

Jo-Anne Pickel

A.D. v. L-3 Communications Electronic Systems Inc., 2016 HRTO 711

M. Elizabeth Keenan

Jeff Rochwerg

Jo-Anne Pickel

Free v. Magnetawan (Municipality), 2016 HRTO 715

Nadia Lambek

Kate Hughes

Anne Cumming

Amandi Esonwanne

Jo-Anne Pickel

McWilliam v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2016 HRTO 704

Clara Matheson

Bryan Rubin

Jo-Anne Pickel

John Hrisofos v. Briarlane Rental Property Management Inc., 2016 HRTO 694

Susan McCorquodale

Lauri Reesor

John Field

Jo-Anne Pickel

Prakash Murugesan v. CIBC Mortgages Inc. et al., 2016 HRTO 678

Matthew Demeo

Jo-Anne Pickel

Morrison v. Toronto Central Community Care Access Centre, 2016 HRTO 679

Affected Party

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Respondents

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace