Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Anne Marsden, Christine Lundy, Esther del Carmen Mancebo-Munoz.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Summary hearing adjourned due to incarcerated applicant's reported medical issues, pending future medical documentation.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing on the basis that he was in custody and suffering from medical issues, including mental trauma, a recent stroke, and head injuries from an assault.

The respondent opposed the request, arguing that custody alone does not prevent participation.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment despite a lack of medical documentation, noting the unique circumstances, but warned the applicant that future requests would require medical evidence.

The hearing was rescheduled for Fall 2013.

Allen Rosario v. Thunder Bay Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 1353

Adrienne Couto

53 cases2009–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 19, 2013

Request to reactivate human rights application denied as grievance arbitration process remains ongoing.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the outcome of a grievance.

The respondent opposed the request, noting that while a return to work agreement had been negotiated, the grievance remained unresolved and was proceeding to arbitration.

The Tribunal found it inappropriate to reactivate the application while the grievance process was ongoing and directed that the application remain deferred.

Randy Merrill v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 1262

William Lemay

3 cases2013–2014

Todd Cook

1 case2013–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 18, 2013

Request to amend human rights application to add hiring discrimination allegation denied.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding requested to amend her application to include an allegation of discrimination in a hiring decision and to claim further monetary compensation for psychological damage.

The Tribunal denied the request to add the hiring decision allegation, as the applicant was already employed by the respondent at all material times.

The Tribunal deferred the request to amend the remedial claims to the adjudicator hearing the merits of the case, and denied the respondent's request to order the production of further medical records.

Bellhouse v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 1255

Keri Wilson

10 cases2005–2015

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 17, 2013

Adjournment of summary hearing denied as applicant failed to show exceptional circumstances.

The applicant, who is self-represented, requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing on the basis that she was facing resistance in obtaining personal files from the respondent and a hospital.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant had not established exceptional circumstances as required by the Practice Direction.

The Tribunal noted that no evidence would be required at the summary hearing, which was convened to address legal issues and whether there was a reasonable prospect of success, and therefore the inability to access documents did not justify an adjournment.

M.D. v. Windsor-Essex Children’s Aid Society and Rebecca Ross, 2013 HRTO 1247

John H. Gescher

3 cases1998–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 17, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the resolution of a concurrent union grievance on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The applicant's union had also filed a grievance dealing with the same subject matter.

The Tribunal directed the parties to make submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the outcome of the grievance.

Only the respondent filed submissions, noting that the grievance arbitration had commenced.

The Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions, noting that grievance arbitrators have the power and responsibility to enforce human rights statutes.

Yohanathan Kanapathipillai v. Regional Municipality of Peel, 2013 HRTO 1251

Suzanne Hunt

13 cases2011–2024

John Morand

3 cases2013–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 16, 2013

Breach of settlement application dismissed; requested materials were not covered by the settlement agreement.

The applicant filed a breach of settlement application alleging the respondent failed to provide budget committee materials free of charge, as allegedly required by their previous settlement regarding accommodation for his visual disability.

The Tribunal found that the budget committee was not among the committees specifically listed in the Minutes of Settlement.

Furthermore, the Tribunal interpreted the settlement's reference to changing 'requirements for accommodation' as applying to the applicant's disability-related needs (such as font size), not to a desire for additional free materials.

The application was dismissed.

Dietz v. Port Hope (Municipality), 2013 HRTO 1240

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 11, 2013

Summary dismissal denied; LTB did not address human rights claims and allegations had reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of race, sex, and marital status by her landlord, including harassment and eviction.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application should be dismissed.

The respondent argued the matter was already dealt with by the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB).

The Tribunal found the LTB had dismissed the applicant's claims for lack of jurisdiction over the requested remedy and did not address the human rights allegations.

The Tribunal also found the application had a reasonable prospect of success, as the applicant alleged the superintendent and property manager made explicitly discriminatory comments.

The request to dismiss the application was denied and a hearing on the merits was ordered.

Brown v. Margoma Holdings Ltd. c/o Briarlane Rental Property Management Inc., 2013 HRTO 1220

Robert W. Dowhan

2 cases2013–2013

Firdaus Walele

8 cases2010–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 11, 2013

Motion to amend human rights application granted; motion to add property manager and lawyers as respondents denied.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to amend her human rights application to add new allegations of discrimination regarding condominium common areas and parking, to increase the remedy sought, and to add the condominium's property manager and lawyers as respondents.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend the application, finding the new allegations were related to the original narrative and the amendment would not unduly prejudice the respondent.

However, the Tribunal denied the request to add the proposed respondents, as the applicant failed to provide specific allegations or facts that could support a finding that they violated the Human Rights Code.

Anne Marsden v. Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41, 2013 HRTO 1214

Louise Morel

5 cases2012–2016

Heather Cameron

4 cases2013–2017

Christian Pilon

In Private Practice50 cases2012–2025

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 11, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as untimely because it was filed beyond the one-year limitation period.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability regarding a wheelchair ramp at the respondents' premises.

The incident occurred in October 2008, but the application was not filed until December 2012.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed as untimely.

The Tribunal found that the application was filed beyond the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code and that the applicant failed to establish that the delay was incurred in good faith.

The application was dismissed.

Lewis v. CA-DO Mart Limited (c.o.b. Giant Tiger), 2013 HRTO 1208

Lucy Siraco

35 cases2000–2016

Dean Ardron

43 cases2011–2025

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 9, 2013

Reconsideration granted to reinstate application dismissed after applicant inadvertently missed teleconference hearing.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned after he failed to call into a scheduled teleconference hearing.

The applicant, a paralegal, claimed he misread the Notice of Hearing and expected to be called.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant should have read the Notice carefully, his emails sent the night before and shortly after the hearing demonstrated an intention to pursue the application.

The Tribunal granted the request for reconsideration, finding that the prejudice to the respondents was minimal.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 1196

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 9, 2013

Tribunal denies respondent's request for a five-month extension to file Response and for particulars.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of family status and ancestry after the respondent refused to rent him a hotel room because he had children.

The respondent requested a five-month extension of time to file its Response, citing renovations and peak season busyness, as well as particulars regarding two other incidents mentioned in the application.

The Tribunal denied the extension, finding that mere inconvenience does not justify a delay, and ordered the Response to be filed within 14 days.

The request for particulars was also denied because the other incidents were only mentioned to describe the effect of the alleged discrimination on the applicant and were not relevant to the Response.

Michael Lapointe v. Dewar’s Inn on the River, 2013 HRTO 1193

Ron Franklin

23 cases2009–2026

Carissa Tanzola

6 cases2011–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 4, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending outcome of concurrent WSIB appeal regarding suitable modified work.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and race-related grounds, claiming the respondent failed to accommodate his disability by transferring him to a different position.

The applicant was concurrently appealing a WSIB decision regarding the availability of suitable modified work.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application.

Applying the Calabria factors, the Tribunal found that the issues in both proceedings were substantially the same, centering on whether the respondent offered suitable work and accommodated the applicant to the point of undue hardship.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending a final decision by the WSIB Appeals Resolution Officer.

Sujnarine Samaroo v. Victaulic Company of Canada Limited, 2013 HRTO 1165

Robert Bayne

8 cases2000–2016

Matthew Fisher

3 cases2011–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2013

Human rights application reactivated on consent following withdrawal of related ESA appeal.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending an appeal under the Employment Standards Act.

The applicant withdrew her ESA appeal without prejudice to her Tribunal application, and the respondent consented to the reactivation.

The Tribunal ordered the application reactivated and directed the Registrar to schedule a two-day hearing.

Lane v. Canadian Tire Corporation Limited, 2013 HRTO 1159

Mike Hamilton

1 case2013–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2013

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as Bell Mobility is a federally-regulated employer.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment against Bell Mobility Inc. and several individuals.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the corporate respondent is a federally-regulated employer.

The applicant agreed that the claim falls within federal jurisdiction but requested a deferral pending the Canadian Human Rights Commission's determination.

The Tribunal found it plain and obvious that the employment relationship is governed by federal jurisdiction and dismissed the application.

Huk v. Bell Mobility Inc., 2013 HRTO 1155

Mathias Link

In Private Practice10 cases2009–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as respondent is a federal undertaking.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability against his employer, an interprovincial bus transit company.

The respondent brought a request to dismiss the application on the basis that its operations fall under federal jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the respondent is a federal undertaking pursuant to section 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and therefore the application falls outside provincial jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed.

Brighton v. First Canada ULC, 2013 HRTO 1156

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2013

Applicant ordered to comply with production order within 7 days or face potential dismissal.

The applicant failed to comply with a previous interim decision ordering her to provide particulars regarding a phone call and to produce her telephone records.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to file the required particulars and documents within 7 days, warning that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of her application.

The deadline for the parties' disclosure of documents and witness statements was also extended.

Larabee v. YWCA Sudbury, 2013 HRTO 1108

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 19, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to comply with disclosure obligations.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination based on disability.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to comply with pre-hearing disclosure obligations, including filing a witness list, witness statements, and documents.

The applicant failed to comply with the initial deadline and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction.

As the applicant did not file the required materials or communicate with the Tribunal, the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Marianne Gardner v. Tim Worthing, 2013 HRTO 1096

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 11, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to comply with pre-hearing disclosure directions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and reprisal.

After being granted an adjournment with conditions to provide pre-hearing disclosure by a specific date, the applicant failed to comply.

She requested a further extension citing medical reasons, which the Tribunal denied.

Due to the applicant's failure to comply with the Tribunal's directions regarding disclosure, the respondent sought to have the application dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 1039

Erin Hallock

19 cases2012–2017

Adrienne Liang

16 cases2008–2016

Adrienne Couto

53 cases2009–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2013

Consent request to amend Response to address new allegations in Reply granted.

The respondent in a human rights application requested an order to amend its Response to address new allegations raised in the applicant's Reply regarding a workplace transfer and a performance appraisal.

The applicant consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request under Rule 1.7(c), allowing the respondent to file an amended Response and setting deadlines for the amended pleadings.

Victor Adams v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 1015

Randy Ai

In Private Practice8 cases2012–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 5, 2013

Request for reconsideration dismissed as the underlying interim decisions were not final decisions.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of three previous interim decisions regarding anonymization, an adjournment, and an extension of a deadline.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the interim decisions were not final decisions that disposed of the central issues in the complaint, and therefore could not be the subject of a reconsideration request under Rule 26.1 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 1007

Page 35 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Yvonne SookdeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shelley LeachSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance
David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
Everton HayeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
William LemayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
Brent ForemanCounsel
1 appearance
John FieldCounsel
1 appearance
Ben MillardCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance
Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 35 of 39 (761 cases)

Robert Edwards

Holly A. Walbourne

Jo-Anne Pickel

Allen Rosario v. Thunder Bay Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 1353

Adrienne Couto

Jo-Anne Pickel

Randy Merrill v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 1262

William Lemay

Todd Cook

Jo-Anne Pickel

Bellhouse v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 1255

Keri Wilson

Jo-Anne Pickel

M.D. v. Windsor-Essex Children’s Aid Society and Rebecca Ross, 2013 HRTO 1247

John H. Gescher

Jo-Anne Pickel

Yohanathan Kanapathipillai v. Regional Municipality of Peel, 2013 HRTO 1251

Suzanne Hunt

John Morand

Jo-Anne Pickel

Dietz v. Port Hope (Municipality), 2013 HRTO 1240

Jo-Anne Pickel

Brown v. Margoma Holdings Ltd. c/o Briarlane Rental Property Management Inc., 2013 HRTO 1220

Robert W. Dowhan

Firdaus Walele

Jo-Anne Pickel

Anne Marsden v. Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41, 2013 HRTO 1214

Louise Morel

Heather Cameron

Christian Pilon

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lewis v. CA-DO Mart Limited (c.o.b. Giant Tiger), 2013 HRTO 1208

Lucy Siraco

Dean Ardron

Jo-Anne Pickel

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 1196

Jo-Anne Pickel

Michael Lapointe v. Dewar’s Inn on the River, 2013 HRTO 1193

Ron Franklin

Carissa Tanzola

Jo-Anne Pickel

Sujnarine Samaroo v. Victaulic Company of Canada Limited, 2013 HRTO 1165

Robert Bayne

Matthew Fisher

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lane v. Canadian Tire Corporation Limited, 2013 HRTO 1159

Mike Hamilton

Jo-Anne Pickel

Huk v. Bell Mobility Inc., 2013 HRTO 1155

Mathias Link

Jo-Anne Pickel

Brighton v. First Canada ULC, 2013 HRTO 1156

Jo-Anne Pickel

Larabee v. YWCA Sudbury, 2013 HRTO 1108

Jo-Anne Pickel

Marianne Gardner v. Tim Worthing, 2013 HRTO 1096

Jo-Anne Pickel

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 1039

Erin Hallock

Adrienne Liang

Adrienne Couto

Jo-Anne Pickel

Victor Adams v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 1015

Randy Ai

Jo-Anne Pickel

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 1007

Affected Party

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Respondents

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith