Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Christine Lundy, Anne Marsden, Kate Hughes.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Randy Ai

In Private Practice8 cases2012–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2013

Request for anonymity denied; disclosure of mental health condition did not constitute exceptional circumstances.

The applicant requested anonymity in the Tribunal's interim decisions, citing references to her mental health condition.

The respondent objected, arguing no exceptional circumstances were shown.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that human rights proceedings are presumptively open and that the disclosure of personal information regarding a disability is common and does not, on its own, justify the extraordinary measure of anonymization.

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 974

Christopher E. Taucar

6 cases2001–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2013

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing application based on adjudicative immunity denied.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing her human rights application against an arbitrator and a university.

The original decision found the arbitrator was protected by adjudicative immunity and the claim against the university had no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, finding the applicant merely sought to re-argue her case and failed to establish any new facts, conflicts with established jurisprudence, or other factors justifying reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Taucar v. The University of Western Ontario, 2013 HRTO 964

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 30, 2013

Human rights application reactivated despite late request due to confusion over WSIB decision status.

The applicant requested to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of a WSIB proceeding.

The respondent objected, arguing the request was out of time.

The Tribunal found that there had been confusion regarding the status of the WSIB decision, which had actually been issued before the application was filed.

In the absence of any asserted prejudice by the respondent, the Tribunal allowed the request and reactivated the application.

Dacosta v. Orlick Industries Ltd., 2013 HRTO 955

Kathleen Stokes

13 cases2008–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 29, 2013

Tribunal orders production of applicant's phone records and location details but denies disclosure of abuser's name.

The applicant, a transsexual woman, alleged discrimination based on sex after being denied access to the respondent's women's shelter and being asked inappropriate personal questions.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed production requests from both parties.

Applying the arguable relevance test, the Tribunal ordered the applicant to produce particulars regarding her location, the device used to record the phone call, and her phone records, but declined to order disclosure of her alleged abuser's name due to safety concerns.

The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's request for the respondent's employee's name and found the respondent had provided sufficient particulars regarding its practices.

Jessica Larabee v. YWCA Sudbury, 2013 HRTO 947

Randy Ai

In Private Practice8 cases2012–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 27, 2013

Request for extension of deadlines denied; financial inability to retain counsel is not an exceptional circumstance.

The applicant requested a further extension of deadlines set out in a previous interim decision, citing an inability to afford a lawyer.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that financial concerns relating to the retention of counsel do not constitute exceptional circumstances warranting an adjournment.

The applicant was ordered to file her witness list and statements by the original deadline, failing which her application may be dismissed.

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 919

Adjournment request denied as late retention of counsel is not an exceptional circumstance; bifurcation granted.

The applicant requested a second adjournment of the hearing, citing late retention of counsel due to financial constraints and mental health issues.

The respondents opposed the adjournment but consented to bifurcating the hearing.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, noting that financial inability to retain counsel and the stated mental health issues did not constitute exceptional circumstances warranting an adjournment, especially given the Tribunal's institutional interest in managing resources.

However, the Tribunal granted the alternative request to bifurcate the hearing and disclosure process between liability and remedy.

Mohammad-Zadeh v. Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc., 2013 HRTO 894

Lucy Siraco

35 cases2000–2016

Dean Ardron

43 cases2011–2025

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 22, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to attend the scheduled teleconference hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A teleconference hearing was scheduled to address the respondents' request to dismiss the application.

Despite receiving proper notice and communicating with the Tribunal shortly before the hearing, the applicant failed to attend the teleconference.

In the absence of the applicant or any explanation for his failure to attend, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Williams v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 881

Tyler Inkster

In Private Practice6 cases2010–2020

Andrea Wobick

41 cases2009–2025

Allyson M. Fischer

In Private Practice29 cases2003–2023

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Adjournment request denied; late retention of counsel is not an exceptional circumstance.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing on the basis that she was still seeking legal counsel, having retained counsel only two weeks prior to the hearing.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the late retention of counsel did not constitute an exceptional circumstance warranting an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

The applicant was ordered to file the required hearing materials within seven days.

Mohammad-Zadeh v. Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc., 2013 HRTO 855

Randy Ai

In Private Practice8 cases2012–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Adjournment granted due to medical evidence explaining applicant's delay in retaining counsel.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing due to serious mood and anxiety disorders that impaired her ability to retain counsel.

The respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that a letter from the applicant's psychiatrist explaining the delay and confirming she had retained a lawyer constituted exceptional circumstances.

The Tribunal imposed conditions to minimize prejudice to the respondent and ensure the expeditious resolution of the application.

Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 862

Garth M. Kidd

2 cases2013–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related WSIB proceeding regarding workplace injury accommodation.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the human rights application pending the result of a proceeding at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB).

The applicant opposed the deferral, arguing the issues were significantly different.

The Tribunal found that while the issues were not identical, there was significant overlap regarding the nature of the applicant's disabilities and whether the employer met its duty to accommodate.

The Tribunal deferred the application until the WSIB proceeding is complete.

Darrell Soulliere v. Mucci-Pac Ltd., 2013 HRTO 858

Paul Lalonde

2 cases2013–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2013

Application withdrawn without conditions; respondent may raise timeliness objections if allegations are re-filed.

The applicant sought to withdraw her human rights application due to a family emergency requiring her to travel abroad.

The respondent requested that the withdrawal be granted 'with prejudice' to filing a new application, noting the impending expiry of the one-year limitation period under s. 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal granted the withdrawal without terms, holding that any timeliness objections could be raised if the applicant attempted to re-file the allegations in the future.

Razia Zaman v. CLV Group Inc., 2013 HRTO 842

Jeanine Watt

6 cases2012–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2013

Tribunal grants respondent's request for particulars and extends time to file Response.

The respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking particulars regarding the applicant's claims of discrimination based on disability and family status, as well as an extension of time to file its Response.

The applicant opposed the request, arguing the Application contained sufficient particulars.

The Tribunal granted the respondent's request, finding the particulars sought related to key information reasonably required to file a full Response, and extended the deadline for the Response.

Carolyn Valmassoi v. Canadian Electrocoating Ltd., 2013 HRTO 812

Adrienne Liang

16 cases2008–2016

Adrienne Couto

53 cases2009–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievances on the same facts.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of disability for failure to accommodate a workplace injury.

The applicant also filed two grievances with her union regarding the same facts.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer, and the respondent agreed.

The Tribunal deferred the application pending the resolution of the concurrent grievance proceedings to avoid inconsistent decisions.

Newell v. Liquor Control Board of Ontario, 2013 HRTO 822

Ted Kovacs

29 cases1996–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2013

Respondent ordered to produce all of the applicant's performance evaluations as they are arguably relevant.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking the production of her performance evaluations from all departments.

The respondent agreed to provide the documents but the applicant claimed she did not receive all of them.

The Tribunal found the requested performance evaluations arguably relevant to the applicant's claim of harassment and ordered the respondent to produce any remaining evaluations.

McNeil v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 815

Christine LeBlanc

6 cases2010–2014

Beth Walden

16 cases2012–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2013

Deferral request denied as the moving party provided no particulars regarding the pending WSIB claim.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the human rights application pending the result of a proceeding at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB).

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment based on disability, specifically harassment and failure to accommodate.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request because the respondent provided no particulars as to the substance or status of any pending WSIB claim.

Robert Tuck v. The Governing Council of the Salvation Army, 2013 HRTO 766

Beth Walden

16 cases2012–2017

Augusto Palombi

3 cases2012–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2013

Human rights application alleging failure to hire due to vocal disability dismissed.

The applicant alleged that the respondents discriminated against her on the basis of disability by failing to hire her for a front desk clerk position due to a vocal cord condition.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant established a prima facie case of discrimination, the respondents provided a credible, non-discriminatory explanation for their hiring decision.

The respondents had previously offered to cross-train the applicant for the front desk, and the successful candidate was considered more suitable for the position.

The application was dismissed.

Delavalle v. Waterfront Inn (Sault) Ltd., 2013 HRTO 773

Richard Nixon

23 cases1983–2016

Erin Hallock

19 cases2012–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 8, 2013

Tribunal orders production of arguably relevant WSIB and medical records with applicant's consent.

In an interim decision regarding production requests, the Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide written consent for the disclosure of her WSIB file and personal health information in the respondents' possession.

The Tribunal found that sections 59(6) and 181(3) of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act do not bar disclosure when the employee consents.

The Tribunal also ordered the applicant to produce medical records related to her injuries and ability to work, finding them arguably relevant to the issues of accommodation and remedy, but declined to order production of her entire medical history.

Kenlen George v. Tinnerman Palnut Engineered Products (Canada) Corp., 2013 HRTO 765

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 7, 2013

Adjournment request denied as applicant failed to show exceptional circumstances or recent change in chronic medical condition.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing, citing chronic mood and anxiety disorders that impaired her ability to prepare and retain counsel.

The respondent opposed the request, arguing it was a delay tactic and would cause prejudice.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding that the applicant's medical condition was chronic and she failed to explain any recent change that would justify an adjournment just days before the hearing.

The applicant was permitted to testify without filing a witness statement.

Esther del Carmen Mancebo-Munoz v. NCO Financial Services Inc., 2013 HRTO 758

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Human rights application dismissed summarily as allegations of discrimination and reprisal had no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability and reprisal after the respondents barred him from their employment centre and contacted the police.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's behaviour was threatening and that there was no evidence linking the respondents' actions to a protected ground or an intention to reprise.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Stewart v. Employment Hamilton, 2013 HRTO 718

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 24, 2013

Request to remove individual respondent denied as her alleged discriminatory conduct is a central issue.

The respondents requested the removal of the individual respondent as a party to the human rights application.

The applicant alleged discrimination in educational services based on race, colour, ancestry, and ethnic origin.

The Tribunal applied the factors from Persaud v. Toronto District School Board and found that the alleged conduct of the individual respondent was a central issue in the case.

The Tribunal concluded that the nature of the alleged conduct could make it appropriate to award a remedy specifically against the individual respondent if an infringement is found.

The request to remove the individual respondent was denied.

Grace Ren v. International Alliance of Healthcare Educators/Upledger Institute, 2013 HRTO 685

Page 36 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alex HenrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brandon DurantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christian FenkamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hala MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance
Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Patricia MurrayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
David SpearsCounsel
1 appearance
Dean AdemaCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas SulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Drago BanjavcicAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance
Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 36 of 39 (761 cases)