Who is Jo-Anne Pickel?

Jo-Anne Pickel is a adjudicator at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Jo-Anne Pickel sit on?

Jo-Anne Pickel sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Jo-Anne Pickel decide?

Jo-Anne Pickel's most common areas include Human Rights (761 decisions), Administrative Law (313 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (152 decisions). Jo-Anne Pickel has handled 761 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Jo-Anne Pickel made?

Jo-Anne Pickel has 761 decisions on record from 2012 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Jo-Anne Pickel?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jo-Anne Pickel include Anne Marsden, Christine Lundy, Esther del Carmen Mancebo-Munoz.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jo-Anne Pickel — Adjudicator

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Health Law

Indigenous Legal Issues

Family and Matrimonial Law

Jo-Anne Pickel

Adjudicator·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2012

761

cases · 6 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 592Adjudicator· 80Vice-chair· 69Adjudicator· 18Vice- Chair· 1Vice-présidente· 1

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2013

Application against four personal respondents dismissed for failing to allege specific acts of discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment against an organizational respondent and five personal respondents.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding four of the personal respondents because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination by them.

Applying the Persaud framework, the Tribunal found no compelling reason to continue the proceeding against the four individuals, as the organizational respondent would be liable for their actions taken in the course of employment.

The application against the four personal respondents was dismissed, and the parties were directed to address whether the remaining application should be deferred or dismissed under section 45.1 of the Code due to an ongoing or concluded union grievance.

Kanapathipillai v. Peel (Municipality), 2013 HRTO 657

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment based on disability, ancestry, and place of origin, as well as a failure to accommodate.

The applicant's union had also filed grievances regarding his suspension and dismissal based on the same facts.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of the concurrent grievance proceeding.

Despite the applicant's objections regarding his union's representation, the Tribunal deferred the application, noting the substantial overlap in facts and issues and the grievance arbitrator's jurisdiction to apply human rights law.

Ftaich v. Conseil Scolaire Viamonde, 2013 HRTO 656

Jessica Young

8 cases2012–2015

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 18, 2013

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as substance was dealt with in prior proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on disability against her employer and several individuals.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the substance of the allegations had already been dealt with in a grievance arbitration and a professional discipline complaint to the College of Nurses of Ontario.

The Tribunal found that the College of Nurses appropriately dealt with the allegations regarding discriminatory comments, and the grievance arbitration appropriately dealt with the reprisal allegations regarding work assignments.

The application was dismissed in its entirety to prevent relitigation.

Hillier v. Benteler Automotive Canada Corporation, 2013 HRTO 655

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 17, 2013

Human rights application dismissed due to applicant's failure to provide respondent's correct address.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination because of sex.

The Tribunal was unable to contact the respondent at the address provided.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a correct address for the respondent or explain the steps taken to verify the address.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's direction.

As a result, the application was dismissed pursuant to Rule 6.6(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc., 2013 HRTO 642

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 15, 2013

Human rights application alleging reprisal dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to notice.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment contrary to the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, directing the applicant to provide submissions.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

McNall v. CTS Canadian Career College, 2013 HRTO 622

Human rights application dismissed; external investigator protected by adjudicative immunity and University reasonably relied on report.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that an external investigator (the Swan respondents) discriminated against her in preparing a report on her workplace harassment complaint, and that the University discriminated against her by relying on that report.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application had a reasonable prospect of success and whether adjudicative immunity applied.

The Tribunal found that the Swan respondents acted as neutral, quasi-judicial decision-makers and were therefore protected by the doctrine of adjudicative immunity.

The Tribunal also found that the claim against the University had no reasonable prospect of success because the University reasonably relied on the investigator's report, which had not been quashed on judicial review.

The application was dismissed.

Taucar v. University of Western Ontario, 2013 HRTO 597

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 8, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned due to applicant's failure to comply with disclosure obligations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability, family status, race, colour, ethnic origin, and ancestry.

The applicant failed to comply with pre-hearing disclosure obligations under the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure and ignored a subsequent Case Assessment Direction to file the required materials.

Consequently, the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Mills v. Alexandra Karmiris Pharmacy, 2013 HRTO 572

Brenda Bowlby

67 cases1984–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 4, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A summary hearing was scheduled by teleconference, and notice was delivered to the applicant's representative.

Neither the applicant nor her representative attended the hearing.

In the absence of any explanation for their failure to attend, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Crystal Haas v. District School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 542

Kiel Ardal

In Private Practice10 cases2013–2019

Clara Matheson

16 cases2009–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 2, 2013

Applications against individual and housing co-operative consolidated due to interrelated facts and public interest.

The applicant requested that her human rights application against an individual respondent for alleged discriminatory remarks be consolidated with a fresh application against her housing co-operative for failing to investigate the remarks and for vicarious liability.

The co-operative opposed the consolidation, arguing the applications raised distinct issues and would cause prejudice.

The Tribunal applied the Lattey factors and granted the consolidation, finding that the applications raised interrelated facts and issues, and that consolidation would serve the public interest by avoiding a multiplicity of proceedings without causing significant prejudice to the respondents.

Carreiro v. Borden, 2013 HRTO 534

Brian R. Gatien

8 cases1982–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2013

Applicant permitted to amend human rights application to add particulars; premature document production request denied.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding alleging disability discrimination and reprisal filed two requests for orders during proceedings.

The first request sought to add a narrative document to his application, which the Tribunal granted as an amendment to the pleadings because it provided necessary particulars.

The second request sought production of various employment and phone records.

The Tribunal dismissed the production request because the applicant failed to establish the arguable relevance of the documents, though he was granted leave to renew the request after the respondent complied with its overdue initial disclosure obligations.

Joseph Tisseur v. Rahn Plastics Inc., 2013 HRTO 495

Lorenzo Lisi

In Private Practice16 cases1993–2016

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 22, 2013

Deferral request denied as WSIB claim regarding injury cause did not overlap with accommodation issues.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the human rights application pending the outcome of the applicant's WSIB claim.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment based on disability, specifically failure to accommodate, reduction in hourly rate, and assignment of work exceeding physical restrictions.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding that the issues before the WSIB (the cause of the injury) did not sufficiently overlap with the human rights issues (the duty to accommodate regardless of cause).

Ridsdale v. Alba Transport Trailer Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 487

William Lemay

3 cases2013–2014

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2013

Request to amend human rights application granted; requests for early disclosure of particulars denied as premature.

The applicant in a human rights proceeding alleging failure to accommodate a workplace injury brought two requests for orders during proceedings.

She sought to amend her application to add allegations of reprisal and further instances of failure to accommodate, and requested particulars and documents from the respondent.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, finding the new allegations related to the original narrative and were not unduly delayed.

The Tribunal denied the requests for particulars and documents as premature, noting that the deadline for disclosure under the Tribunal's Rules had not yet passed.

Bellhouse v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 414

Piper Henderson

10 cases2011–2016

Christopher Dunn

5 cases2013–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2013

Human rights application alleging reprisal through job elimination dismissed for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged that his employer and union discriminated and reprised against him by eliminating a position for which he had successfully bid.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found no reasonable prospect that the applicant could prove the employer eliminated the position as a reprisal for a previous human rights complaint, as the employer provided a legitimate explanation that the position was temporary and another employee was also affected.

The allegations against the union president were dismissed as untimely and lacking a reasonable prospect of success.

The application was dismissed.

Lawrence v. Chrysler Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 398

Michael Klug

28 cases1992–2024

Jeanine Watt

6 cases2012–2013

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2013

Summary hearing dismisses untimely and union-related claims but allows termination claim against employer to proceed.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of disability, marital status, and family status by her former employer and union following her termination for innocent absenteeism.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations relating to incidents from 2009 and 2010 as untimely.

The Tribunal also dismissed the allegations against the union, finding no reasonable prospect of success as there was no evidence the union's actions were based on discriminatory factors.

However, the Tribunal declined to dismiss the timely allegations against the employer regarding the termination, finding that a prior settlement agreement between the union and employer did not appropriately deal with the substance of the human rights claim because the applicant was not a party to it.

Valmassoi v. Canadian Electrocoating Ltd., 2013 HRTO 401

Robert Edwards

20 cases2001–2022

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2013

Tribunal prohibits applicant from hand-delivering documents to opposing counsel but denies broad injunctive relief.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondent police services board.

Both parties filed multiple requests for orders during proceedings.

The respondent sought to restrain the applicant from certain conduct, including hand-delivering documents to its counsel's office, and to strike the applicant's response for uncivil language.

The applicant sought to restrain the respondent from intimidating him.

The Tribunal granted the respondent's request to prohibit hand delivery of documents due to safety concerns, but denied the other requests for broad injunctive relief, noting it lacks general injunctive powers over parties' interactions outside the Tribunal process.

The Tribunal also warned the applicant about his use of inflammatory language and directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the applicant's parallel criminal trial.

Rosario v. Thunder Bay Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 392

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The Tribunal had previously denied the applicant's request for an adjournment and confirmed the hearing would proceed.

After waiting 30 minutes for the applicant to appear or communicate with the Tribunal, the adjudicator dismissed the application as abandoned.

Nandram Kissoon v. Canada Catering Cleaning and Tom Hurst, 2013 HRTO 370

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 4, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the outcome of a related WSIB appeal involving overlapping issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability regarding modified duties and termination of employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer consideration of the application pending the outcome of the applicant's related appeal before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB).

Finding considerable overlap in the issues, including whether the respondent offered suitable work and accommodated the applicant to the point of undue hardship, the Tribunal ordered the application deferred until the WSIB Appeals Resolution Officer issues a final decision.

Dacosta v. Orlick Industries Ltd., 2013 HRTO 365

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 1, 2013

Adjournment request denied as lack of legal representation does not constitute exceptional circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing, scheduled to commence in a few days, because the Human Rights Legal Support Centre was unable to represent him due to a mix-up with his documents.

The respondents opposed the request.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding that the applicant's circumstances did not amount to exceptional circumstances, as self-representation is common and the applicant failed to act diligently in seeking the adjournment.

The Tribunal also granted the applicant's union observer status and the right to make submissions on matters impacting the bargaining unit.

Kissoon v. Canada Catering Cleaning, 2013 HRTO 356

Sarah A. Eves

9 cases1994–2017

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 28, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of union grievance raising the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, failure to accommodate, and harassment by the respondent employer.

Subsequently, the applicant's union filed a grievance on his behalf raising the same issues.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the outcome of the grievance process.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding that proceeding with the application could lead to inconsistent decisions, and deferred the matter pending the completion of the grievance process.

Sambhi v. Canadian Blood Service, 2013 HRTO 352

Thomas Agnew

3 cases2013–2015

Jo-Anne Pickel

HRTO0 cases2012–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2013

Tribunal denies deferral to ESA claim but removes personal respondents from human rights application.

The respondents requested that the human rights application be deferred pending the outcome of the applicant's Employment Standards Act claim, and that two personal respondents be removed from the proceeding.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, finding minimal factual overlap between the ESA claim for termination pay and the human rights claim for failure to accommodate and reprisal.

The Tribunal granted the request to remove the personal respondents, as they were acting within the scope of their employment and the corporate respondent accepted vicarious liability.

The Tribunal also accepted the applicant's late-filed materials in the absence of prejudice.

Herbert v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc., 2013 HRTO 321

Page 37 of 39 (761 cases)

Affected Party

Christine DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

Applicant

Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Helene GodinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gang RongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gregory VezinaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marie-Paule Driggs JerezSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ade OlumideSelf-represented
1 appearance
John WoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Yvonne SookdeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Constantine BassisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allen Christopher RosarioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Laura BurchSelf-represented
1 appearance
A.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lee ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcia Marla ThomasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allison ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shelley LeachSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everton HayeSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Yuce BaykaraCounsel
1 appearance
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher StienburgCounsel
1 appearance
Domenic SeverinoCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Margaret ParsonsCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Alix HerberCounsel
1 appearance

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

Jasmina Mrkalj-SkellyCounsel
1 appearance

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

Christina BorgesAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Frida De PazAgent
1 appearance

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

Christopher DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

Jonathan LisusCounsel
1 appearance

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

Holly BryceCounsel
1 appearance

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

Gordon WoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

Wade PoziomkaCounsel
1 appearance

for Fera Zubaidy

Fera ZubaidySelf-represented
1 appearance

for First Canada ULC

Mathias LinkCounsel
1 appearance

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

Connie VernonCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Marnie CorboldCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Gabriela Olguin de CoptoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Harry FineSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hudson Bay Company, Owen Baker, and Bryan Marville

William AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 303 and Peter Wall

Ron LebiCounsel
1 appearance

for Kenneth Swan and Kenneth P. Swan Arbitration Ltd.

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for KPMG Inc., Court Appointed Monitor

Dev CoossaAgent
1 appearance
Maxime CodereAgent
1 appearance

for Leon Rideout

Piper HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc.

Misha WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Luxottica Retail Canada Inc. c.o.b. as LensCrafters

Cherrine ChowCounsel
1 appearance

for Major League Baseball

Markus KoehnenCounsel
1 appearance

for Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority

Stephanie N. JeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Midland Service Ontario Centre, Corporation of the Municipality of Midland, and HGR Graham Partners LLP

Andrew MaeCounsel
1 appearance

for Nadine Dobro, Catherine Lyons, Kasha McDougall, Melissa Maya, Jessica Wake and Aldene Thomas

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

for Paragon Security

Daniel ChodosCounsel
1 appearance
David WhittenCounsel
1 appearance

for Rogers Communications Inc.

Kent ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Terra Nova Transport Ltd.

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for Thames Emergency Medical Services

Paula RusakCounsel
1 appearance

for The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Parties

Susan CrawfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Vicky RamsayCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
Thom YachninCounsel
1 appearance
Derron VernonUnion representative
1 appearance
Katrina PeddleCounsel
1 appearance
John EvansCounsel
1 appearance
Victoria HannahUnion representative
1 appearance
John GormanUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Person

Adrienne LiangUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Association

Jeffrey HewittCounsel
1 appearance

for the Amherstburg Police Service Board

Edward PosliffCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Anne MarsdenSelf-represented
8 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
8 appearances
Esther del Carmen Mancebo-MunozSelf-represented
6 appearances
Kate HughesCounsel
6 appearances
Brenda CulbertCounsel
6 appearances
Jordan LesterCounsel
5 appearances
Solomon FaganSelf-represented
5 appearances
Nadia LambekCounsel
5 appearances
Prakash MurugesanSelf-represented
5 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
4 appearances
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
4 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
4 appearances
M.D.Self-represented
4 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
3 appearances
Jamillah MensahAgent
3 appearances
Dan GonderAgent
3 appearances
Everton HayeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Nicole SimesCounsel
3 appearances
David FreeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Vincent SinclairSelf-represented
3 appearances

for the Applicants

David WrightCounsel
3 appearances
Anton BonniciSelf-represented
2 appearances
Catherine Gleason-MercierCounsel
2 appearances
Mindy NobleCounsel
1 appearance
Roger LoveCounsel
1 appearance
Grace VaccarelliCounsel
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance
Cecilia MonaghanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anton BonniciAgent
1 appearance
Lisa TrianoCounsel
1 appearance
Christine GeneraoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris PereraSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Canadian Soccer Association

Joseph ArvayCounsel
2 appearances
Sean HernCounsel
2 appearances
Catherine Boies ParkerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Anne MarinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Jason LockwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sarah HormuzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn HedrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna SalmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emanuel NavaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eric FroudeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Salnave Saint-BonheurSelf-represented
1 appearance
John JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karen DaweSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jo-Ann MacConnellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ritva SaundersAgent
1 appearance
Lisa ZukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donna GlazewskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Suzanne HunchukSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen PennellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the County of Renfrew Ontario Works and United Counties of Leeds and Grenville Ontario Works

Stephen MenardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
2 appearances

for the Interested Party

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance
Brian GreenspanAgent
1 appearance

for the Interested Party, Medisys

Brian GreenspanCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener, Office of the Employer Adviser

David BorwickAgent
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Michael GlocknerAgent
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Dean ArdronCounsel
3 appearances
Anne CummingCounsel
2 appearances
Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Sunil GurmukhCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Robert WhillansCounsel
1 appearance
Denise WorkunSelf-represented
1 appearance
Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
1 appearance
Don PyperCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Community and Social Services

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Macdonald AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Daniel AttwellCounsel
1 appearance
Sid KnowlesSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
2 appearances
Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance
Bryan A. CarrollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent BFI Constructors Ltd.

Christopher LaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Carmen Sacco

Ramon V. AndalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc.

Anna Maria MoscardelliAgent
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent/Intervenor

Joshua PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent Sears Canada Inc.

Stephanie WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent The Active Group

Robert W. DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board

Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
6 appearances
Julie O’DonnellCounsel
5 appearances
Dan GuttmanCounsel
5 appearances
Brandin O’ConnorCounsel
5 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
4 appearances
Chantelle BrysonCounsel
4 appearances
Randy AiCounsel
4 appearances
Matthew DemeoCounsel
3 appearances
Jodi Gallagher HealyCounsel
3 appearances
Robert CharneyCounsel
3 appearances
Scott WilliamsCounsel
3 appearances
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
3 appearances
Yola VentrescaCounsel
3 appearances
Stephanie YoungCounsel
3 appearances
John FieldCounsel
3 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
3 appearances
Leah SimonCounsel
3 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
3 appearances
William LemayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondents SimpsonWigle LLP, John M. Wigle and Firdaus H. Walele

Firdaus WaleleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angelo Costa

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants de l’Ontario

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens

Lise LeducCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Board of Directors of the Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K. C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CA-DO Mart Limited

Heather CameronCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Electrocoating Ltd.

Jeanine WattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent CIBC Mortgages Inc.

John FieldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Conseil des écoles publiques de l’Est de l’Ontario

Sébastien LorquetCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Controlex Corporation

Jonathan RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Danny Weill

Suzy KauffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Davis Henderson Limited Partnership by its general partner Davis Henderson G.P. Inc.

Allyson M. FischerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fédération Internationale de Football Association

Jérôme ValckeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gestion Rodaki Inc.

Louise MorelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

K.C. WysynskiCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Heidi Kessler and Intervenor Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4400

Tim GleasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent International Olympic Committee

Ronald SlaghtCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Laura Borden

Laura BordenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent, London Life Insurance Company

Sonya ClarkCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Manna Foods Inc.

Anita LandryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Robert BayneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent mdBriefcase Inc.

Mark FletcherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Finance

Pauline KwanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent MS Employment Consultants Ltd.

Jasmin MarcosAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP

Susanne SviergulaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Danny KastnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Peter Nguyen

Jean-Pierre UngCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Raheel Irfan

Tyler InksterCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Rogers Blue Jays Baseball Partnership dba Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc.

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
6 appearances
Angela RaeCounsel
5 appearances
Robert EdwardsCounsel
3 appearances
Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Gerald J. GriffithsCounsel
2 appearances
Kerri KitchuraCounsel
2 appearances
Mélissa LacroixCounsel
2 appearances
Rita BairosAgent
2 appearances
Kathryn BirdCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn DunlopCounsel
2 appearances
Vincent PanettaCounsel
2 appearances
Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
2 appearances
M. Elizabeth KeenanCounsel
2 appearances
Keri WilsonCounsel
2 appearances
Robert AtkinsonCounsel
2 appearances
Christian VernonCounsel
2 appearances
Brent ForemanCounsel
1 appearance
John FieldCounsel
1 appearance
Ben MillardCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Brian Etheridge and Anita Etheridge

Anita EtheridgeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Sehwan Oh

Jacqueline LukshaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Ontario Cycling Association and Cycling Canada Cyclisme

Albert FormosaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Joseph’s Health Centre Toronto

Stephanie YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent St. Michael’s Hospital

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Local 879

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Active Group

Robert DowhanCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The Athletic Club (Trainyards) Inc.

Brian MacDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ticketmaster Canada LP

Stuart SvonkinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heather CrispCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Union Cycliste Internationale

Nicolas ValticosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Waterloo Regional Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Weston Bakeries Ltd.

Kate DeardenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Third Party

Emtiaz BalaCounsel
1 appearance
Nansy GhobrialCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union Cycliste Internationale

Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Jesse EldersCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Western Ontario

Barry BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for the World Anti-Doping Agency

Pamela HrickCounsel
1 appearance
Brian GoverCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board

Michele BradyCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1000A

Elichai ShaffirCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne Galley

Harry BlackCounsel
1 appearance

litigation guardian for the Applicant

Ashisha PersaudAgent
1 appearance

Representative

Glynis NicholsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Adrien IafrateCounsel
1 appearance
John AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Landon YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Nini JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas McRaeCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Richard BlairCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Jonathan SchofieldAgent
1 appearance

Self-represented

Zoran BackovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
John GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance

761

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

12.5

cases/mo

HRTO761(100%)

Decision types

motion

730

trial

Page 37 of 39 (761 cases)

Jo-Anne Pickel

Kanapathipillai v. Peel (Municipality), 2013 HRTO 657

Jo-Anne Pickel

Ftaich v. Conseil Scolaire Viamonde, 2013 HRTO 656

Jessica Young

Jo-Anne Pickel

Hillier v. Benteler Automotive Canada Corporation, 2013 HRTO 655

Jo-Anne Pickel

Chartier v. Allard Interior Systems Inc., 2013 HRTO 642

Jo-Anne Pickel

McNall v. CTS Canadian Career College, 2013 HRTO 622

David C. Moore

Christopher E. Taucar

Barry Brown

Jo-Anne Pickel

Taucar v. University of Western Ontario, 2013 HRTO 597

Jo-Anne Pickel

Mills v. Alexandra Karmiris Pharmacy, 2013 HRTO 572

Brenda Bowlby

Jo-Anne Pickel

Crystal Haas v. District School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 542

Kiel Ardal

Clara Matheson

Jo-Anne Pickel

Carreiro v. Borden, 2013 HRTO 534

Brian R. Gatien

Jo-Anne Pickel

Joseph Tisseur v. Rahn Plastics Inc., 2013 HRTO 495

Lorenzo Lisi

Jo-Anne Pickel

Ridsdale v. Alba Transport Trailer Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 487

William Lemay

Jo-Anne Pickel

Bellhouse v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 414

Piper Henderson

Christopher Dunn

Jo-Anne Pickel

Lawrence v. Chrysler Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 398

Michael Klug

Jeanine Watt

Jo-Anne Pickel

Valmassoi v. Canadian Electrocoating Ltd., 2013 HRTO 401

Robert Edwards

Jo-Anne Pickel

Rosario v. Thunder Bay Police Services Board, 2013 HRTO 392

Jo-Anne Pickel

Nandram Kissoon v. Canada Catering Cleaning and Tom Hurst, 2013 HRTO 370

Patricia G. Murray

Jo-Anne Pickel

Dacosta v. Orlick Industries Ltd., 2013 HRTO 365

Jo-Anne Pickel

Kissoon v. Canada Catering Cleaning, 2013 HRTO 356

Sarah A. Eves

Jo-Anne Pickel

Sambhi v. Canadian Blood Service, 2013 HRTO 352

Thomas Agnew

Jo-Anne Pickel

Herbert v. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc., 2013 HRTO 321

Affected Party

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the Respondents

for 0825859 B.C. Ltd (d.b.a. Four Seasons Hotel Toronto)

for 1900119 Ontario Inc. o/a The Augusta House and 1892499 Ontario o/a The Pheasant Plucker

for A-1 Personnel Resources Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Black & MacDonald Limited, Net Electric Inc., Plan Group Inc. and The Roberts Group Inc.

for Chrysler Canada Inc., Rick Marshall and Dave Wallace

for Cleveland Indians Baseball Company Limited Partnership

for Corporation of the Municipality of Penetanguishene

for Ecuhome Corporation, Jacqueline Beckford, Barry Espin, Sally Murphy, Bruse Sexsmith

for Family Chiropractic Centre and Dr. Scott Huehn

for Fera Zubaidy

for First Canada ULC

for Halton Condominium Corporation No. 41

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Attorney General (Court Services Division)

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services

for herself

for himself