Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2011

Human rights application reactivated; union intervention granted; early production of video surveillance denied as premature.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination based on disability.

The application had been deferred pending an OLRB proceeding, which was subsequently withdrawn.

The Tribunal reactivated the application and granted the union's request to intervene.

The applicant's request for early production of video surveillance was denied as premature, as no Confirmation of Hearing had been issued.

The Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed because the applicant had signed a full and final release.

Jones v. No Frills Malloch’s 3928, 2011 HRTO 955

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2011

Tribunal amends respondent name, grants union intervener status, and orders submissions on preliminary objections.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of perceived disability.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal granted the applicant's request to amend the respondent's name to the Toronto Police Services Board.

The Tribunal also granted the applicant's union, the Toronto Police Senior Officers' Organization, intervener status.

Finally, the Tribunal directed the parties to provide written submissions regarding the respondent's request to dismiss parts of the application for delay and lack of jurisdiction.

Shirley Ziemendorf v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 947

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Personal respondent removed and corporate employer substituted in disability discrimination application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, naming her former store area manager as the sole personal respondent.

The respondent filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to remove the personal respondent and substitute the corporate employer.

The Tribunal applied the Persaud factors and granted the request, finding that the allegations pertained to the personal respondent acting in the course of her employment, the corporate employer was a proper substitute potentially liable for the alleged violations, and there was no compelling reason to continue against the personal respondent.

Fry v. Running Room Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 928

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Preliminary request to dismiss human rights application denied as premature; request to amend deferred.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the respondent's long-term disability policy discriminated against her on the basis of disability due to a pre-existing condition exclusion.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed on a preliminary basis, arguing lack of jurisdiction and a statutory exemption under section 22 of the Code.

The applicant requested to amend the application to add the social area of employment.

The Tribunal denied the respondent's request to dismiss, finding it premature to evaluate the substantive defences at a preliminary stage.

The Tribunal also deferred the applicant's request to amend to the hearing on the merits, as it required an assessment of facts and evidence regarding the insurance policy and employment relationship.

Elizabeth Long v. Co-Operators Life Insurance Company, 2011 HRTO 940

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Tribunal declines to dismiss human rights application at preliminary stage, finding jurisdiction not plainly lacking.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, colour, place of origin, and ethnic origin, claiming he was terminated while on probation following altercations with co-workers.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the application appeared to lack specific acts of discrimination.

After receiving the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction and directed that the application continue to be processed.

Tharmasuthaharan Tharmaratnam v. The Miller Group, 2011 HRTO 939

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Union granted intervenor status; parties directed to provide submissions on jurisdiction over federally regulated respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex and record of offences against Bombardier Inc. and CN Rail.

The applicant's union, Teamster Canada Rail Conference, requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted.

CN Rail requested the application be dismissed against it, arguing it is a federally regulated enterprise outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the parties to provide written submissions on the jurisdictional issue.

Nicholson v. Bombardier, 2011 HRTO 938

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2011

Union granted intervenor status in member's human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability and age.

The applicant's bargaining agent, the United Steelworkers, Local 8694, requested to intervene in the proceeding.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene in accordance with its standard practice for unionized applicants, with the scope of participation to be determined by the hearing adjudicator.

Shaw v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2011 HRTO 930

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 12, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to jurisdictional notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, raising jurisdictional concerns regarding the timeliness of the application and the lack of specific acts of discrimination alleged.

The applicant was directed to provide written submissions but failed to respond by the deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Djangi v. Coinamatic Canada, 2011 HRTO 914

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 10, 2011

Request to dismiss human rights application regarding ODSP benefits denied; judicial immunity inapplicable to administrative decisions.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability (fibromyalgia) in the provision of ODSP benefits.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal dismiss the application on the grounds of judicial immunity, absence of a service under the Code, and lack of a prima facie case.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that judicial immunity does not apply to preliminary administrative decisions, the allegations regarding discriminatory policies fall within the social area of services, and the prima facie case should not be determined at this preliminary stage.

Goldman v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2011 HRTO 910

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 9, 2011

Human rights application dismissed under section 34(11) due to concurrent civil action for wrongful dismissal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on age and disability.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had already commenced a civil action for wrongful dismissal based on the same facts and seeking similar remedies.

The Tribunal found that the civil action and the application relied on the same facts and sought similar human rights remedies.

As section 34(11) is a mandatory bar intended to prevent duplicate proceedings, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Beatty v. Best Theratronics, 2011 HRTO 904

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2011

Human rights application deemed timely as the evolving housing requests constituted a series of incidents.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination after the respondents denied his request for a two-bedroom rent-geared-to-income apartment.

The respondents argued the application was filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's evolving requests and submissions of additional medical documentation constituted a series of incidents.

Because the final denial occurred within one year of the application filing date, the application was deemed timely.

Whyte v. Sudbury (City), 2011 HRTO 885

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2011

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed for failure to provide a copy of the alleged settlement.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement but failed to include a copy of the written settlement alleged to have been breached, as required by the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Despite a Notice of Intent to Dismiss directing the applicant to provide the settlement and explain the breach, the applicant failed to do so.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as outside its jurisdiction.

Stopyn v. UAPP Union Local 67, 2011 HRTO 884

Tribunal adds union as respondent and removes personal respondents in workplace discrimination application.

The applicant filed a human rights application against his former employer, the Ministry of Children & Youth Services, and 16 personal respondents, alleging discrimination and reprisal.

The applicant subsequently requested to add his union, OPSEU, as a respondent, alleging it failed to facilitate accommodation and address a poisoned work environment.

The Tribunal granted the request to add OPSEU, finding allegations that could support a Code violation.

The Tribunal also removed all 16 personal respondents, noting the corporate respondents could be held vicariously liable and had the ability to remedy any proven infringements.

Stewart v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services), 2011 HRTO 864

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2011

Early dismissal denied; WSIB decision on re-employment did not appropriately deal with human rights allegations.

The respondents requested early dismissal of the human rights application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment based on disability and age following a workplace accident.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for early dismissal, finding that the WSIB decision only addressed re-employment obligations under its own policies and did not consider the Code issues of disability and age discrimination.

Ralph Maze v. Genco Distribution of Canada Inc. and Lisa Hyndman, 2011 HRTO 866

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 3, 2011

Tribunal declined to dismiss or defer human rights application as no civil action was pending.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by a security guard.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed or deferred due to a pending civil action.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss or Defer.

The applicant confirmed there were no ongoing court proceedings regarding the same facts.

The Tribunal found no grounds to dismiss or defer the application under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code.

Seran So-Ham v. Natasha Savic, 2011 HRTO 862

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as out of time; delay not incurred in good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in a mentorship program.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident of discrimination in 2009.

The applicant argued the discrimination continued into 2011 when she made inquiries about the program.

The Tribunal rejected this argument, finding the last incident occurred in 2009 and the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay.

The application was dismissed as out of time.

Abdul v. Inside Out Toronto, 2011 HRTO 824

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 26, 2011

Reconsideration request denied as applicant failed to meet Rule 26.5 criteria and merely reargued facts.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code for being substantially the same as a prior complaint.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant merely sought to reargue facts and challenge the previous decision without satisfying any of the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Christianson v. Windsor Police Service, 2011 HRTO 815

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2011

Tribunal removes individual manager as respondent and substitutes corporate employer in human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination on the basis of disability and sex, naming only her manager as a respondent.

The respondent filed a request to remove the manager as a personal respondent and substitute the employer, the Municipality of Chatham-Kent.

Applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal granted the request, finding that the manager was acting in the course of his employment, the employer accepted vicarious liability, and there was no compelling reason to proceed against the manager personally.

Jennifer Lebert v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2011 HRTO 795

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2011

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as television broadcasting falls under exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that news coverage carried by the respondent television station was racist.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the respondent appeared to be a federally-regulated enterprise.

The applicant argued that the program was created in Ontario and contained acquired content, bringing it within provincial jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the regulation and content of television broadcasting fall within exclusive federal jurisdiction under section 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Hana Abdul v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and David McGuffin, 2011 HRTO 813

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2011

Tribunal declines to dismiss reprisal application at preliminary stage but orders applicant to specify Code grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period and did not allege a specific ground of discrimination.

The applicant responded, clarifying the date of the last incident and the nature of the reprisal allegations.

The Tribunal applied the 'plain and obvious' test and found it was not plain and obvious that the application fell outside its jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a detailed statement specifying the Code grounds related to her allegations, failing which the application may be dismissed as abandoned.

Borba v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2011 HRTO 781

Page 27 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 27 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Jones v. No Frills Malloch’s 3928, 2011 HRTO 955

Ena Chadha

Shirley Ziemendorf v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2011 HRTO 947

Ena Chadha

Fry v. Running Room Canada Inc., 2011 HRTO 928

Ena Chadha

Elizabeth Long v. Co-Operators Life Insurance Company, 2011 HRTO 940

Ena Chadha

Tharmasuthaharan Tharmaratnam v. The Miller Group, 2011 HRTO 939

Ena Chadha

Nicholson v. Bombardier, 2011 HRTO 938

Ena Chadha

Shaw v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2011 HRTO 930

Ena Chadha

Djangi v. Coinamatic Canada, 2011 HRTO 914

Ena Chadha

Goldman v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2011 HRTO 910

Ena Chadha

Beatty v. Best Theratronics, 2011 HRTO 904

Ena Chadha

Whyte v. Sudbury (City), 2011 HRTO 885

Ena Chadha

Stopyn v. UAPP Union Local 67, 2011 HRTO 884

George Parris

Eric O’Brien

Ena Chadha

Stewart v. Ontario (Children and Youth Services), 2011 HRTO 864

Ena Chadha

Ralph Maze v. Genco Distribution of Canada Inc. and Lisa Hyndman, 2011 HRTO 866

Ena Chadha

Seran So-Ham v. Natasha Savic, 2011 HRTO 862

Ena Chadha

Abdul v. Inside Out Toronto, 2011 HRTO 824

Ena Chadha

Christianson v. Windsor Police Service, 2011 HRTO 815

Ena Chadha

Jennifer Lebert v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2011 HRTO 795

Ena Chadha

Hana Abdul v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and David McGuffin, 2011 HRTO 813

Ena Chadha

Borba v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2011 HRTO 781

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

for the Applicants

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place