Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Jackie VanDerMeulen

5 cases2013–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 25, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent OLRB review of ESA pregnancy reprisal claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of ancestry, sex, and pregnancy.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred because the applicant had commenced a concurrent reprisal claim under the Employment Standards Act, which was currently under review by the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Tribunal found that the ESA claim and the human rights application raised similar issues and overlapping facts regarding pregnancy discrimination.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the OLRB matter.

Jurczynski v. Canadian Specialty Metals ULC, 2013 HRTO 1804

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2013

Request for reconsideration denied as applicant merely sought to reargue the dismissed human rights application.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application regarding shared housing.

The applicant argued that the Tribunal failed to consider his disability and the evidence supporting his claims.

The Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration, finding that the applicant was merely attempting to reargue his case and expressing disagreement with the original findings, which does not meet the criteria for reconsideration under Rule 26.5.

Nana Kow Kuffuor v. Michael Wan Kam, 2013 HRTO 1793

Frances Gallop

12 cases2010–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 24, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as nuclear facilities are federally regulated.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability against Ontario Power Generation and several individuals.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that the applicant's employment at a nuclear generating station falls under federal regulation.

The Tribunal agreed, noting previous decisions confirming that the nuclear power sector is federally regulated for human rights purposes.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Wallen v. Ontario Power Generation, 2013 HRTO 1795

Joseph Tascona

9 cases1990–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 22, 2013

Human rights application reactivated following the conclusion of related grievance procedures.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, which was previously deferred pending the completion of grievance procedures.

Following a settlement of the grievance, the applicant requested to reactivate the application.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application and noted it would consider the respondents' subsequent requests for summary hearing and dismissal.

Tammy May v. Mill Creek Care Centre and Maureen Pauls, 2013 HRTO 1778

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 22, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith for late filing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on race, place of origin, ethnic origin, sex, sexual solicitation or advances, and gender identity.

The last alleged incident occurred in August 2010, but the application was not filed until June 2013.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide submissions on the preliminary issues of untimeliness and abuse of process, as a virtually identical application had been previously dismissed for delay.

The applicant argued he was unaware his concerns involved human rights and blamed the Canadian Human Rights Commission for the delay.

The Tribunal rejected these explanations, finding the applicant had been aware of the human rights issues since 2011.

The Tribunal concluded the delay was not incurred in good faith and dismissed the application.

Eskaros v. Bee-Clean Building Maintenance, 2013 HRTO 1774

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 17, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination.

Despite multiple extensions and directions to file submissions addressing the jurisdictional issue, the applicant failed to respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Burgess v. The Athletic Club of London, 2013 HRTO 1755

Tribunal adds supervisor as respondent but dismisses untimely allegations prior to August 2011.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination and reprisal by his former employer and supervisor.

The corporate respondent requested a deferral pending a WSIB matter, which the Tribunal denied as there were no concurrent proceedings.

The applicant sought to add his former supervisor as an individual respondent and to amend the application to include earlier allegations.

The Tribunal granted the request to add the supervisor, finding his alleged conduct was central to the claims.

However, the Tribunal found that allegations prior to August 2011 were statute-barred, as they did not form part of a series of incidents and the applicant failed to establish a good faith explanation for the delay.

The request to amend the application was granted only for allegations from August 22, 2011 onwards.

Peltier v. 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management, 2013 HRTO 1756

Caroline V. Jones

6 cases2010–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 17, 2013

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application granted despite minor delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination and reprisal against her employer and an individual respondent.

The application was deferred pending grievance proceedings.

After settling with the employer, the applicant requested to reactivate the application against the individual respondent.

The respondent opposed the reactivation, arguing it was filed outside the 60-day time limit.

The Tribunal granted the reactivation request, finding a reasonable explanation for the delay and no prejudice to the respondent.

Griffith v. Knight, 2013 HRTO 1758

Heather Alden

14 cases1995–2016

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 11, 2013

Human rights application reactivated after union confirmed withdrawal of the applicant's related grievance.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the completion of a grievance process.

The respondents disputed that the grievance process was complete.

Following a Case Assessment Direction, the applicant's union confirmed that the grievance had been withdrawn.

The Tribunal found it appropriate to reactivate the application and directed the respondents to file their responses.

Mariusz Beres v. Toronto District School Board, 2013 HRTO 1714

Zachary Green

7 cases2011–2014

Andrea M. Dedrick

3 cases2013–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 11, 2013

Request for disclosure and production denied as documents related to allegations previously excluded from the Application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability regarding the respondent County's refusal to cover the costs of medical marihuana.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking disclosure and production of various documents relating to provincial health care services, wait times, and the Ontario Disability Support Program.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the requested documents related to broad allegations regarding health care delivery that the Tribunal had previously refused to add to the scope of the Application.

Barbara Kueber v. The Corporation of the County of Grey, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Attorney General of Ontario, the Minister of Community and Social Services and the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, 2013 HRTO 1728

Elizabeth Nurse

29 cases1994–2024

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 10, 2013

Union granted intervenor status in employee's human rights application alleging employment discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167, requested to intervene as the bargaining agent for the applicant's bargaining unit.

The applicant opposed the intervention, citing a separate application filed against the union.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting its standard practice of granting intervention status to a bargaining agent in employment discrimination cases absent exceptional circumstances.

Zoran Vasileski v. Corporation of the City of Hamilton, Community Services Department, Ontario Works, Heather Russell and Carole Zoghaib, 2013 HRTO 1708

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 9, 2013

Tribunal assumes jurisdiction over age discrimination claim but seeks submissions on deferring to concurrent federal complaint.

The applicant filed an application alleging age discrimination after the respondent informed him his services as an election observer in Ukraine were not required.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, questioning its jurisdiction over the respondent.

After receiving submissions, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the respondent's labour relations fell outside provincial jurisdiction, as it is a not-for-profit agency operating in Ontario.

The Tribunal decided to continue processing the application but directed the parties to provide submissions on whether the matter should be deferred pending the outcome of a concurrent complaint filed with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

Denis Frazer v. CANADEM, 2013 HRTO 1706

Jeff Andrew

14 cases1993–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 8, 2013

Union granted intervenor status; submissions requested on deferral pending grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability and age.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, noting it was representing the applicant in a related grievance proceeding to arbitration.

The applicant opposed the intervention.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status, noting its standard practice to do so absent exceptional circumstances.

The Tribunal also requested submissions from the parties on whether the application should be deferred pending the completion of the grievance arbitration.

DeFrancesco v. Loblaw Great Food, 2013 HRTO 1690

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 8, 2013

Respondent granted 14-day extension to file response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent was granted 14 days to file a response along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal would proceed without further notice.

Prashant Kumar v. Toronto Police Service, 2013 HRTO 1697

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 8, 2013

Respondents deemed to have waived participation rights after failing to file Responses to human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability and sex.

The respondents failed to file Responses despite receiving notice and a previous interim decision warning of the consequences.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondents are deemed to have waived all rights to further notice or participation in the proceeding, and scheduled a case management conference call to determine next steps for the applicant.

Lacey v. Dove Foods Limited, 2013 HRTO 1694

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 7, 2013

Request to defer human rights application pending WSIB appeal denied due to minimal issue overlap.

The respondent employer requested that the Tribunal defer the applicant's human rights application alleging disability discrimination and failure to accommodate, pending the resolution of the applicant's ongoing WSIB appeal.

The Tribunal denied the request to defer, finding that the WSIB appeal related to the termination of Loss of Earnings benefits due to the applicant's travel outside the country, and would not determine the Code-related issues regarding the employer's alleged failure to accommodate.

Robabeh Pourasadi v. Bentley Leathers Inc., 2013 HRTO 1685

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Respondent given 14 days to file a response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The respondent failed to file a response by the deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate and granting a 14-day extension to file a response with an explanation for the delay.

Coreena Roger v. Oceans Fresh Food Market, 2013 HRTO 1650

Caroline V. Jones

6 cases2010–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith reason for missing limitation period.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination and reprisal by her former vice-principal and principal.

The application was filed approximately 15 months after the last alleged incident of discrimination, beyond the one-year limitation period under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the delay was in good faith because she was awaiting the outcome of an internal investigation and was travelling abroad.

The Tribunal found that waiting for an internal process to conclude and travelling did not constitute a good faith reason for delay, particularly as the applicant had actively pursued other complaints during that time.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Kelli Leizer v. Patrick Knight, 2013 HRTO 1652

Kyle D. Cleaver

1 case2013–2013

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to concurrent civil proceeding seeking Code remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on race, colour, place of origin, ethnic origin, and disability, claiming he was unfairly criticized and terminated after a workplace injury.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had commenced a civil proceeding in Small Claims Court seeking Code remedies based on the same facts.

The Tribunal found that the civil action explicitly raised Code-related interests and sought remedial redress for the alleged human rights concerns.

As the Tribunal has no discretion when an application falls within section 34(11), the application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Tewari v. V.G. Packers Limited o/a VG Meats, 2013 HRTO 1642

Emma Phillips

11 cases2007–2025

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Union granted intervenor status; employer's request to defer human rights application pending internal investigation denied.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The Faculty Association requested to intervene as the applicant's bargaining agent, which the Tribunal granted.

The respondent requested to defer the application pending an internal workplace investigation.

The Tribunal denied the deferral request, holding that an internal investigation is not a legal proceeding that could lead to inconsistent findings of fact or law.

Saldanha v. OCAD University, 2013 HRTO 1651

Page 2 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 2 of 44 (867 cases)

Jackie VanDerMeulen

Ena Chadha

Jurczynski v. Canadian Specialty Metals ULC, 2013 HRTO 1804

Ena Chadha

Nana Kow Kuffuor v. Michael Wan Kam, 2013 HRTO 1793

Frances Gallop

Ena Chadha

Wallen v. Ontario Power Generation, 2013 HRTO 1795

Joseph Tascona

Ena Chadha

Tammy May v. Mill Creek Care Centre and Maureen Pauls, 2013 HRTO 1778

Ena Chadha

Eskaros v. Bee-Clean Building Maintenance, 2013 HRTO 1774

Ena Chadha

Burgess v. The Athletic Club of London, 2013 HRTO 1755

Kathleen E. Andrew

Christa L. Rea

Ena Chadha

Peltier v. 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management, 2013 HRTO 1756

Caroline V. Jones

Ena Chadha

Griffith v. Knight, 2013 HRTO 1758

Heather Alden

Ena Chadha

Mariusz Beres v. Toronto District School Board, 2013 HRTO 1714

Zachary Green

Andrea M. Dedrick

Ena Chadha

Barbara Kueber v. The Corporation of the County of Grey, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Attorney General of Ontario, the Minister of Community and Social Services and the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, 2013 HRTO 1728

Elizabeth Nurse

Ena Chadha

Zoran Vasileski v. Corporation of the City of Hamilton, Community Services Department, Ontario Works, Heather Russell and Carole Zoghaib, 2013 HRTO 1708

Ena Chadha

Denis Frazer v. CANADEM, 2013 HRTO 1706

Jeff Andrew

Ena Chadha

DeFrancesco v. Loblaw Great Food, 2013 HRTO 1690

Ena Chadha

Prashant Kumar v. Toronto Police Service, 2013 HRTO 1697

Ena Chadha

Lacey v. Dove Foods Limited, 2013 HRTO 1694

Ena Chadha

Robabeh Pourasadi v. Bentley Leathers Inc., 2013 HRTO 1685

Ena Chadha

Coreena Roger v. Oceans Fresh Food Market, 2013 HRTO 1650

Caroline V. Jones

Ena Chadha

Kelli Leizer v. Patrick Knight, 2013 HRTO 1652

Kyle D. Cleaver

Ena Chadha

Tewari v. V.G. Packers Limited o/a VG Meats, 2013 HRTO 1642

Emma Phillips

Ena Chadha

Saldanha v. OCAD University, 2013 HRTO 1651

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU