HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO
B E T W E E N:
Zoran Vasileski
Applicant
-and-
Corporation of the City of Hamilton, Community Services Department, Ontario Works, Heather Russell and Carole Zoghaib
Respondents
-and-
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167
Intervenor
INTERIM DECISION
Adjudicator: Ena Chadha
Date: October 10, 2013
Citation: 2013 HRTO 1708
Indexed as: Vasileski v. Corporation of the City of Hamilton,
Community Services Department, Ontario Works
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS
Zoran Vasileski, Applicant ) Self-represented
Canadian Union of Public Employees, ) Elizabeth Nurse, Counsel
Local 5167, Affected Party )
1The applicant filed this Application on April 30, 2012, under section 34 of the Ontario Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the "Code"), alleging discrimination with respect to employment.
2The applicant's materials reference concerns regarding his interactions with the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 5167 ("the Union").
3On August 15, 2013, the Union filed a Request to Intervene in this Application. The Union states that it is the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit of employees with the respondent employer and that it has knowledge of the circumstances alleged in the Application narrative.
4The applicant filed submissions opposing the request to intervene. The applicant submits that the Union has not represented his interests and, consequently, he has filed a separate application as against the Union. The applicant submits that the Union should not be granted full party status.
5In accordance with the Tribunal's standard practice where an applicant is a member of a bargaining unit represented by a union or association, the Union's request to intervene is granted. As the Tribunal indicated in Boyce v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2009 HRTO 131:
A union or association nearly always has an interest in a human rights application brought by an employee in a bargaining unit it represents when the application alleges discrimination in employment. Absent exceptional circumstances, the applicant's bargaining agent will be granted intervention status in Tribunal proceedings where it requests it.
6The scope of the Union participation in any mediation and/or hearing will be determined by the mediator and/or adjudicator overseeing this matter.
7I am not seized.
Dated at Toronto, this 10^th^ day of October, 2013.
"Signed by"
Ena Chadha
Vice-chair

