Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 1, 2012

Application for contravention of settlement dismissed as alleged breached terms were not in writing.

The applicant filed an Application for Contravention of Settlement alleging the respondent breached a settlement agreement by failing to provide her with a permanent full-time position.

The respondent argued there was no such term in the written settlement.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding it lacked jurisdiction under section 45.9 of the Human Rights Code because the alleged breached terms were verbal assurances and not contained in the signed written settlement.

Tammy Brown v. Primary Response Inc., 2012 HRTO 424

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to establish good faith reasons.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability and sex, approximately 19 months after the last alleged incident of discrimination.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the delay was incurred in good faith under section 34(2) of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant argued the delay was due to financial difficulties, mental health issues, and the ill health of her legal team.

The Tribunal found that financial difficulties and lack of legal representation do not constitute good faith reasons for delay.

The applicant also failed to provide medical evidence for the relevant period to substantiate her claim of mental incapacity, and evidence showed she was actively pursuing other legal processes during that time.

The Tribunal concluded the delay was not incurred in good faith and dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Tamara Moro v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2012 HRTO 436

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 29, 2012

Tribunal grants union intervenor status and denies applicant's preliminary requests for document production and representative removal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary requests.

The Tribunal denied the applicant's requests for an in-person hearing, production of documents, and the removal of the union's representative.

The Tribunal granted the union's request for intervenor status, finding that it had a significant interest in the proceeding and could assist the Tribunal with matters related to the collective agreement.

J.C. by his next friend R.C. v. Smylie’s Independent Grocers, 2012 HRTO 427

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2012

Request to amend human rights application granted where amendments clarified allegations and respondents took no position.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging employment discrimination on the basis of disability.

The applicant subsequently brought a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend the application to provide more details of the alleged harassment and discrimination, and to specify the remedies sought.

The respondents took no position on the request.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, noting that the application was in its early stages, the amendments clarified the original allegations without altering the nature of the application, and there was no prejudice to the respondents.

Kelly Smyth v. Native Women’s Centre, OI Employee Leasing Inc. and Jennifer Talbot, 2012 HRTO 406

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 27, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant's human rights application was previously deferred.

The respondent and the applicant's counsel informed the Tribunal that the matter had been settled, but the applicant's counsel was unable to contact the applicant to sign the necessary forms.

The Tribunal directed the parties to confirm the settlement and warned that failure to respond could result in dismissal for abandonment.

The applicant failed to respond and could not be contacted.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it pursuant to Rules 1.13 and 5.4 of the HRTO Rules of Procedure.

Bohdan Czornodolskyj v. Bombardier Inc., 2012 HRTO 411

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2012

Request to dismiss application denied; internal workplace investigation is not a 'proceeding' under section 45.1.

The respondent requested that the human rights application alleging workplace discrimination and harassment be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent argued that an internal fact-finding investigation conducted by the employer appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that an internal investigation does not constitute a 'proceeding' within the meaning of section 45.1.

Dinorah Martinez-Cedeno v. Elizabeth Ann Martens, 2012 HRTO 383

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2012

Application reactivated following withdrawal of criminal charges; request for extension of time denied as premature.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the disposition of criminal charges.

The criminal charges were withdrawn, and the respondents did not oppose the reactivation.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application.

The applicant's request for an extension of time to prepare evidence was denied as premature, since no hearing had been scheduled and the disclosure timelines had not yet been triggered.

John Roffelsen v. Affinity Jewellers Limited and Brent Denure, 2012 HRTO 392

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 23, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide representatives' LSUC license numbers.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and harassment in employment on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal previously ordered the applicant to provide Law Society of Upper Canada license numbers for her representatives.

After the applicant failed to comply with the Interim Decision and a subsequent Case Assessment Direction, the Tribunal determined the application was abandoned and dismissed it.

Sandra Samuel v. Waterloo Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 380

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2012

Reconsideration denied; applicant failed to prove civil action was discontinued or lack of notice.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application under section 34(11) of the Code due to an ongoing civil proceeding.

The applicant argued she was no longer pursuing the civil action and had not received notice on how to respond to the respondent's request to dismiss.

The Tribunal denied the reconsideration request, finding the applicant failed to provide evidence that the civil action was discontinued and confirming she had received proper notice of the request to dismiss.

The applicant failed to establish any criteria under Rule 26.5 to warrant reconsideration.

Jarrett v. Timothy Vance, 2012 HRTO 373

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 14, 2012

Tribunal adds alleged harasser as personal respondent and orders corporate respondent to provide his address.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment by a chef and reprisal by the restaurant owner.

The applicant brought a Request for an Order During Proceedings to add the chef as a personal respondent and to compel the corporate respondent to provide his last known address.

The Tribunal applied the Smyth test and found it appropriate to add the chef as a respondent, noting the corporate respondent disputed liability.

The Tribunal also ordered the corporate respondent to provide the chef's last known address to facilitate delivery of the Application.

Chung v. Angela Wai Ching Luk Fung, 2012 HRTO 305

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 14, 2012

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the employer is a federally regulated trucking business.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents filed a request to dismiss the application on the basis that the corporate respondent is an interprovincial and international trucking business governed by the Canada Labour Code.

The Tribunal found that the employer is a federally regulated business and therefore falls outside provincial jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Henry v. Ceva Logistics Inc., 2012 HRTO 321

Jack Braithwaite

15 cases1988–2015

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 13, 2012

Tribunal strikes portions of human rights application as abuse of process due to prior grievance settlements.

The applicant, a university professor, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal based on race, ancestry, and sex.

The respondents argued that several of the allegations had been previously resolved through grievance settlements and that allowing them to proceed would constitute an abuse of process.

The Tribunal found that the allegations regarding the denial of promotion, unfair teaching load, handling of student complaints, and deduction of overload pay were the subject of binding settlements or resolutions.

Consequently, the Tribunal struck those allegations from the application as an abuse of process, allowing only the unresolved allegations concerning the university President's conduct and the Board of Regents eligibility criteria to proceed.

Mary Ann Corbiere v. University of Sudbury, Andrii Krawchuk, and Nahum Kanhai, 2012 HRTO 309

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 9, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB appeal involving overlapping factual issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, claiming the respondents failed to accommodate his workplace injuries and unfairly terminated his employment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed or deferred because the applicant's WSIB claim regarding the same injuries was denied and an appeal was pending.

The Tribunal found significant factual overlap between the application and the concurrent WSIB proceeding, particularly regarding the alleged injury, medical restrictions, and cessation of employment.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the WSIB proceedings to avoid inconsistent decisions.

Pillon v. Turtle Island Recycling Corp., 2012 HRTO 286

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 8, 2012

Human rights application reactivated following the resolution of the applicant's related grievance.

The applicant requested the reactivation of his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the conclusion of his grievance process.

The applicant and the intervenor union filed materials indicating the grievance was resolved.

As the respondents did not oppose the request and there was no outstanding grievance process, the Tribunal reactivated the application and directed the respondent hospital to indicate its willingness to participate in mediation.

Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre, 2012 HRTO 271

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 8, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending the resolution of a concurrent employment grievance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination, harassment, and reprisal in employment.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the applicant had also filed a grievance alleging termination without just cause, which involved the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal found that there was an ongoing grievance and a related jurisdictional proceeding before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance.

Tomlinson v. J. Provost Contracting Ltd., 2012 HRTO 275

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 8, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related union grievances regarding sick benefits and accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically regarding sick benefits and accommodation.

The respondent requested that the application be deferred pending the completion of two related union grievances.

The applicant's union also requested intervenor status.

The Tribunal granted the union intervenor status and deferred the application, finding that the grievances and the application arose from the same factual background and sought similar remedies.

Denis Daoust v. Health Sciences North, 2012 HRTO 278

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 6, 2012

Request to amend human rights application to add claims for severance and general damages granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, including failure to accommodate and termination while absent.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to amend her application to include claims for severance and general damages.

The respondent did not file submissions in response.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, noting that the hearing had not yet been scheduled, no documents had been exchanged, and there was no evidence of prejudice to the respondent.

Gut v. Roadtrek MotorHomes Inc., 2012 HRTO 253

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 3, 2012

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent is a federally regulated telecommunications company.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination against Rogers Communications.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated enterprise.

After receiving written submissions from the applicant acknowledging the respondent's federal regulation, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, noting that inter-provincial telecommunications companies fall under federal jurisdiction.

Syed v. Rogers Communications, 2012 HRTO 248

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 3, 2012

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent is a federally regulated telecommunications company.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination against Rogers Communications.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss on the basis that the respondent appeared to be a federally regulated business.

The applicant acknowledged this in his submissions.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the respondent is an inter-provincial federally-regulated telecommunications company subject to the jurisdiction of the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

Salman Syed v. Rogers Communications, 2012 HRTO 247

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 2, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related criminal proceeding against the applicant.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment, solicitation, and reprisal by the respondent employer.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer due to concurrent grievance and criminal proceedings involving the same facts.

The respondent supported deferral, noting the applicant was criminally charged in relation to the reprisal allegations.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the criminal proceeding to avoid inconsistent findings of fact or law.

Lambert Philadelphia v. Serco Des Inc., 2012 HRTO 241

Page 18 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 18 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Tammy Brown v. Primary Response Inc., 2012 HRTO 424

Ron LeClair

Peter Thorup

David Sanders

Ena Chadha

Tamara Moro v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2012 HRTO 436

Ena Chadha

J.C. by his next friend R.C. v. Smylie’s Independent Grocers, 2012 HRTO 427

Ena Chadha

Kelly Smyth v. Native Women’s Centre, OI Employee Leasing Inc. and Jennifer Talbot, 2012 HRTO 406

Ena Chadha

Bohdan Czornodolskyj v. Bombardier Inc., 2012 HRTO 411

Ena Chadha

Dinorah Martinez-Cedeno v. Elizabeth Ann Martens, 2012 HRTO 383

Ena Chadha

John Roffelsen v. Affinity Jewellers Limited and Brent Denure, 2012 HRTO 392

Ena Chadha

Sandra Samuel v. Waterloo Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 380

Ena Chadha

Jarrett v. Timothy Vance, 2012 HRTO 373

Ena Chadha

Chung v. Angela Wai Ching Luk Fung, 2012 HRTO 305

Ena Chadha

Henry v. Ceva Logistics Inc., 2012 HRTO 321

Jack Braithwaite

Ena Chadha

Mary Ann Corbiere v. University of Sudbury, Andrii Krawchuk, and Nahum Kanhai, 2012 HRTO 309

Ena Chadha

Pillon v. Turtle Island Recycling Corp., 2012 HRTO 286

Ena Chadha

Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre, 2012 HRTO 271

Ena Chadha

Tomlinson v. J. Provost Contracting Ltd., 2012 HRTO 275

Ena Chadha

Denis Daoust v. Health Sciences North, 2012 HRTO 278

Ena Chadha

Gut v. Roadtrek MotorHomes Inc., 2012 HRTO 253

Ena Chadha

Syed v. Rogers Communications, 2012 HRTO 248

Ena Chadha

Salman Syed v. Rogers Communications, 2012 HRTO 247

Ena Chadha

Lambert Philadelphia v. Serco Des Inc., 2012 HRTO 241

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

for the Applicant Karina Vilner