Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario
B E T W E E N:
Timothy Thurtle
Applicant
-and-
William Osler Health Centre and Carillion Services Inc.
Respondents
-and-
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 145
Intervenor
INTERIM DECISION
Adjudicator: Ena Chadha
Date: February 8, 2012
Citation: 2012 HRTO 271
Indexed as: Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre
1This Application was deferred by way of Interim Decision 2010 HRTO 1908 pending the conclusion of the applicant’s grievance process. In that same Interim Decision, the applicant’s union, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 145 (“Union”), was granted intervenor status.
2The applicant requests that the Tribunal reactivate his Application. The applicant and the Union have filed materials which indicate that the applicant’s grievance was resolved.
3Neither respondent has filed a response to the applicant’s request to reactivate.
4Based on the applicant’s and the Union’s materials, it appears that there is no outstanding grievance process. As such, there is no basis to continue deferring this Application. The Tribunal will reactivate the Application.
5In their pleadings, the applicant and respondent Carrilion both indicated that they were amenable to participating in mediation. The respondent Hospital did not indicate whether or not it was willing to attend mediation.
6Accordingly, the Tribunal reactivates the Application. The Tribunal further orders that within 7 days of the date of this Interim Decision, the respondent Hospital write to the Tribunal, copied to the other parties and intervenor, indicating whether it is amenable to participating in mediation.
7I am not seized.
Dated at Toronto, this 8^th^ day of February, 2012.
”signed by”
Ena Chadha
Vice-chair