Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Kathryn Bird

In Private Practice43 cases2009–2026

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2012

Respondent's request for particulars prior to filing a response denied as application contained adequate details.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination and harassment over five years.

The respondent filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking further particulars before filing its Response, arguing the allegations lacked sufficient specificity regarding dates, details, and identities.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the Application provided adequate details, including the department, time period, and names of supervisory and human resources personnel who were allegedly informed of the concerns.

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file its Response, noting it could indicate within the Response which specific allegations it could not address.

Miga v. Arcelor-Mital Dofasco, 2012 HRTO 619

Mitchell B. Rosenblatt

11 cases2004–2022

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2012

Human rights application dismissed under s. 45.1 as the Landlord and Tenant Board already decided the accommodation issue.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in housing based on disability, claiming the respondents refused to transfer him to a larger apartment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the matter was already dealt with by the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB).

The Tribunal found that the LTB had expressly considered the human rights issues, found a failure to accommodate, and issued a remedial order.

Applying the Supreme Court's principles on finality of litigation, the Tribunal concluded the LTB appropriately dealt with the substance of the application and dismissed it.

Barton v. Arnold & Simson Co., 2012 HRTO 621

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB appeals regarding workplace accommodation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability against his employer and the WSIB, relating to the suitability of an accommodated position and loss of earnings benefits.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed or deferred pending the outcome of ongoing WSIB appeals.

The Tribunal denied the employer's premature request for production of the WSIB file.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the human rights application, finding significant factual and legal overlap between the application and the concurrent WSIB proceedings.

Hussey v. Crossby Dewar Inc., 2012 HRTO 618

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2012

Human rights applications consolidated and deferred pending related Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings.

The applicant filed two human rights applications against her landlord and his real estate agent, alleging discrimination in housing based on creed, marital status, and perceived mental disability.

The respondents requested deferral because related matters were pending before the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB).

The Tribunal ordered the two applications consolidated to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings.

The Tribunal also deferred the consolidated applications pending the completion of the LTB proceedings, noting the significant overlap in the factual allegations and the risk of inconsistent findings.

Vasdani v. Pal, 2012 HRTO 565

John Moszynski

71 cases1986–2017

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 20, 2012

Tribunal removes personal respondents from age discrimination application as they acted in course of employment.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination against the organizational respondent union and two personal respondents.

The respondents filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to remove the personal respondents, arguing they were acting in the course of their employment.

Applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal found that the organizational respondent could be held vicariously liable and had the ability to remedy any infringement.

The Tribunal granted the request and removed the personal respondents from the proceeding.

Dubravko Cvetkovic v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 675, 2012 HRTO 573

Craig R. Colraine

3 cases2010–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 20, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent civil action involving overlapping facts and parties.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of family and marital status, stemming from a conflict between her husband and the personal respondent, who are co-owners of the corporate respondent.

The personal respondent requested deferral of the application because the applicant had also filed a civil action against him regarding shareholder rights and alleged misconduct.

The Tribunal granted the deferral, finding that the concurrent civil proceeding involved overlapping facts and parties, and could result in inconsistent findings of fact if both proceeded simultaneously.

Hanna v. A and 2M Drugs Limited, 2012 HRTO 576

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 20, 2012

Respondent granted 14-day extension to file Response to human rights application after missing initial deadline.

The applicant filed an Application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, along with an explanation for the delay, warning that failure to do so could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Natasha De Sousa v. Costco Wholesales, 2012 HRTO 579

John Westdal

10 cases2005–2017

Daryn M. Jefferies

2 cases2011–2012

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 16, 2012

Human rights application reactivated where union grievance process was stalled and unlikely to progress.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the outcome of two grievances.

The applicant argued that his previous union was replaced and his grievances were no longer being processed.

The respondents opposed reactivation, arguing the grievances remained outstanding.

The Tribunal found that the grievances were not actively being advanced and there was real doubt they would progress.

The Tribunal ordered the application to be reactivated.

Muir v. Humber River Regional Hospital, 2012 HRTO 548

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to maintain contact or provide disclosure.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

After the applicant's counsel withdrew, the Tribunal and the respondent were unable to reach the applicant at her provided contact information.

The applicant failed to meet disclosure deadlines and did not respond to the Tribunal's communications warning of potential abandonment.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Renée Hinds v. Vanier Centre for Women, 2012 HRTO 532

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2012

Application dismissed against individual respondent due to applicant's failure to provide valid contact information.

The applicant filed a human rights application naming both a corporate and an individual respondent.

The corporate respondent advised that the individual respondent was no longer employed there and had not received the application.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a current address for the individual respondent, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to respond.

The Tribunal dismissed the application against the individual respondent pursuant to Rules 5.3 and 6.6(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Fabiola Lema v. Appliance Canada, a Division of Leon’s Furniture Limited, 2012 HRTO 515

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2012

Respondents granted a final 10-day extension to file a Response to a human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents of the potential consequences of failing to participate, including the possibility of the Tribunal proceeding without them under Rule 5.5.

The respondents were granted a final 10 days to file a Response and provide an explanation for the delay.

Peter Stopyn v. United Association of Plumbing & Pipefitting Union Local 67, 2012 HRTO 521

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2012

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as concurrent WSIB proceedings had not concluded.

The applicant requested to reactivate a human rights application that had been deferred pending the outcome of a WSIB matter.

The applicant argued that reactivating the application would move the matter along and allow for mediation.

The Tribunal denied the request, noting that the WSIB matter was still under appeal to the WSIAT and had not yet concluded.

The Tribunal held that allowing the application to proceed would result in concurrent legal proceedings, thwarting the purpose of the deferral.

Chandiwala v. Weston Bakeries Ltd., 2012 HRTO 514

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 13, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB appeal involving overlapping accommodation issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and age, following a work-related injury, modified work, and subsequent layoff.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application because the applicant was actively pursuing a WSIB appeal regarding the closure of his work transition plan.

Despite the applicant's objections, the Tribunal found significant factual and legal overlap between the WSIB appeal and the human rights application, particularly concerning the suitability of alternate work and the alleged failure to accommodate.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the WSIB proceedings to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Chiuchiarelli v. Dow Motors (Ottawa) Ltd., 2012 HRTO 518

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2012

Union granted intervenor status in member's human rights application alleging disability discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant's union, the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 793, filed a Request to Intervene.

Noting its standard practice to grant intervention status to a bargaining agent absent exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene.

Marta Arce Vargas v. University of Waterloo, 2012 HRTO 510

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2012

Application dismissed against individual respondent due to applicant's failure to provide accurate contact information.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate and an individual respondent.

The corporate respondent advised that the individual respondent was no longer employed there.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a current address for the individual respondent, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal.

The applicant failed to provide the address or communicate regarding the issue.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as against the individual respondent pursuant to Rules 5.3 and 6.6(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Levac v. Startek Services Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 508

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2012

Human rights application dismissed because interprovincial trucking falls under exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment as a truck driver.

The respondent argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the employer was a federally regulated interprovincial transportation business.

The Tribunal found that the transportation business extended beyond the limits of the province, placing it under exclusive federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Joanne Jarrett v. William Orr, 2012 HRTO 484

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2012

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as grievance arbitration process had not concluded.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the completion of a grievance arbitration.

The applicant argued that the arbitration had been adjourned sine die while the union and respondent negotiated, and he could not wait indefinitely.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the grievance arbitration process had not yet concluded.

Reactivating the application would result in concurrent legal proceedings, thwarting the purpose of the deferral.

Chintaman v. Toronto District School Board, 2012 HRTO 474

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 7, 2012

Reconsideration request dismissed because the applicant failed to provide detailed reasons and representations.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed outside the one-year limitation period.

The applicant claimed the adjudicator made an error in law but failed to provide detailed reasons or representations specifying the nature of the error.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration because the applicant failed to meet the criteria set out in the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Jing Huo v. University of Western Ontario, 2012 HRTO 482

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2012

Tribunal adds corporate employer as respondent but refuses to remove individual respondent facing personal harassment allegations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and reprisal against the individual respondent, who was the owner of the tanning salon where she worked.

The individual respondent filed a request to add the corporate employer as a respondent and to remove himself from the application.

The Tribunal applied the Smyth factors and added the corporate employer as a respondent, noting the parties' agreement and potential liability.

However, applying the Persaud factors, the Tribunal declined to remove the individual respondent, as the applicant made extensive allegations of personal harassment against him.

Powell v. Sans Sole Tanning Salon Inc., 2012 HRTO 459

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent workplace grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had also filed a workplace grievance based on the same facts and issues.

The respondent supported deferral, noting an upcoming arbitration hearing, while the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance arbitration process to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Shahidi v. Mohawk College, 2012 HRTO 461

Page 17 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 17 of 44 (867 cases)

Kathryn Bird

Ena Chadha

Miga v. Arcelor-Mital Dofasco, 2012 HRTO 619

Mitchell B. Rosenblatt

Ena Chadha

Barton v. Arnold & Simson Co., 2012 HRTO 621

Michael Farago

Gurjit Brar

Carissa Tanzola

Ena Chadha

Hussey v. Crossby Dewar Inc., 2012 HRTO 618

Ena Chadha

Vasdani v. Pal, 2012 HRTO 565

John Moszynski

Ena Chadha

Dubravko Cvetkovic v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 675, 2012 HRTO 573

Craig R. Colraine

Ena Chadha

Hanna v. A and 2M Drugs Limited, 2012 HRTO 576

Ena Chadha

Natasha De Sousa v. Costco Wholesales, 2012 HRTO 579

John Westdal

Daryn M. Jefferies

Ena Chadha

Muir v. Humber River Regional Hospital, 2012 HRTO 548

Ena Chadha

Renée Hinds v. Vanier Centre for Women, 2012 HRTO 532

Ena Chadha

Fabiola Lema v. Appliance Canada, a Division of Leon’s Furniture Limited, 2012 HRTO 515

Ena Chadha

Peter Stopyn v. United Association of Plumbing & Pipefitting Union Local 67, 2012 HRTO 521

Ena Chadha

Chandiwala v. Weston Bakeries Ltd., 2012 HRTO 514

Ena Chadha

Chiuchiarelli v. Dow Motors (Ottawa) Ltd., 2012 HRTO 518

Ena Chadha

Marta Arce Vargas v. University of Waterloo, 2012 HRTO 510

Ena Chadha

Levac v. Startek Services Canada Ltd., 2012 HRTO 508

Ena Chadha

Joanne Jarrett v. William Orr, 2012 HRTO 484

Ena Chadha

Chintaman v. Toronto District School Board, 2012 HRTO 474

Ena Chadha

Jing Huo v. University of Western Ontario, 2012 HRTO 482

Ena Chadha

Powell v. Sans Sole Tanning Salon Inc., 2012 HRTO 459

Ena Chadha

Shahidi v. Mohawk College, 2012 HRTO 461

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party